Holden Culotta engagement report
@Holden_Culotta - 158K followers on X
Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.7K interactions against 158K followers, an engagement rate of 1.07%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 91K times each, and 1.83% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 57.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.
Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Holden Culotta's engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 59% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 1.07%, Holden Culotta sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 985 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 16, 202613x their median
Thomas Massie just went scorched Earth on the House floor. He’s demanding mass prosecutions. “The co-conspirators of Jeffrey Epstein.” “The rapists.” “The pedophiles.” “The ones who financed it.” “The ones who covered it up.” And his second Epstein files bill would give state attorneys general the power to finally “prosecute these crimes.” No matter what Trump’s DOJ says. “I’ve talked to the attorney general of New Mexico.” “There are crimes that occurred at Zorro Ranch for which there is no statute of limitations.” “We can still bring these pedophiles to justice.” @RepThomasMassie
- Aug 16, 202612x their median
Catherine Austin-Fitts just exposed what’s really going on with AI data centers. It’s not only about mass surveillance. They’re laying the foundation for a “full-blown social credit system.” Big Tech, central bankers, and the government are all in on it. This blew Tucker Carlson’s mind. “They want to put on your currency, your bank deposits, and your stocks and bonds what I call an automatic third lock.” “If I want to buy a Tucker Carlson hat … I give you cash, I get the hat, that’s a two-lock transaction.” “Let’s say we have money in the bank, and I want to buy the hat.” “The bank … has the ability to intercede and stop the transaction.” “That’s … what I call a manual third lock.” “The bank gets a third lock implementing the government regulations.” “If you look at what happened to the truckers in Canada … most of the banks exercised that manual third lock under the direction of the government.” But the government and central banks want something even more powerful. “An automatic third lock.” “I can turn off your money.” “I can raise your taxes without anybody having any say about it.” “Let me give you an example.” “The pandemic.” “If I say: you’re locked down, and you and your family can’t leave your house.” “Your money won’t work outside your house if I have an all-digital system with an automatic third lock.” “That’s what the data centers are for.” “Spatial control involves tremendous data, because of the videos and the cameras.” “But then you can imagine financial transactions all over the world.” “What is AI great at?” “Processing enormous amounts of mathematical information.” “If they can put a manual third lock in a social credit system for every individual, and essentially automate the whole process with AI, then they have the ability to control many, many people.” @TuckerCarlson @solari_the
- Sep 20, 20269.5x their median
Thomas Massie: “My election showed you who’s in charge.” “The people with the money.” “The lobbyists.” “I just said: I’m not voting for any wars.” “And I’m not sending American tax dollars to any country.” “For that, I had $30 million of foreign lobby money spent against me.” “The President campaigned against me.” “The Secretary of War came to my district and campaigned against me.” “But I had committed a few infractions before then.” “If you remember in 2020 … everybody was losing their ever-loving minds.” “We got this message from the leadership to stay home, it was too dangerous, and they would pass the biggest spending bill in history.” “$2 trillion.” “I said: this is nuts.” “So I got in my car and I drove to Washington, DC.” “450 miles.” “I started at midnight.” “I was able to make it before they could open the floor of the House the next day.” “I made the motion that you’ve got to show up.” “CNN called me the most hated person in Washington, DC.” @RepThomasMassie @RonPaulInstitut
- Sep 5, 20267.1x their median
Thomas Massie is refusing to back down. His second Epstein Files bill has “real teeth.” It would empower the states to bypass Trump’s DOJ and launch their own prosecutions. And over 100 lawmakers already signed a discharge petition to force a vote on it. Here’s everything the new bill would do: “One, it allows the Attorney General in … New Mexico to use Epstein files in a prosecution in state courts for state crimes.” “Zorro Ranch is as massive and expansive and is involved in the whole Epstein saga as much or more so than Epstein Island.” “They have gone in there, the New Mexico investigators.” “But something unprecedented is happening.” “The federal Attorney General is not cooperating with the state Attorney General.” “He has been stonewalled by Todd Blanche.” “So this bill gives him unfettered access to the files so that he could prosecute crimes that happened at Zorro Ranch.” Dave Smith: “Wow, so this has got real teeth on it this time.” Massie: “If you want a prosecution and you’ve given up on Trump’s administration, we’ve got a prosecutor who is ready to go after it.” Second, the new bill states “unambiguously” the DOJ cannot continue to refuse to release files about internal deliberations on “whether to prosecute or investigate” Epstein’s co-conspirators. Third, the bill would officially give legal standing to “three categories of litigants” to file their own lawsuits. “It gives standing to survivors.” “Because here’s another category of those 3 million files that are still being withheld.” “302 forms that the FBI must complete after they’ve interviewed a witness or a victim.” “Those files are missing.” It would also give standing to state Attorneys General to file lawsuits “if Todd Blanche or the next Attorney General doesn’t cooperate.” “And it would give members of Congress standing” to file lawsuits. @RepThomasMassie @ComicDaveSmith
- Aug 9, 20266.7x their median
Tim Dillon: “The FBI already probably watches this show.” “Now they’re really gonna watch it … ” “I can imagine a world where we have homegrown terrorists that start to attack data centers … as people resist their own extermination.” “Let me be very clear to the federal government.” “I am not for people trying to fight their own extermination.” “They should walk into extinction quietly.” “I’m saying this for the federal government right now … for JD and Thiel.” “I would never want to see a beautiful data center maimed by any of these sick people.” “I believe people need to accept their fate … that they are simply not needed.” “Their right to exist, their right to autonomy, their right to freedom, their right to water or whatever, what even is that?” “Is that in the Constitution?” “I think not.” “In the Bill of Rights, you have the right to water?” “I think not.” “Like all the tech people, I believe that the best way forward is to exterminate the human race.” @TimJDillon
- Sep 14, 20266.4x their median
Thomas Massie: “An entire class of billionaires goes to an island and does whatever they want.” “And when they get in trouble, they just bribe a judge or a politician.” “It’s all one big club.” “Gun control or abortion … that’s what they want you to fight over.” “You’re ignoring the war that’s unconstitutional.” “You’re ignoring the debt that’s now $40 trillion.” @RepThomasMassie @brownstoneinst
- Aug 15, 20266.1x their median
Tim Dillon: “They’re building a web of surveillance unlike anything that has ever existed.” “And if you don’t think this will be used on you … you’re crazy.” “Flock cameras.” “Facial recognition.” “Biometric eye scans.” “Everything you type into Google.” “All your text messages.” “Every email.” “Every phone call.” “Your physical location with your phone camera.” “This is all being done, and by the way, at a breakneck pace.” “All of this stuff, the Flock cameras … it’s not coming to just make you safe.” “They don’t care if you’re safe.” “All of it is coming to build a surveillance grid that is like nothing else that has ever existed.” “You will not be able to find a comparable in history for the level of surveillance that they’re going to employ.” @TimJDillon
- Aug 3, 20265.7x their median
Aaron Rodgers just declared victory against Fauci and his “trillion-dollar propaganda campaign.” “I told you I’d be on the right side of history.” “And look at us now.” “Tony Fauci is an absolute criminal.” “That absolute coward.” “What are you scared of?” “I thought you were The Science.” “And you can’t answer a question.” “And how much time did the network spend on that?” “How much time did they spend on my vaccination status every week?” “On Taylor and Travis’s wedding?” “Did they do even a minute on Tony Fauci?” “What are you gonna say about me now?” “Obviously it was made in a lab in China.” “That’s not even questionable anymore.” “They suppressed early treatments.” “They lied about where it came from.” @AaronRodgers12 @PatMcAfeeShow
- Sep 4, 20264.6x their median
Whitney Webb is sounding the alarm. Palantir is about to launch hundreds of surveillance satellites in space. And Trump already set the stage to weaponize it against you. How? Under the guise of fighting “domestic terrorists.” “What if it becomes terrorism to criticize a data center?” “Or the surveillance state?” “This October, Satellogic, as a Palantir partner, is going to launch a new set of satellites that Palantir will be using.” “They call this new constellation Merlin.” “And the goal of Merlin … is to predict what will happen using AI in the satellite.” “It’s moving beyond surveilling what’s going on now … to predictive analytics.” “It’s pre-crime.” “Which also will eventually be applied to the war on domestic terrorism.” “It hasn’t happened yet.” “But it’s about to happen.” @_whitneywebb @markgoodw_in
- Sep 20, 20263.8x their median
Theo Von: “Am I crazy to think that there’s a country that’s killing a bunch of children … ” “The government of the country that’s done this seems to own our country … ” “The same country has used a lot of tech companies and scary technology … ” “And some of those companies are now in bed with American surveillance?” “The same companies that are doing the technology that’s part of the murdering in Gaza … have surveillance and technology contracts in our country.” “That seems scary.” “If they’ll kill the people right next to them, what would they do to people here?” “It gets real scary.” @TheoVon
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.7K interactions against 158K followers, an engagement rate of 1.07%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 91K times each, and 1.83% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 57.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.
- What is Holden Culotta's engagement rate on X?
- Holden Culotta (@Holden_Culotta) has an engagement rate of 1.07%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 158,123 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 1.07%, Holden Culotta sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Holden_Culotta have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Holden_Culotta post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.8 posts per day across the measured window.