Back to @HillF1's profile

Damon Hill engagement report

@HillF1 - 235K followers on X

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.144%
of 235K followers
Per impression
1.77%
19K views on a typical post
Reach
8.15%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
340
interactions (median)
Saved
0.005%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.37/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Saturday

Early reading. We have captured 3 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 340 interactions against 235K followers, an engagement rate of 0.144%. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 1.77% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.15% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 46x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #f1, #azerbaijangp, #italiangp. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026. Recurring tags: #f1, #azerbaijangp, #italiangp.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.144%, Damon Hill sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,881 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.68%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.68%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,881 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.68%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video67% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 67% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 126 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 5, 202646x their median

    🚨 | Carlos Sainz unlocks a new type of penalty. He receives a “1 penalty lap” for unlapping himself under the safety car even though he was not a lapped car. #BritishGP #F1 https://t.co/NkzfvA48Lc

    15K677112359874K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 202617x their median

    Drivers to complete every lap of the F1 season so far: - Lewis Hamilton End of list. https://t.co/dsebXoDZ9w

    5.5K306359167K viewsView on X
  • Jul 18, 202614x their median

    It’s the longest and most scenic track on the F1 calendar 🤩 Take in every high-speed twist and turn from Kimi Antonelli’s sensational pole lap around Spa ⏱️ #F1 #BelgianGP @pirellisport https://t.co/GplUC2VSPi

    3.5K4364752493.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 202613x their median

    A Mansell special on Senna! 💪 This overtake completed a through-the-field masterclass from Mansell who had started in P12 🤯 #F1 #HungarianGP @ScuderiaFerrari https://t.co/U9vjGGy6jb

    3.9K3257519458K viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 202611x their median

    Fernando Alonso doesn’t hold back on modern Formula 1. 😬 “In this F1, there’s neither talent, nor speed, nor risk-taking. You just press a button and overtake if you have more power than the car in front.” A brutal criticism of the current regulations. #F1 | #BritishGP https://t.co/tSdsPeP1qQ

    3.0K33719787796K viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 20269.6x their median

    Is this the perfect V10 F1 car?! Damon Hill reunited with his title-winning FW18 on the Goodwood Hill at #FOS 2026 and wasted no time in reaching the chequered flag. What a moment! https://t.co/EwUmdFUf6L

    2.8K3684828216K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 20268.7x their median

    A message from Toto 💬 https://t.co/plsn4RQsDX

    1.7K142674387267K viewsView on X
  • Jun 29, 20268.3x their median

    🇬🇧 Lotus 102C Isuzu V12 Test In 1991, Team Lotus secretly tested an experimental V12 Formula One engine developed by Isuzu. This project, which remains a fascinating "what-if" in motorsport history, centered on the Isuzu P799WE engine.  The Engine (P799WE): A 75-degree, naturally aspirated 3.5-liter V12 designed by a small, four-person team at Isuzu. It was impressively powerful, producing between 640 and 765 bhp depending on the stage of development, which was competitive with the top engines of the era.  The Chassis (Lotus 102C): To test the engine, Lotus modified its 102B chassis to accommodate the V12, renaming the resulting car the Lotus 102C.  The Test: The car underwent system checks at the Hethel test track in late July and early August 1991. The primary on-track evaluation took place at Silverstone in early August 1991, with drivers Johnny Herbert and Mika Häkkinen conducting the tests.  Performance: During the Silverstone test, the car was reportedly around six seconds off the pace of Ayrton Senna’s McLaren-Honda. Several factors contributed to this: the engine lacked an alternator (requiring heavy onboard batteries), the chassis was not optimized for the new V12, and the car was not running on specialized racing fuel or tires.  Reliability: Despite the gap in lap times, the engine proved remarkably reliable during testing and was considered easy to work with by the Lotus mechanics. Economic Collapse: The project coincided with the collapse of the Japanese asset price bubble. This economic instability, combined with Isuzu witnessing the struggles of other Japanese manufacturers (like Yamaha and Subaru) in F1, led them to cancel their entry into the sport.  Isuzu eventually displayed the P799WE engine in a concept vehicle called the Isuzu Como F1, a radical mid-engine pickup truck unveiled at the 1991 Tokyo Motor Show. While the F1 program never materialized, the P799WE remains a symbol of Isuzu's ambitious engineering capabilities during that era. Today, one of the few surviving examples of the engine is kept at the Tamiya headquarters and the Isuzu Plaza museum. 🎥 @F1 #cars #japan #Isuzu #lotus

    2.4K3043443677K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 20265.9x their median

    Bringing the entire team together for our annual team photo at Grove is always one of my favourite days of the year. Formula 1 is the ultimate team sport. Every improvement, every result and every step forward is built on the dedication, skill and commitment of the entire workforce. Thank you to everyone who continues to push us forward.

    1.9K78362263K viewsView on X
  • Jul 11, 20264.5x their median

    Unedited POV of Damon's FW18B run as it roars up the hill 🔊😮‍💨 https://t.co/muB2V2Pp4b

    1.3K208181691K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#f1#azerbaijangp#italiangp

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 340 interactions against 235K followers, an engagement rate of 0.144%. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 1.77% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.15% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 46x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #f1, #azerbaijangp, #italiangp. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Damon Hill's engagement rate on X?
Damon Hill (@HillF1) has an engagement rate of 0.144%, based on the median interactions across 3 original posts from the last 30 days against 235,150 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.144%, Damon Hill sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,881 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @HillF1 have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @HillF1 post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going