Back to @HenryCejudo's profile

Henry Cejudo engagement report

@HenryCejudo - 1.1M followers on X

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.008%
of 1.1M followers
Per impression
0.358%
23K views on a typical post
Reach
2.14%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
81
interactions (median)
Saved
0.004%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.7/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 81 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 0.358% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 190x its own typical post.

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tag: #ufc333.

Compared with accounts its own size

Henry Cejudo's engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 24% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.008%, Henry Cejudo sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video60% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 60% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 146 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 4, 2026190x their median

    Nobody wants to fight Payton Talbott. He’s been ignored for a year. You have to give him the best competition and they need to stop protecting Sean O’Methly. Talbott vs O’Methly next sign the contract!!

    15K39323529356K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202679x their median

    Islam separated himself in the final round. Number one pound for pound gets it done again 🔥 #UFC330

    6.1K208764116K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202643x their median

    Title shot for Arman what an elbow!

    3.4K688039K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 202639x their median

    Hey Deen the Douche-quit playing Duck Duck Henry. The only thing you are great at is getting knocked out. BTW….Congrats on getting your Boyfriend Broner pregnant. You say you’re a fighter but the only thing your fighting is the urge to blow Broner.  You’ve been running from me so fast, you’d think i was a paternity test. @DeenTheGreat 💋

    2.8K12820624174K viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 202628x their median

    ABDUL EL-SAYED: “If you’re coming to kick down what we’re building, I’ll fight you…I was also the kid in AP classes who was getting suspended for fighting.” https://t.co/oPPIwAee9V

    6592181.2K170132K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 202625x their median

    Finally, no more warnings. Referee Taking points. How it should Always be!

    2.0K4011029K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202622x their median

    Van’s takedown defense has looked great and that will be the biggest difference going into the championship rounds

    1.7K118036K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202619x their median

    Who do you guys think Islam should fight next? 🤔 #UFC330

    1.0K1943016229K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202616x their median

    Nice bounce back round for the champ. 3-1 Islam

    1.3K2337057K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202614x their median

    Last one but he looking hella cute I must say 😍 @DeenTheGreat https://t.co/6zvdoFCRBM

    98133836106K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ufc333

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 81 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 0.358% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 190x its own typical post.

What is Henry Cejudo's engagement rate on X?
Henry Cejudo (@HenryCejudo) has an engagement rate of 0.008%, based on the median interactions across 47 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,059,550 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.008%, Henry Cejudo sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @HenryCejudo have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @HenryCejudo post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going