Back to @HellsBellsy's profile

Helen Chamberlain engagement report

@HellsBellsy - 268K followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.069%
of 268K followers
Per impression
0.208%
88K views on a typical post
Reach
32.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
184
interactions (median)
Saved
0.001%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.03/day
active 3% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Monday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 184 interactions against 268K followers, an engagement rate of 0.069%. Posts are seen about 88K times each, and 0.208% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 32.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.1K interactions, about 17x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026. Recurring tag: #farnhamaway.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.069%, Helen Chamberlain sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 104 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 26, 202617x their median

    Seen several posts in the last day or so saying darts is boring because Littler is dominating. Not having it. If you can't enjoy watching someone play like this, then you just don't like darts. That 167 was so filthy.

    2.7K10620026384K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20255.6x their median

    Wayne Mardle is one of my most favourite human beings. That’s all.

    9832020187K viewsView on X
  • Nov 18, 20255.3x their median

    For a little movie fun! https://t.co/hEC8uCFw3k

    341115605693K viewsView on X
  • Feb 25, 20204.7x their median

    Shut up Nutella. You have no business near pancakes #LemonAndSugar

    712479210View on X
  • Apr 26, 20254.5x their median

    πŸ’›πŸ’™ https://t.co/v0evxe2F5k

    805318549K viewsView on X
  • Nov 27, 20253.6x their median

    Rank the Ally Pally stages 🏟️ 1️⃣ 2️⃣ 3️⃣ 4️⃣ #Darts | #pdcworldchampionship https://t.co/Xw5GEPXrzS

    4861511936377K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20263.5x their median

    What a song πŸ‘Œ https://t.co/xFPkeyzOP2

    4542813524376K viewsView on X
  • Feb 20, 20263.5x their median

    Owen Binks making his PDC refereeing debut on the Euro Tour tonight, and @ConnorScutt immediately shithousing him telling him the board wasn't straight... πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

    621932558K viewsView on X
  • Dec 18, 20253.2x their median

    Chalker is all of us rn https://t.co/QMpd0hAxIy

    57746062K viewsView on X
  • Nov 9, 20252.9x their median

    For the second year running... Not announcing Beau Greaves as 3x (and current) World Ladies Darts Champion, is poor.

    495431296K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#farnhamaway

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 184 interactions against 268K followers, an engagement rate of 0.069%. Posts are seen about 88K times each, and 0.208% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 32.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.1K interactions, about 17x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Helen Chamberlain's engagement rate on X?
Helen Chamberlain (@HellsBellsy) has an engagement rate of 0.069%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 268,367 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.069%, Helen Chamberlain sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @HellsBellsy have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @HellsBellsy post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going

Helen Chamberlain (@HellsBellsy) Engagement Rate - 0.069% | PlayerSells