Back to @HelenaVillarO's profile

Helena Villar engagement report

@HelenaVillarO - 193K followers on X

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.316%
of 193K followers
Per impression
2.76%
22K views on a typical post
Reach
11.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
608
interactions (median)
Saved
0.143%
32 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.87/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 608 interactions against 193K followers, an engagement rate of 0.316%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 2.76% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 39K interactions, about 63x its own typical post.

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Helena Villar's engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 72% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.316%, Helena Villar sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video73% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link15% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 73% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 398 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 11, 201263x their median

    If @rihanna is dating @chrisbrown again then she has a death wish. A beater is always a beater--just watch!

    21K9.4K1.9K5.8KView on X
  • Sep 10, 202619x their median

    Están reventando mi ciudad, pero Marlaska dice q la inseguridad es subjetiva. MCETTM https://t.co/pjRYB4yI0I

    7.4K3.8K1266968K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 202618x their median

    Muy bien este chaval de la acampada de Sol cuando le recuerda a Nacho Abad que en su programa y en otros como ‘Horizonte’ se permitan bulos sobre lo ocurrido con Maricarmen. “Sois colaboracionistas de la muerte de Maricarmen”. Acto seguido, Abad le ha despedido https://t.co/e7vcfVKYEB

    8.2K2.1K2671591.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 202616x their median

    So here we have former NATO Secretary General, Jens Stoltenberg, admitting that the war did start in 2014. And from that same year, 2014, NATO has been busy training and arming the Ukraine armed forces. "Unprovoked" 😂😂 https://t.co/ivtXvdYqw1

    6.4K2.8K177225366K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 202614x their median

    La realidad es que 2 colombianas acaban con todas las argentinas y mexicanas juntas https://t.co/pOWZvOqrVt

    7.4K263772284909K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20268.1x their median

    Voy a votar no vaya a ser que venga la derecha y me suba la edad de jubilación a 67 años, el IRPF al 60%,ponga listas de espera de 2 años y me llene el país de mano de obra barata para bajar los salarios como pide la patronal.

    4.2K703471298K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20266.4x their median

    🇺🇸🇲🇭EEUU detonó en el océano Pacífico algunas de las bombas nucleares más potentes del mundo. Viajo hasta la zona cero para dar cuenta del legado atómico y hablar con las víctimas. Por primera vez en la historia, un medio de habla hispana consigue pisar y comprobar el estado de la temida cúpula radiactiva de Runit. (HILO)

    2.3K1.5K353255K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20266.3x their median

    No he dejado de repetir que uno de los objetivos principales del Marruecos es generar un éxodo masivo de la población autóctona de Ceuta y poco a poco ir generando un cambio demográfico que en un futuro hago posible la entrega de Ceuta y Melilla, exactamente como en el Sáhara. https://t.co/AdSP02ZdwL

    2.5K1.2K772535K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20266.2x their median

    El problema de la educación española no es que los alumnos no sepan matemáticas o comprensión lectora. Es algo más terrible: ha desaparecido el deseo de conocimiento, y el esfuerzo por adquirirlo. No es un problema de la educación. Es este mundo, es el triunfo de la ignorancia.

    2.8K7681367161K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20265.2x their median

    Israel entra en la campaña electoral española haciendo apología del holocausto palestino con estos autobuses circulando por calles de España. Si el gobierno español hubiera roto todas las relaciones, incluidas diplomáticas, esta obscenidad del régimen genocida no sería posible. https://t.co/Mh0qOiVkQU

    1.8K1.1K14610464K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 608 interactions against 193K followers, an engagement rate of 0.316%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 2.76% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 39K interactions, about 63x its own typical post.

What is Helena Villar's engagement rate on X?
Helena Villar (@HelenaVillarO) has an engagement rate of 0.316%, based on the median interactions across 26 original posts from the last 30 days against 192,731 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.316%, Helena Villar sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @HelenaVillarO have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @HelenaVillarO post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going