Back to @HealthRanger's profile

HealthRanger engagement report

@HealthRanger - 415K followers on X

Measured over 97 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.087%
of 415K followers
Per impression
2.53%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
3.43%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
350
interactions (median)
Saved
0.238%
33 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
7/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 350 interactions against 415K followers, an engagement rate of 0.087%. Measured over 97 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 2.53% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 97 posts sampled, 49% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 62K interactions, about 176x its own typical post.

Measured over 97 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

HealthRanger's engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 74% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.087%, HealthRanger sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video49% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link25% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 49% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 25% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 386 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 31, 2026176x their median

    Netanyahu appeals to Israeli voters by boasting that he manipulated Trump: “it took a long time to get the US to come to its senses” but I finally got it to attack Iran due to my “influence” over its leaders through “1000 hours on American television” https://t.co/hwrswfkbv2

    42K17K1.5K1.5K3.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2026160x their median

    BREAKING: Trump says he will give every adult citizen $5,000 if GOP wins the midterms Idiocracy was so far ahead of its time 🤣 https://t.co/FQdxAfssoT

    46K8.4K1.1K8903.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202672x their median

    We've become North Korea with the propaganda... https://t.co/d66HA8Cnn3

    22K1.8K764182537K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202653x their median

    BREAKING: Iran is launching ballistic missiles from all over the country, in a large-scale wave. So far, Tehran, Karaj, East Azerbaijan, Urmia, West Azerbaijan, Zanjan, Shiraz, Lorestan and Khorramabad. Multiple explosions at the Muwaffaq Salti US base in Jordan minutes ago, the first target.

    15K2.7K2802432.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202645x their median

    https://t.co/oqhEIsoOG5

    13K2.0K483169536K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202642x their median

    This is insane China didn’t use a mRNA vaccine for Covid This is the first I’m hearing about this, and it’s true. China did not authorize Pfizer or Moderna mRNA vaccines, instead China rolled out their own “inactivated-virus and viral-vector products, not mRNA” https://t.co/lswj4hWUQR

    9.5K4.3K601285397K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202637x their median

    Trump is of course a liar about using Venezuelan heavy crude oil to refill the SPR. The SPR has strict quality requirements such as a maximum of 1.99% sulfur content. Venezuelan oil is 5.7% sulfur, which is considered insanely "sour." It also happens to be highly acidic which would eat away at the storage cave walls, likely causing cave-ins and collapse. There are other requirements, too, such as API gravity. Venezuelan oil doesn't qualify. If you pour it in, you can never get it back out. Too sludgy. It basically just becomes a giant "tar cave" of sludge that's unpumpable. So once again, Trump is lying about the whole thing. There's much more to this story, too, such as the fact that the 65 billion barrels of oil can't possibly be tapped without at least A FULL DECADE of infrastructure investment in Venezuela, and at least $100 billion in investment funds, plus you have to find all the experts around the world who know how to do these things and somehow entice them to move to what is effectively a war zone where local resistance groups will be targeting them constantly. So nope, your gas prices aren't going to get any better tomorrow. It's all just smoke and mirrors. As usual.

    9.3K3.0K446235261K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202627x their median

    Is this not murder? Unbelievable video just released of Nashville Police sentencing a man with a sword to death without a trial. Zero verbal commands. Chief John Drake decommissions Officer Baney after a preliminary review. https://t.co/dVFCHZUW5d

    7.0K6201.6K2121.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 202625x their median

    One and done fence posts, and dimensional building material. This is peak American ingenuity. https://t.co/W4KMQmArFs 6052025192 This is what I will be building all my fences out of from here on out, and I got deck ideas for his 2x6 and 4x8 sheet. Hit this guy up, he is just like us, This dude is Henry Ford level genius.

    7.1K1.3K30257229K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202624x their median

    1,139 Israelis died on October 7, 2023. More than 1,000 were killed by Israeli tank and helicopter fire. ​The charred bodies of the Israeli victims prove the use of heavy weapons—while Hamas forces carried only light weapons and rifles. https://t.co/zeZaGrM14X

    5.1K2.7K246229295K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 350 interactions against 415K followers, an engagement rate of 0.087%. Measured over 97 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 2.53% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 97 posts sampled, 49% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 62K interactions, about 176x its own typical post.

What is HealthRanger's engagement rate on X?
HealthRanger (@HealthRanger) has an engagement rate of 0.087%, based on the median interactions across 97 original posts from the last 30 days against 414,901 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.087%, HealthRanger sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @HealthRanger have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @HealthRanger post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going