He Qinglian engagement report
@HeQinglian - 246K followers on X
Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 138 interactions against 246K followers, an engagement rate of 0.056%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.726% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.74% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 35% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 262x its own typical post.
Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
He Qinglian's engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 34% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.056%, He Qinglian sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 35% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 29% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 35% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 29% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 826 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 14, 2026262x their median
W Szwecji wygrywa lewica (globaliści), a sondaże pokazują, że głosowało na nich ponad 70% najeźdźców... teraz rozumiecie już o co chodzi w sprowadzaniu imigrantów ⁉️ Od Szwecji rozpoczyna się prawdziwy koniec Europy... https://t.co/xGEaYDXCDw
- Sep 1, 2026138x their median
El nuevo trend de las brujas desquiciadas es grabarse simulando que “LASTIMAN” a sus hijos bebés por la “ANSIEDAD POSTPARTO” El feminismo les arruinó el cerebro https://t.co/DvatLVMR05
- Sep 2, 202694x their median
Trump tosses Carney into Lake America 🤣😭 https://t.co/VPdzimfeD4
- Jan 12, 202121x their median
查尔斯·蒂利在《民主》一书中列举的去民主化有四个标志: 1、自由公正的选举恶化,出现大选被操纵的现象;2、言论自由,新闻自由和结社自由权受到削弱,削弱了政治反对派挑战政府的能力;3、法治对政府司法和官僚约束被削弱,司法独立受到威胁;4、政府制造或过分强调国家安全威胁,以制造一种“危机感”
- Sep 4, 20265.8x their median
从弗洛伊德案就注意到美帝礼崩乐坏:尽忠职守的警察蹲了大狱,劣迹斑斑的罪犯成了国家英雄。舆情每次都给罪犯站台:偷渡的游民、枪杀辩论者的凶手、零元购的混混、假结婚诈骗的议员,无一得到应有的惩罚,个个混的风生水起。到今天杀害三个亲子还广受同情。这种价值颠倒的社会不亡没天理了。
- Sep 2, 20265.0x their median
全球债券崩盘中,其中一个重要原因就是令人头痛的通胀。但唯独中国却在头痛通缩。大家有没有想过一个问题,论经济的底子,中国其实不差,具备一切繁荣的基本要素,但经济就是热不起来。你说居民没信心吧,也确实是。但有时候中国人也很亢奋,对东升西降深信不疑。这种矛盾如何解释?我发现除了用心理学的第一性原理,无法解释中国的经济。但用心理学不但可以解释,还能预测未来路径。经济行为归根结底是社会行为,是心理学的范畴。
- Aug 22, 20264.0x their median
🚨重大突发:爱泼斯坦幸存者刚刚宣布,他们将发布自己的名单。 “我们知道谁虐待了我们。我们看到谁来了又走了。这份名单将由幸存者主导——为幸存者而发布。” 政府拖延了。 现在受害者们自己动手了。 https://t.co/7bLpNuFd8z
- Aug 22, 20263.8x their median
作家李娟有关母亲的一段文字: 年少时,母亲喊她,就因为她没有及时应声,暴怒的母亲随手抄起酒瓶砸向她的眉骨,缝了三针,留下终身疤痕。 她珍藏的私人信件,被母亲当众抢走、大声朗读,一边读一边嘲讽她的细腻与敏感,让她在众人面前尊严尽失、崩溃大哭。 在学校被老师罚对自己的脸扇巴掌,扇到脸肿,回家不敢告诉母亲,只因她知道,母亲只会发泄自己的怒火,并不会真正帮助自己解决问题,而发泄之后的一切后果,都还是由自己承担。 她在书中曾两次悲凉的写道:“若我们俩是夫妻,早就离婚几百次了。” 而最让人无力的,是母亲会自动抹去所有伤人的行为,一辈子只记得自己的辛苦付出,从不记得自己如何刺伤过女儿。 一旦李娟试图回望伤痛,得到的永远是指责:你记仇、你不孝、你不懂感恩。 微微评:她的母亲太知道怎么伤害她了!所以她十年不和母亲联系是对的。所以人一定要在成年后完成一次精神上的弑父弑母!完成精神上人格上的升级。
- Aug 21, 20262.9x their median
中国这些年被抄家的贪官富商逾万,其中可与清代曹雪芹家规格相若的家族也有,最出名的是薄瓜瓜,但没人能够写出《红楼梦》来。 以这两天刷屏的许家印恒大家族为例,父子3人全部获刑,仅有技术性离婚的前妻丁玉梅仍滞留海外,与其两名未成年子女(以及两名未成年孙子)一同在英国伦敦生活。 在资产被严格冻结前,他们日常在瑞士与伦敦之间的居住、出行,以及昂贵的医疗费和学费,全部由丁玉梅通过此前从恒大套现的离岸资金进行支付。价值2.1亿英镑的豪宅、泰晤士河畔33套公寓及多国银行存款)已全部被司法“合围”冻结。 目前,英国法院为了保障未成年子女的抚养和基本人道生存需求,仅允许丁玉梅每月支取最高2万英镑(约合18万元人民币)作为全家人的基本生活费。这笔钱在昂贵的伦敦连豪宅的物业管理费和日常管家开销都不够,此前挥金如土、极度奢华的贵族留学生活已经难以为继。这两名未成年子女并不在本次国内的刑事犯罪被告名单中,但他们作为底层受益人的海外信托和财产,目前正处于被香港及英美法院全球全额追偿的司法风暴中心。 目前还有许的小女儿许熙芸未被列入司法追责名单。据说这是由于她长期刻意远离恒大的核心业务、融资运作及资金转移架构。 许家的恒大歌舞团,比当初贾府的戏班子排场大多了。 许家的故事拍成电视剧,一定很有故事性。中国的编剧们也很苦,守着最好的剧源却无法写。 不过,能逃的还是会逃,因为不逃肯定死,逃了的或许有生机。天网再密,总有漏网之鱼。
- Sep 10, 20262.3x their median
这是我几年前写的,制度论已破产。恍如隔世,虽然如今各种名词都在变,政策也在变,执政团体也变了,但是悲哀的是,大趋势已经确定了。/制度论已经破产!本人总结出专制社会的9大特色,和法律上是什么制度没有必然的关系。有的地方是一向的专制;有的地方正扛着民主的大旗奔向专制;有的地方马上就快要成为“灯塔遗址”,但仍有一帮“灯塔教徒”在膜拜。但请大家仔细一条一条地读一读,看看你生活、工作、学习、甚至崇尚向往的地方中了几条? 1. 缺乏客观、公正的主流媒体,媒体只是政治的喉舌,只会一惊一乍玩弄民众情绪。 2. 政治正确、DEI独裁,如LGBTQ团体进校园,但法律禁止教会进入。 3. 政客不讲政策只讲政治,只喊口号、不做实事。 4. 选择性执法、双标政策,把法律用作整治政治异己的武器。 5. 搞阶级分化、斗争,民众争当特权阶级或最大受害者。 6. 天天抓间谍,反外部势力、反大外宣、反渗透。全民行动起来防范反动份子。 7. 打着自由民主的大旗打压言论自由,谁反对,就给谁扣上反民主的大帽子。 8. 民众被民粹裹挟到了反常识的地步,年轻人成为极左的红卫兵,陪审团成为报复政治异己的工具。 9. 反对党不是争理念、争政策,而是争统治权,谁上台都是换汤不换药,继续上面8条的专制。 正如我前面所说,有的地方是一向的专制,有的地方正扛着民主的大旗奔向专制。“灯塔教徒们”天天膜拜的灯塔已经被左派折腾得摇摇欲坠了,几乎快变成“民主灯塔遗址”了。而他们不去反思,而是马上去膜拜“新民主灯塔”,其实还没建好,就已经快塌了,更有甚者,正在往索多玛的火坑里跳。 我一直坚信,民主是个好东西,但是民主不是单一绝对要素,没有信仰的支撑,左派掌权是必然趋势,然后左派一定会打着自由民主的大旗搞DEI式的专制,谁反对,谁就会被扣上落后歧视、反民主、反自由的大帽子。制度论早就破产了,好的制度不能决定一切,法律是死的,人是活的,民众的道德和信仰非常重要。在道德败坏的地方,民主必将亲手杀死民主。 人若没有信仰,人的罪性一定要建设巴别塔。自以为追求民主自由、世界大同、大爱无疆的高尚理想,其实沦落为左胶、乌托邦,搞出来DEI、文革式的悲剧。如动物农庄里的话:人人平等,但有些人更平等。Go woke go broke。最终如同福山写出“历史终结论”一样,自认为有了民主就世界大同,人类的历史从此终结,最后自己也承认被现实啪啪打脸。 在罪中放荡堕落不是真自由。所以宣传极端性开放、青少年变性的所谓平权组织可以进校园宣讲,但是福音团体却被法律禁止进校园,这是真自由吗?耶稣说:“我实实在在地告诉你们,所有犯罪的就是罪的奴仆。”又说“你们必晓得真理,真理必叫你们得以自由”。
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 138 interactions against 246K followers, an engagement rate of 0.056%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.726% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.74% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 35% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 262x its own typical post.
- What is He Qinglian's engagement rate on X?
- He Qinglian (@HeQinglian) has an engagement rate of 0.056%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 245,680 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.056%, He Qinglian sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @HeQinglian have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @HeQinglian post?
- Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.7 posts per day across the measured window.