He Qinglian engagement report
@HeQinglian - 246K followers on X
Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 149 interactions against 246K followers, an engagement rate of 0.061%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 0.601% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 28% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 32% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 128x its own typical post.
Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
He Qinglian's engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 34% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.061%, He Qinglian sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.499% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 119.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 28% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 32% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 28% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 32% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 805 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 1, 2026128x their median
El nuevo trend de las brujas desquiciadas es grabarse simulando que “LASTIMAN” a sus hijos bebés por la “ANSIEDAD POSTPARTO” El feminismo les arruinó el cerebro https://t.co/DvatLVMR05
- Sep 2, 202687x their median
Trump tosses Carney into Lake America 🤣😭 https://t.co/VPdzimfeD4
- Jan 12, 202119x their median
查尔斯·蒂利在《民主》一书中列举的去民主化有四个标志: 1、自由公正的选举恶化,出现大选被操纵的现象;2、言论自由,新闻自由和结社自由权受到削弱,削弱了政治反对派挑战政府的能力;3、法治对政府司法和官僚约束被削弱,司法独立受到威胁;4、政府制造或过分强调国家安全威胁,以制造一种“危机感”
- Sep 4, 20265.4x their median
从弗洛伊德案就注意到美帝礼崩乐坏:尽忠职守的警察蹲了大狱,劣迹斑斑的罪犯成了国家英雄。舆情每次都给罪犯站台:偷渡的游民、枪杀辩论者的凶手、零元购的混混、假结婚诈骗的议员,无一得到应有的惩罚,个个混的风生水起。到今天杀害三个亲子还广受同情。这种价值颠倒的社会不亡没天理了。
- Sep 2, 20264.6x their median
全球债券崩盘中,其中一个重要原因就是令人头痛的通胀。但唯独中国却在头痛通缩。大家有没有想过一个问题,论经济的底子,中国其实不差,具备一切繁荣的基本要素,但经济就是热不起来。你说居民没信心吧,也确实是。但有时候中国人也很亢奋,对东升西降深信不疑。这种矛盾如何解释?我发现除了用心理学的第一性原理,无法解释中国的经济。但用心理学不但可以解释,还能预测未来路径。经济行为归根结底是社会行为,是心理学的范畴。
- Aug 22, 20263.7x their median
🚨重大突发:爱泼斯坦幸存者刚刚宣布,他们将发布自己的名单。 “我们知道谁虐待了我们。我们看到谁来了又走了。这份名单将由幸存者主导——为幸存者而发布。” 政府拖延了。 现在受害者们自己动手了。 https://t.co/7bLpNuFd8z
- Aug 22, 20263.6x their median
作家李娟有关母亲的一段文字: 年少时,母亲喊她,就因为她没有及时应声,暴怒的母亲随手抄起酒瓶砸向她的眉骨,缝了三针,留下终身疤痕。 她珍藏的私人信件,被母亲当众抢走、大声朗读,一边读一边嘲讽她的细腻与敏感,让她在众人面前尊严尽失、崩溃大哭。 在学校被老师罚对自己的脸扇巴掌,扇到脸肿,回家不敢告诉母亲,只因她知道,母亲只会发泄自己的怒火,并不会真正帮助自己解决问题,而发泄之后的一切后果,都还是由自己承担。 她在书中曾两次悲凉的写道:“若我们俩是夫妻,早就离婚几百次了。” 而最让人无力的,是母亲会自动抹去所有伤人的行为,一辈子只记得自己的辛苦付出,从不记得自己如何刺伤过女儿。 一旦李娟试图回望伤痛,得到的永远是指责:你记仇、你不孝、你不懂感恩。 微微评:她的母亲太知道怎么伤害她了!所以她十年不和母亲联系是对的。所以人一定要在成年后完成一次精神上的弑父弑母!完成精神上人格上的升级。
- Aug 21, 20262.7x their median
中国这些年被抄家的贪官富商逾万,其中可与清代曹雪芹家规格相若的家族也有,最出名的是薄瓜瓜,但没人能够写出《红楼梦》来。 以这两天刷屏的许家印恒大家族为例,父子3人全部获刑,仅有技术性离婚的前妻丁玉梅仍滞留海外,与其两名未成年子女(以及两名未成年孙子)一同在英国伦敦生活。 在资产被严格冻结前,他们日常在瑞士与伦敦之间的居住、出行,以及昂贵的医疗费和学费,全部由丁玉梅通过此前从恒大套现的离岸资金进行支付。价值2.1亿英镑的豪宅、泰晤士河畔33套公寓及多国银行存款)已全部被司法“合围”冻结。 目前,英国法院为了保障未成年子女的抚养和基本人道生存需求,仅允许丁玉梅每月支取最高2万英镑(约合18万元人民币)作为全家人的基本生活费。这笔钱在昂贵的伦敦连豪宅的物业管理费和日常管家开销都不够,此前挥金如土、极度奢华的贵族留学生活已经难以为继。这两名未成年子女并不在本次国内的刑事犯罪被告名单中,但他们作为底层受益人的海外信托和财产,目前正处于被香港及英美法院全球全额追偿的司法风暴中心。 目前还有许的小女儿许熙芸未被列入司法追责名单。据说这是由于她长期刻意远离恒大的核心业务、融资运作及资金转移架构。 许家的恒大歌舞团,比当初贾府的戏班子排场大多了。 许家的故事拍成电视剧,一定很有故事性。中国的编剧们也很苦,守着最好的剧源却无法写。 不过,能逃的还是会逃,因为不逃肯定死,逃了的或许有生机。天网再密,总有漏网之鱼。
- Sep 4, 20261.9x their median
🚨🔥我的天!川普总统刚刚宣布:如果美联储不降息,美国将停止与所有对美保持贸易顺差的国家进行贸易! 而就在刚刚公布的就业数据中,就业增长远超预期! 川普表示: “降息,否则我就停止与那些对美国存在贸易顺差的国家进行贸易! 美国最高法院在那项荒谬且代价高昂的关税裁决中,也强烈确认了‘总统’拥有这项绝对权力。这比关税更好!” “美联储理事会,在新的优秀领导者带领下,必须变得明智起来——这一次做美国的爱国者! 高利率让美国处于极其不公平的竞争劣势,我绝不会允许这种情况发生!” “降低利率! 因为美国的信用状况比不久前强大得多!一个强大的国家,就应该拥有更低的利率——信用越强,利率就应该越低! 就这么简单!” “我们应该拥有全世界最低的利率,就像‘过去的好日子’一样。如果没有美国同意让这些国家享受巨额贸易顺差,他们根本不可能维持这种局面——而我们可以立即停止这种情况。届时,他们也就不再被视为所谓的金融‘精英’国家!” 🔥 这可是一个非常强硬的信号!
- Sep 5, 20261.6x their median
美国麻州36岁前产房护士琳赛·克兰西(Lindsay Clancy)勒死三名年幼子女案,在2026年9月因11名陪审员倾向判其精神失常无罪、仅1人反对导致无法达成全体一致而最终流审的案件,外人看了很奇怪,建议大家找部旧剧《庭审专家》(Bull)来看,看后会大涨知识。这部剧展示了陪审员挑选过程如何被算计操控。 这部剧将传统上被视为“随机且公正”的陪审团挑选过程,变成了一场高科技的心理战和行为科学计算。在现实的美国法律体系中,这种对陪审团的筛选和“操纵”被称为科学陪审团挑选(Scientific Jury Selection)。虽然电视剧为了戏剧效果进行了夸张,但它揭示了三个核心的现实操控手段: 深入的背景起底:咨询团队会利用大数据、社交媒体足迹、选民登记记录以及消费习惯,在开庭前对潜在的陪审员建立极其精准的心理画像。 暗中引导的模拟法庭:通过招募与真实陪审员背景高度相似的“影子陪审团”(Mirror Juries),在庭外实时测试不同的辩护策略和措辞,从而精准预测真实陪审团的心理反应。 利用程序规则合法剔除:律师可以通过“有因回避”(Challenge for Cause)或数量有限的“无因回避”(Peremptory Challenge),在法庭上有选择性地除掉那些可能带有潜在敌意或特定偏见的陪审员。这种高度商业化和技术化的干预,往往让人们对司法系统的绝对公正性产生反思。 我很希望媒体能挖一下琳赛·克兰西案陪审员挑选过程。不过,在纽约、加州、麻省以及华盛顿特区这类蓝得发黑的左派各州,发生什么都有可能。
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 149 interactions against 246K followers, an engagement rate of 0.061%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 0.601% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 28% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 32% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 128x its own typical post.
- What is He Qinglian's engagement rate on X?
- He Qinglian (@HeQinglian) has an engagement rate of 0.061%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 245,608 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.061%, He Qinglian sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @HeQinglian have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @HeQinglian post?
- Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.47 posts per day across the measured window.