Back to @He45H's profile

عناد🎙️ engagement report

@He45H - 396K followers on X

Measured over 50 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.008%
of 396K followers
Per impression
0.149%
22K views on a typical post
Reach
5.50%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
32
interactions (median)
Saved
0.048%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.67/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 32 interactions against 396K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 50 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.149% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 50 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.6K interactions, about 183x its own typical post.

Measured over 50 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026. Recurring tag: #القوات_البحرية.

Compared with accounts its own size

عناد🎙️'s engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 11% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.008%, عناد🎙️ sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video80% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 80% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 79 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 23, 2026183x their median

    اشوفه مضر بالصحة حتى والصوت حلو 🔥😭 https://t.co/wEPOKnvTbg

    2.3K103158484.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202650x their median

    https://t.co/GP0VoGOuSx

    1.0K16339891.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202632x their median

    عاجل الان: بدء خطاب رئيس اليمن 🇾🇪 ، بنشر لكم الملخص و السياق … هذا فيديو الخطاب كامل 16 دقيقة👇: https://t.co/fm0vvpuJSF

    842134507265K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202625x their median

    المعلمة محترفة قامت باصطياد الغش ببراعة https://t.co/0HzQVl4S7F

    726404031.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202622x their median

    这玩法怎么看都像桌球,只不过球和桌子都换了个版本。 https://t.co/sY92A897Dg

    656381681.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202618x their median

    quick and easy pasta https://t.co/vM9GdM0tGm

    507713191K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 202615x their median

    مضغوط مضغوط في المخ والله ..🔥💔 https://t.co/4WJGwu5d0O

    40536311154K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 202610x their median

    ودي اعرف وش فوائد اكل شحم الابل .. 🔥 https://t.co/aFzW0Z9IK3

    25916514514K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20268.0x their median

    كبسة ملح وبصل .. وهذي النتيجة 🔥 https://t.co/juq49miplc

    2222013063K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20267.3x their median

    هذا فطور مرتب ..🔥 https://t.co/5VXwZvsgP1

    210221024K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#القوات_البحرية

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 32 interactions against 396K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 50 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.149% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 50 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.6K interactions, about 183x its own typical post.

What is عناد🎙️'s engagement rate on X?
عناد🎙️ (@He45H) has an engagement rate of 0.008%, based on the median interactions across 50 original posts from the last 30 days against 395,988 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.008%, عناد🎙️ sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @He45H have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @He45H post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going