Back to @Hawk's profile

Andrew Hawkins engagement report

@Hawk - 117K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.033%
of 117K followers
Per impression
0.433%
9.0K views on a typical post
Reach
7.71%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
39
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.17/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 39 interactions against 117K followers, an engagement rate of 0.033%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.0K times each, and 0.433% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.73% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 77K interactions, about 1978x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #gocanes, #nfllive.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026. Recurring tags: #gocanes, #nfllive.

Compared with accounts its own size

Andrew Hawkins's engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 22% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.033%, Andrew Hawkins sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video36% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link9% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 36% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 98 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 18, 20261978x their median

    I can’t even imagine John Harbaughs reaction to seeing this LOL https://t.co/hCfiCvwCxV

    71K3.1K1.5K1.8K15M viewsView on X
  • Jun 28, 2026305x their median

    Hey.. This is the #1 HS basketball player in America. Nobody else at this size is doing this. Marcus Spears Jr. 🎥Shotbyrochaa https://t.co/OnLDbLy55y

    11K7411721822.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026122x their median

    65 yard Touchdown 1st play of the game https://t.co/on5ZiKHykw

    4.5K781041225.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 2026111x their median

    Only 1 person can run full speed & stop on two nickels… 🏈 https://t.co/jDqGLwht1I

    4.0K2337131159K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202661x their median

    Many fans have pushed for the NFL to add an “interception caused by receiver” stat to differentiate QB mistakes from interceptions that are largely out of their control. Is this play a perfect example of why that stat should exist? 🤔 https://t.co/F31BUOwTuS

    1.9K76281104481K viewsView on X
  • Jun 18, 202650x their median

    ESPN re-signed NFL analyst Jason McCourty to an exclusive multi-year agreement. https://t.co/MyiaZ3CfLC

    1.7K1329723409K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202633x their median

    MICHIGAN HAIL MARY MIRACLE OH MY GOODNESS 〽️ https://t.co/7kd2ZqOWfP

    1.1K61117321.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 202615x their median

    Shedeur Sanders grinding with the workouts 😤😤😤 https://t.co/3OTEDVxgxN

    53932174138K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 202614x their median

    The podcast game misses us @joethomas73 @ThomaHawkShow https://t.co/ZpXaFpkqZ3

    4931523134K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 202612x their median

    Just -Go Cleveland. 🫡😤 https://t.co/U2MZhBKar4

    440182149K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#gocanes#nfllive

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 39 interactions against 117K followers, an engagement rate of 0.033%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.0K times each, and 0.433% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.73% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 77K interactions, about 1978x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #gocanes, #nfllive.

What is Andrew Hawkins's engagement rate on X?
Andrew Hawkins (@Hawk) has an engagement rate of 0.033%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 116,564 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.033%, Andrew Hawkins sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Hawk have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Hawk post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going