حسن إسميك engagement report
@HasanIsmaik - 1.1M followers on X
Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 787 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.069%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 529K times each, and 0.149% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 46.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 22% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 25K interactions, about 32x its own typical post.
Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
حسن إسميك's engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 10% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.069%, حسن إسميك sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.695% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 83.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 22% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 22% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 524 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jun 5, 202632x their median
جوهر الإيمان الحقيقي لا يقتصر على المظاهر الطقسية أو التوجه لجهة معينة، بل يتجلى في التصديق القلبي بالغيبيات وترجمته إلى سلوك عملي. يظهر ذلك في الإحسان للخلق كبذل المال وصلة الأرحام وإغاثة المحتاجين وفك الأسرى، والالتزام بحقوق الله من صلاة وزكاة ووفاء بالعهود وصبر عند الشدائد. من جمع بين صدق العقيدة وإخلاص العمل فهو الصادق المتقي حقاً. جمعة مباركة
- Oct 23, 202622x their median
أعظم ما نُهدي به أنفسنا في يوم الجمعة هو كثرة الصلاة على رسول الله ﷺ، فهي جلاء للهموم ومغفرة للذنوب. اللَّهُمَّ صَلِّ وَسَلِّمْ وَبَارِكْ على نبينا محمد وعلى آله وصحبه أجمعين. جُمعة طيبة ومباركة عامرَة بذكر الله والصلاة على نبيه. https://t.co/YlZJV3SsoQ
- Apr 12, 20263.7x their median
Dear Readers, Donald Trump is not like any other U.S. president. He may appear to some as temperamental, sharp in tone, and quick to anger, but at his core he is a highly intelligent and stubborn figure who knows exactly what he wants and how to achieve it. Behind the apparent chaos he creates lies a precise, calculating mind—one that weighs its steps with a balance of fire and cunning. Moreover, he can read his opponents as if they were open pages in a book. He is neither as the media portrays him nor as his opponents wish him to be. Aside from his bombastic rhetoric, he neither deceives nor is easily deceived. He detects attempts at maneuvering before they begin and rejects without accomodation any delay. This is why Iran has not been fortunate in his return to the White House, as it now faces a man who looks at it with an eye that distinguishes between rhetoric and substance, intentions and tactics. Yet Trump is not bloodthirsty. He opposes wars in principle and believes that limited sacrifice may be the price of saving an entire nation. He understands that if the ruling elite in Iran do not change their approach, their continued rule means the continued suffering of the people. He is also aware that nearly 90 million Iranians live between poverty and the lower middle class, aspiring to rebuild their country much as Germany did after World War II when it transformed itself into a strong and respected nation in which citizens enjoy stability and confidence in the future. From this perspective, Trump focuses on reviving the interests of people rather than regimes, viewing the change of ruling elites—despite its cost—as a gateway to comprehensive progress that benefits millions of Iranians. Iran is but one example among many. Trump does not forget, nor does he leave matters unresolved. He returns to complex files with a sharp focus that allows for calculated opportunities that other leaders missed or dismissed. The Syrian file, for instance, is not far from his attention. Those who believe they have bypassed or deceived Trump on this issue will soon discover they are facing a man who neither forgets nor retreats until he imposes his terms in full. It is also evident that he is steadily moving toward confronting authoritarian regimes, as his logic is rooted in breaking the closed cycles of oppression people suffer from within such systems. Venezuela was first, Iran is now, and perhaps Cuba will follow. At the same time, Trump is loyal and sincere to those who respect him or deal with him in good faith. Behind his harsh language is a practical individual who values work and achievement and seeks to accomplish something meaningful for his country that changes reality for the better. His blunt candor may be seen by some as a flaw, but he considers it a strength, as clarity for him is a virtue, not a shortcoming. For this reason, those who see him as merely an outlier among U.S. presidents do not truly understand him. He has established an approach that will endure as long as America seeks to renew its strength: Make America Great Again. This is not just a slogan, but a doctrine Donald J. Trump initiated—one that will persist and only grow stronger and more influential over time.
- Oct 26, 20264.2x their median
هل تستطيع شجرة أن تروي تاريخ إمبراطورية؟ فازت الباحثة صوفي بينكهام بجائزة بوشكين هاوس للكتاب عن مؤلفها الذي يقرأ تاريخ روسيا وإمبراطورياتها من خلال الغابات. أحب هذه الفكرة لأنها تخرجنا من التاريخ المألوف، حيث تحتكر الحروب والانتصارات المشهد. ماذا لو قرأنا تاريخ منطقتنا من خلال دجلة والفرات والنيل والصحراء، وتأملنا كيف أسهمت الجغرافيا والموارد في تشكيل المجتمعات؟ علينا أن نعيد النظر إلى الطبيعة ليس باعتبارها مجرد مسرح للتاريخ، بل أحد المشاركين في صناعته.
- Oct 16, 20264.1x their median
يا رب لو أن قلبي شكّ لم يك مؤمناً بكريم عفوك ما غوى وعصاكا جمعة مباركة https://t.co/kyDup3nZeI
- May 4, 20264.0x their median
الإمارات تُدين بشدة تجدد العدوان الإيراني الغادر باستخدام الصواريخ والطائرات المسيّرة https://t.co/1fAwX6GFuK
- May 26, 20262.4x their median
﷽ ﴿الْحَجُّ أَشْهُرٌ مَّعْلُومَاتٌ ۚ فَمَن فَرَضَ فِيهِنَّ الْحَجَّ فَلَا رَفَثَ وَلَا فُسُوقَ وَلَا جِدَالَ فِي الْحَجِّ ۗ وَمَا تَفْعَلُوا مِنْ خَيْرٍ يَعْلَمْهُ اللَّهُ ۗ وَتَزَوَّدُوا فَإِنَّ خَيْرَ الزَّادِ التَّقْوَىٰ ۚ وَاتَّقُونِ يَا أُولِي الْأَلْبَابِ (197) لَيْسَ عَلَيْكُمْ جُنَاحٌ أَن تَبْتَغُوا فَضْلًا مِّن رَّبِّكُمْ ۚ فَإِذَا أَفَضْتُم مِّنْ عَرَفَاتٍ فَاذْكُرُوا اللَّهَ عِندَ الْمَشْعَرِ الْحَرَامِ ۖ وَاذْكُرُوهُ كَمَا هَدَاكُمْ وَإِن كُنتُم مِّن قَبْلِهِ لَمِنَ الضَّالِّينَ (198) ثُمَّ أَفِيضُوا مِنْ حَيْثُ أَفَاضَ النَّاسُ وَاسْتَغْفِرُوا اللَّهَ ۚ إِنَّ اللَّهَ غَفُورٌ رَّحِيمٌ (199)﴾ [البقرة: 197-199]
- May 27, 20262.4x their median
كل عام وأنتم بخير
- May 5, 20262.1x their median
لا يمر المجتمع الشيعي في لبنان اليوم بأزمة سياسية عابرة، بل بلحظة إعادة تعريف عميقة لموقعه داخل الدولة، بعد أن اهتزت المعادلة التي قام عليها نفوذ حزب الله لعقود طويلة: الحماية، والرعاية، واحتكار السردية. اقرأ المقال كاملاً عبر الرابط 👈 https://t.co/tGS9UyCtDC @Annahar https://t.co/BIjyYTEFtJ
- Aug 21, 20262.0x their median
بين "الفارسي" و"العربي"... من يملك الخليج فعلاً؟ نشر محمد باقر قاليباف صورته وخلفه "الخليج الفارسي"، فردّ هيبت الحلبوسي بصورة وخلفه "الخليج العربي". مشهد يبدو كأنه معركة هوية: هذا يقول أنا فارسي، وذاك يرد أنا عربي. لكن بينما نتجادل نحن على الاسم، تنظر القوى الكبرى إلى الخليج بلغة مختلفة: النفوذ، والطاقة، والممرات البحرية، والتكنولوجيا، وموازين القوة. نحن نتجادل على الاسم، وغيرنا يتجادل على القوة. لا "الخليج الفارسي" يجعل إيران أكثر ازدهاراً، ولا "الخليج العربي" يجعل القرار العراقي أكثر استقلالاً. السيادة لا تثبتها خلفية صورة، بل قرار مستقل، واقتصاد قوي، ومؤسسات محترمة. والأهم ألا نصنع من قاليباف والحلبوسي أبطالاً أكبر من حجمهما. كلاهما يتحرك داخل منظومة أكبر منه، والقرار الحقيقي غالباً لا يُصنع أمام الكاميرا. لذلك لا يعنيني كثيراً من "انتصر" في معركة العربي والفارسي. يعنيني سؤال أبسط: هل أصبحت حياة الإيراني أفضل؟ وهل أصبح العراق أكثر استقلالاً؟ إذا كانت الإجابة لا، فنحن أمام انتصار في الصورة وهزيمة في الواقع. لقد مللنا أن نعطي الشعوب شعاراً بدل اقتصاد، وصورة بدل مؤسسة، وعدواً جديداً بدل مستقبل جديد. العربي ليس عدوّاً للفارسي، ولا يجب أن يكون الفارسي عدوّاً للعربي. كذلك، السني ليس عدوّاً للشيعي، ولا يجب أن يكون الشيعي عدوّاً للسني. العدو الحقيقي هو كل فكرة تُقنع الإنسان بأن يهدر حاضره كي ينتصر في معركة من الماضي. فالسؤال ليس: هل هو الخليج العربي أم الفارسي؟ السؤال هو: متى يصبح الخليج، أياً كان اسمه، مكاناً يعيش فيه الناس بسلام وحرية وازدهار؟
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 787 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.069%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 529K times each, and 0.149% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 46.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 22% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 25K interactions, about 32x its own typical post.
- What is حسن إسميك's engagement rate on X?
- حسن إسميك (@HasanIsmaik) has an engagement rate of 0.069%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,136,197 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.069%, حسن إسميك sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @HasanIsmaik have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @HasanIsmaik post?
- Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.33 posts per day across the measured window.