Back to @HasanIsmaik's profile

حسن إسميك engagement report

@HasanIsmaik - 1.1M followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.3%
of 1.1M followers
Per impression
0.084%
4.1M views on a typical post
Reach
358.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.4K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.001%
44 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.1/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Friday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 3.4K interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.3%. Posts are seen about 4.1M times each, and 0.084% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 358.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.9K interactions, about 1.7x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.3%, حسن إسميك sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.439%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99158.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,409 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-4%101K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-3%102K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-2%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%237K
Monday0%300K
Tuesday-3%299K
Wednesday-1%256K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%258K
Saturday+3%232K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jun 5, 20261.7x their median

    جوهر الإيمان الحقيقي لا يقتصر على المظاهر الطقسية أو التوجه لجهة معينة، بل يتجلى في التصديق القلبي بالغيبيات وترجمته إلى سلوك عملي. يظهر ذلك في الإحسان للخلق كبذل المال وصلة الأرحام وإغاثة المحتاجين وفك الأسرى، والالتزام بحقوق الله من صلاة وزكاة ووفاء بالعهود وصبر عند الشدائد. من جمع بين صدق العقيدة وإخلاص العمل فهو الصادق المتقي حقاً. جمعة مباركة

    5.2K5507972.9M viewsView on X
  • Apr 12, 2026

    Dear Readers, Donald Trump is not like any other U.S. president. He may appear to some as temperamental, sharp in tone, and quick to anger, but at his core he is a highly intelligent and stubborn figure who knows exactly what he wants and how to achieve it. Behind the apparent chaos he creates lies a precise, calculating mind—one that weighs its steps with a balance of fire and cunning. Moreover, he can read his opponents as if they were open pages in a book. He is neither as the media portrays him nor as his opponents wish him to be. Aside from his bombastic rhetoric, he neither deceives nor is easily deceived. He detects attempts at maneuvering before they begin and rejects without accomodation any delay. This is why Iran has not been fortunate in his return to the White House, as it now faces a man who looks at it with an eye that distinguishes between rhetoric and substance, intentions and tactics. Yet Trump is not bloodthirsty. He opposes wars in principle and believes that limited sacrifice may be the price of saving an entire nation. He understands that if the ruling elite in Iran do not change their approach, their continued rule means the continued suffering of the people. He is also aware that nearly 90 million Iranians live between poverty and the lower middle class, aspiring to rebuild their country much as Germany did after World War II when it transformed itself into a strong and respected nation in which citizens enjoy stability and confidence in the future. From this perspective, Trump focuses on reviving the interests of people rather than regimes, viewing the change of ruling elites—despite its cost—as a gateway to comprehensive progress that benefits millions of Iranians. Iran is but one example among many. Trump does not forget, nor does he leave matters unresolved. He returns to complex files with a sharp focus that allows for calculated opportunities that other leaders missed or dismissed. The Syrian file, for instance, is not far from his attention. Those who believe they have bypassed or deceived Trump on this issue will soon discover they are facing a man who neither forgets nor retreats until he imposes his terms in full. It is also evident that he is steadily moving toward confronting authoritarian regimes, as his logic is rooted in breaking the closed cycles of oppression people suffer from within such systems. Venezuela was first, Iran is now, and perhaps Cuba will follow. At the same time, Trump is loyal and sincere to those who respect him or deal with him in good faith. Behind his harsh language is a practical individual who values work and achievement and seeks to accomplish something meaningful for his country that changes reality for the better. His blunt candor may be seen by some as a flaw, but he considers it a strength, as clarity for him is a virtue, not a shortcoming. For this reason, those who see him as merely an outlier among U.S. presidents do not truly understand him. He has established an approach that will endure as long as America seeks to renew its strength: Make America Great Again. This is not just a slogan, but a doctrine Donald J. Trump initiated—one that will persist and only grow stronger and more influential over time.

    2.9K80516977124K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    بين "الفارسي" و"العربي"... من يملك الخليج فعلاً؟ نشر محمد باقر قاليباف صورته وخلفه "الخليج الفارسي"، فردّ هيبت الحلبوسي بصورة وخلفه "الخليج العربي". مشهد يبدو كأنه معركة هوية: هذا يقول أنا فارسي، وذاك يرد أنا عربي. لكن بينما نتجادل نحن على الاسم، تنظر القوى الكبرى إلى الخليج بلغة مختلفة: النفوذ، والطاقة، والممرات البحرية، والتكنولوجيا، وموازين القوة. نحن نتجادل على الاسم، وغيرنا يتجادل على القوة. لا "الخليج الفارسي" يجعل إيران أكثر ازدهاراً، ولا "الخليج العربي" يجعل القرار العراقي أكثر استقلالاً. السيادة لا تثبتها خلفية صورة، بل قرار مستقل، واقتصاد قوي، ومؤسسات محترمة. والأهم ألا نصنع من قاليباف والحلبوسي أبطالاً أكبر من حجمهما. كلاهما يتحرك داخل منظومة أكبر منه، والقرار الحقيقي غالباً لا يُصنع أمام الكاميرا. لذلك لا يعنيني كثيراً من "انتصر" في معركة العربي والفارسي. يعنيني سؤال أبسط: هل أصبحت حياة الإيراني أفضل؟ وهل أصبح العراق أكثر استقلالاً؟ إذا كانت الإجابة لا، فنحن أمام انتصار في الصورة وهزيمة في الواقع. لقد مللنا أن نعطي الشعوب شعاراً بدل اقتصاد، وصورة بدل مؤسسة، وعدواً جديداً بدل مستقبل جديد. العربي ليس عدوّاً للفارسي، ولا يجب أن يكون الفارسي عدوّاً للعربي. كذلك، السني ليس عدوّاً للشيعي، ولا يجب أن يكون الشيعي عدوّاً للسني. العدو الحقيقي هو كل فكرة تُقنع الإنسان بأن يهدر حاضره كي ينتصر في معركة من الماضي. فالسؤال ليس: هل هو الخليج العربي أم الفارسي؟ السؤال هو: متى يصبح الخليج، أياً كان اسمه، مكاناً يعيش فيه الناس بسلام وحرية وازدهار؟

    3.4K172724.1M viewsView on X
  • May 4, 2026

    الإمارات تُدين بشدة تجدد العدوان الإيراني الغادر باستخدام الصواريخ والطائرات المسيّرة https://t.co/1fAwX6GFuK

    2.0K1.0K1110809K viewsView on X
  • May 27, 2026

    كل عام وأنتم بخير

    1.8K536323.3M viewsView on X
  • May 26, 2026

    ﷽ ﴿الْحَجُّ أَشْهُرٌ مَّعْلُومَاتٌ ۚ فَمَن فَرَضَ فِيهِنَّ الْحَجَّ فَلَا رَفَثَ وَلَا فُسُوقَ وَلَا جِدَالَ فِي الْحَجِّ ۗ وَمَا تَفْعَلُوا مِنْ خَيْرٍ يَعْلَمْهُ اللَّهُ ۗ وَتَزَوَّدُوا فَإِنَّ خَيْرَ الزَّادِ التَّقْوَىٰ ۚ وَاتَّقُونِ يَا أُولِي الْأَلْبَابِ (197) لَيْسَ عَلَيْكُمْ جُنَاحٌ أَن تَبْتَغُوا فَضْلًا مِّن رَّبِّكُمْ ۚ فَإِذَا أَفَضْتُم مِّنْ عَرَفَاتٍ فَاذْكُرُوا اللَّهَ عِندَ الْمَشْعَرِ الْحَرَامِ ۖ وَاذْكُرُوهُ كَمَا هَدَاكُمْ وَإِن كُنتُم مِّن قَبْلِهِ لَمِنَ الضَّالِّينَ (198) ثُمَّ أَفِيضُوا مِنْ حَيْثُ أَفَاضَ النَّاسُ وَاسْتَغْفِرُوا اللَّهَ ۚ إِنَّ اللَّهَ غَفُورٌ رَّحِيمٌ (199)﴾ [البقرة: 197-199]

    1.7K1282011.4M viewsView on X
  • May 5, 2026

    لا يمر المجتمع الشيعي في لبنان اليوم بأزمة سياسية عابرة، بل بلحظة إعادة تعريف عميقة لموقعه داخل الدولة، بعد أن اهتزت المعادلة التي قام عليها نفوذ حزب الله لعقود طويلة: الحماية، والرعاية، واحتكار السردية. اقرأ المقال كاملاً عبر الرابط 👈 https://t.co/tGS9UyCtDC @Annahar https://t.co/BIjyYTEFtJ

    1.5K7810587.4M viewsView on X
  • Jun 15, 2026

    بمناسبة دخول عام هجري جديد، نستحضر ذكرى هجرة النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم من مكة المكرمة، لينشر في العالم النور والسلام، ويبلغ رسالة الله التي دعت العرب إلى التوحيد والعلم والإخلاص، فآلفت فيما بينهم وجمعت صفوفهم وعززت وجودهم كأمة واحدة متماسكة تدفع بمكارم الأخلاق والفضائل الإنسانية. عام هجري مبارك.. وكل عام وأنتم بخير

    1.2K1225052.1M viewsView on X
  • May 9, 2026

    هل نعيش "عصبية رقمية" جديدة؟ يرى ابن خلدون أن العصبية هي سر بناء الدول، لكن في عصر وادي السيليكون، تحولت الخوارزميات إلى أداة لتفتيت المجتمعات لعزلنا في "قبائل رقمية" متنابذة، حيث تآكلت المواطنة لصالح هوية ضيقة يغذيها الحقد والإقصاء. اقرأ المقال كاملاً عبر الرابط 👈 https://t.co/qIj42VG0L9 @aletihadae

    1.2K7710129.5M viewsView on X
  • Apr 27, 2026

    تحويل مضيق هرمز لورقة ضغط سياسي ارتد عكسياً على طهران؛ فالعالم لا يقبل "خصخصة" الممرات الدولية. واليوم تواجه إيران حصاراً قد يكبدها 13 مليار دولار شهرياً، لتعيد تجربة إيطاليا الفاشية التي خُنقت طموحاتها حينما حاولت تحويل المتوسط إلى "بحيرة إيطالية". اقرأ المقال كاملاً عبر الرابط 👈 https://t.co/4Q226f2NFK

    966788462.3M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.4K interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.3%. Posts are seen about 4.1M times each, and 0.084% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 358.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.9K interactions, about 1.7x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is حسن إسميك's engagement rate on X?
حسن إسميك (@HasanIsmaik) has an engagement rate of 0.3%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,140,058 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.3%, حسن إسميك sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @HasanIsmaik have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @HasanIsmaik post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going