Harvard Health engagement report
@HarvardHealth - 2.4M followers on X
Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 74 interactions against 2.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 2 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.385% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.803% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 608 interactions, about 8.2x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tag: #harvardhealth.
Compared with accounts its own size
Harvard Health's engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count. A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.003%, Harvard Health sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.434% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 160.7% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 50K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 60K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 69K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 97K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 97K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 84K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 79K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 230K |
| Monday | 0% | 286K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 276K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 251K |
| Thursday | -1% | 244K |
| Friday | -3% | 252K |
| Saturday | +3% | 227K |
Best tweets
- Jul 27, 20268.2x their median
Here’s some good news if you’re a fast walker — and an incentive to pick up the pace if you’re not: findings from a study published July 14, 2026, in Neurology suggest that older adults who maintain a brisk natural walking pace into their 80s and beyond may be protecting their brains. #HarvardHealth https://t.co/AxLmq4O4B6
- Mar 30, 20265.8x their median
If you're a regular drinker of coffee or tea, you might rely on that morning cup to think more clearly through the day. A new study suggests your daily habit might help your brain in the long term, too. #HarvardHealth https://t.co/C32DYjq3Jm
- Apr 14, 20261.8x their median
Maintaining good bone health, posture, and ergonomics can help. #HarvardHealth https://t.co/BLw98zCFOd
- Aug 11, 2026
Treatment might become more easily accessible, but it isn't right for everyone. #HarvardHealth https://t.co/md00b7aWsC
- May 22, 2026
Offering a variety of benefits, from improved energy levels to better weight management, low-carb foods have become a cornerstone of many healthy eating plans. Here are some practical ways to include low-carb foods in your diet. #HarvardHealth https://t.co/irFcScNPlQ
- Mar 30, 2026
Keeping saturated fat intake low (under 10% of calories) is a cornerstone of dietary advice - but a recent research review suggests it may have less impact for people already at low risk for heart disease. #HarvardHealth https://t.co/UKpL05zjkj
- Jul 24, 2026
Peptides are getting a lot of attention on social media, purporting to support everything from muscle growth and skin health to improved energy, cognitive function, and sleep quality. With all of the buzz, you may be wondering what these compounds are, what benefits they actually offer, and whether they’re safe. https://t.co/Axj6o6HBLe
- Jun 10, 2026
Tofu and other soy-based foods can bring heart-healthy protein and other nutrients to your meals and snacks. #HarvardHealth https://t.co/A7MgUo6ZF1
- Jun 18, 2026
When it comes to this common condition, food really is one of the best medicines. #HarvardHealth https://t.co/uNOhPooa8s
- May 20, 2026
A surprising set of forces can prompt your body to grow older before its time. #HarvardHealth #Aging https://t.co/ckbBXSRifV
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 74 interactions against 2.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 2 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.385% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.803% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 608 interactions, about 8.2x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is Harvard Health's engagement rate on X?
- Harvard Health (@HarvardHealth) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,374,895 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.003%, Harvard Health sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @HarvardHealth have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count, which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @HarvardHealth post?
- Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.07 posts per day across the measured window.