Harmeet K. Dhillon engagement report
@HarmeetKDhillon - 1.4M followers on X
Measured over 67 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 2.9K interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.213%. Measured over 67 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 46K times each, and 6.20% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.43% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 8.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 67 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video, 12% are part of a thread and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 163K interactions, about 57x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ab241, #newprofilepic.
Measured over 67 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #ab241, #newprofilepic.
Compared with accounts its own size
Harmeet K. Dhillon's engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 93% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.213%, Harmeet K. Dhillon sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 85% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 15% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 85% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 186 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 4, 202657x their median
Hello, Twitter. We’re a group of former campaign & Senate staffers for John Fetterman who are disgusted with what he's become. If you were troubled by yesterday's Wall Street Journal story... trust us, that's just the tip of the iceberg. It's even worse than you thought.
- Aug 20, 202646x their median
After 11 years as a sports columnist at the Seattle Times, I have decided to resign. It was entirely my choice, and it was not an easy one. The impetus was the Times declining to run a column I wrote from the perspective of two female student athletes who were opposed to competing against biological males. It was one of several pieces of mine that had been spiked, and I no longer felt like I could properly do my job as a columnist. I lay out the situation in greater detail in the link below, but I want to say that I enjoyed my time with the paper, find the talent there to be immense, and have no animosity toward anyone who works there. It was just time for a change. https://t.co/NAhfUbmaPI
- Aug 20, 202616x their median
Not one but two foreign-born TSA agents I attempted to communicate with at Dulles airport this morning did not have sufficient English language skills to answer questions. A bit disconcerting.
- Oct 7, 202612x their median
UN spokesperson: “An internal investigation has concluded that UNRWA humanitarian workers in Gaza participated in the massacre carried out by Hamas on October 7” https://t.co/ac2ZeYRnVD
- Jul 23, 202512x their median
“When I hear the words or the slogan ‘DEI,’ what I hear is discrimination, exclusion, and intolerance—and that is what we are seeing throughout all of these programs nationally.” https://t.co/l4YqZJCC1A
- Oct 3, 20267.9x their median
Thanks to all friends and family for the well wishes on my recent birthday. There was no play tea set this year, but I felt the ❤️. I saw these old photos and realized I’ve been looking mildly disappointed for over a half century 🤣! https://t.co/i4bKPqDLF4
- Aug 21, 20267.4x their median
It is a crime to knowingly allow noncitizens to vote in federal elections. We have notified all 50 states of these federal election laws, and we @CivilRights Division @theJusticeDept will enforce them! https://t.co/Cwyjw5DYHY
- Aug 26, 20267.0x their median
Hi everyone. My jurisdiction is limited by law and courts. We @CivilRights do as much as we can to expand liberty — within the boundaries set by law and courts. So tagging me on everything that annoys you is fine, but realize my very able team is only going to be able to do something about it if we have jurisdiction, law, and facts on our side, at a minimum! And then, policy priorities and resources. The hazards of being a civil rights lawyer include having to explain this often and letting people down, but we are a nation of laws, not feelings.
- Oct 19, 20266.7x their median
Sending monitors to election polls does not sow distrust in elections—quite the contrary! Tonight on @60Minutes, I explained it is routine for @theJusticeDept to monitor election sites to repair the distrust already present in the system due to voting irregularities. https://t.co/WNAEN31u9j
- Sep 3, 20265.7x their median
Done. Next? https://t.co/k9Rj0ONBaP
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 2.9K interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.213%. Measured over 67 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 46K times each, and 6.20% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.43% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 8.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 67 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video, 12% are part of a thread and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 163K interactions, about 57x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ab241, #newprofilepic.
- What is Harmeet K. Dhillon's engagement rate on X?
- Harmeet K. Dhillon (@HarmeetKDhillon) has an engagement rate of 0.213%, based on the median interactions across 67 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,354,672 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.213%, Harmeet K. Dhillon sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @HarmeetKDhillon have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @HarmeetKDhillon post?
- Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 8.23 posts per day across the measured window.