Harmeet K. Dhillon engagement report
@HarmeetKDhillon - 1.4M followers on X
Measured over 52 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 2.9K interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.215%. Measured over 52 original posts, its engagement rate beats 84% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 57K times each, and 5.13% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.19% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 52 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 133K interactions, about 46x its own typical post.
Measured over 52 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Harmeet K. Dhillon's engagement rate beats 84% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 92% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.215%, Harmeet K. Dhillon sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.433%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.433% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 160.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 51K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 61K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 70K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 97K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 101K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 98K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 91K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 85K |
| 19:00 UTC | -1% | 80K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -1% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 231K |
| Monday | 0% | 288K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 278K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 251K |
| Thursday | -1% | 245K |
| Friday | -3% | 253K |
| Saturday | +3% | 227K |
Best tweets
- Aug 20, 202646x their median
After 11 years as a sports columnist at the Seattle Times, I have decided to resign. It was entirely my choice, and it was not an easy one. The impetus was the Times declining to run a column I wrote from the perspective of two female student athletes who were opposed to competing against biological males. It was one of several pieces of mine that had been spiked, and I no longer felt like I could properly do my job as a columnist. I lay out the situation in greater detail in the link below, but I want to say that I enjoyed my time with the paper, find the talent there to be immense, and have no animosity toward anyone who works there. It was just time for a change. https://t.co/NAhfUbmaPI
- Aug 20, 202616x their median
Not one but two foreign-born TSA agents I attempted to communicate with at Dulles airport this morning did not have sufficient English language skills to answer questions. A bit disconcerting.
- Jul 23, 202512x their median
“When I hear the words or the slogan ‘DEI,’ what I hear is discrimination, exclusion, and intolerance—and that is what we are seeing throughout all of these programs nationally.” https://t.co/l4YqZJCC1A
- Aug 21, 20267.4x their median
It is a crime to knowingly allow noncitizens to vote in federal elections. We have notified all 50 states of these federal election laws, and we @CivilRights Division @theJusticeDept will enforce them! https://t.co/Cwyjw5DYHY
- Aug 26, 20266.9x their median
Hi everyone. My jurisdiction is limited by law and courts. We @CivilRights do as much as we can to expand liberty — within the boundaries set by law and courts. So tagging me on everything that annoys you is fine, but realize my very able team is only going to be able to do something about it if we have jurisdiction, law, and facts on our side, at a minimum! And then, policy priorities and resources. The hazards of being a civil rights lawyer include having to explain this often and letting people down, but we are a nation of laws, not feelings.
- Aug 20, 20265.0x their median
In the past, the @CivilRights Division was going after states requiring voter ID and enforcing election laws. No more! Under this @theJusticeDept, it is unacceptable for noncitizens to cancel the votes of citizens, whether 1 vote or 1000! https://t.co/5aHclLDqdC
- Aug 23, 20264.6x their median
Was tending my garden this evening after visiting my mom for two evenings…. Several neighbors stopped by & expressed their appreciation for my garden and its blooms 🥰. The passion flowers are particularly popular! Politics aside, some people still love nature& beauty! https://t.co/ZZRycrxSVO
- Aug 30, 20263.4x their median
This one also needs to be finished. I’m thinking sleeveless on this one? Designer has it both ways. https://t.co/0OMmMJBiC2
- Aug 20, 20263.3x their median
I’ve reached a stage of life/maturity wherein I’d rather spend an hour in the gym than 90% of the DC “social” functions on rotation. I pushed heavy weights, and I didn’t have to learn any new acronyms! Thank you! 😊
- Aug 26, 20263.2x their median
Cooked some healthy carbs to go with my previously grilled chicken. Also hit the gym, lifted heavier, walked 20k steps, initiated investigations, approved indictments, mentored youths, prepped an oral argument, got a friend’s wedding invite …. A good day! https://t.co/lMjKk0Wcxf
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 2.9K interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.215%. Measured over 52 original posts, its engagement rate beats 84% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 57K times each, and 5.13% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.19% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 52 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 133K interactions, about 46x its own typical post.
- What is Harmeet K. Dhillon's engagement rate on X?
- Harmeet K. Dhillon (@HarmeetKDhillon) has an engagement rate of 0.215%, based on the median interactions across 52 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,352,650 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.215%, Harmeet K. Dhillon sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @HarmeetKDhillon have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 84% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @HarmeetKDhillon post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 6.47 posts per day across the measured window.