Back to @HardwareUnboxed's profile

Hardware Unboxed engagement report

@HardwareUnboxed - 774K followers on X

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.066%
of 774K followers
Per impression
1.59%
31K views on a typical post
Reach
4.11%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
501
interactions (median)
Saved
0.076%
24 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.3/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Monday

Early reading. We have captured 3 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 501 interactions against 774K followers, an engagement rate of 0.066%. Posts are seen about 31K times each, and 1.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video, 67% are part of a thread and 67% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.9K interactions, about 3.8x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.066%, Hardware Unboxed sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,146 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.694%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,146 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,455 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.694%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video33% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link67% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 33% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 67% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 301 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 26, 20263.8x their median

    All this talk about personal computing dying and what not, I (Steve) decided to try GeForceNOW (Australia) Ultimate using Wireless NBN, Starlink and 5G. My review is this: It's really bad, f@&ing sucks. Thank you for your time.

    1.8K80701177K viewsView on X
  • Apr 2, 20263.2x their median

    We’re not interested in the Threat Interactive drama, he can do his thing and we will continue to do ours, which means testing GPU features like DLSS, FSR and XeSS. If he wants to spend his time and energy pushing for better quality games we’re here for it. But needlessly attacking others because he disagrees on which features should be tested is painfully obnoxious. In a way it reminds me of the VRAM issue and how the community viewed our coverage versus Digital Foundry. We were pushing for better consumer products with more VRAM, they were pushing developers to optimize the games, we were not at odds with one another, they were pushing for better software and we were pushing for better hardware. Whether you believe upscaling technology should exist or not is irrelevant, your opinion is not the only one. Some people believe mainstream 8GB GPUs are fine and should exist, we don’t agree, but you’re more than welcome to make that content and share that opinion, and some have. If Threat Interactive was taking the fight to AMD and Nvidia, we’d really have no issue with that, but attacking others in the space because you don’t like that they test a feature doesn’t achieve anything, it’s purely drama. Anyway, that's involved as we’re getting in it, he can continue to proceed however he likes, just know we’re out.

    1.8K50843107K viewsView on X
  • May 26, 20263.5x their median

    NVIDIA Control Panel is officially retiring after 20 years for GeForce users https://t.co/ZLwptkTUhn https://t.co/Dwcs8xohRN

    1.5K1287064349K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20263.0x their median

    I've had a sneak peek at updated graphics card price lists. Shortly you will see the RTX 5060 Ti 16GB price match the 9070 XT. 9070 XT vs 5060 Ti 16GB head to head anyone? You would think given current pricing AMD could recover some market share :D https://t.co/FWJa4n031n

    1.3K6511221225K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 20262.7x their median

    So the Steam Machine is meant to be easier to live with than a traditional gaming PC, but already needs a BIOS update to avoid thermal throttling. It uses a Radeon GPU, what were they expecting?

    1.2K31827103K viewsView on X
  • May 15, 20262.6x their median

    Seeing a few excuses in the comments claiming it's fine AMD took over 1 year to bring FSR 4 to RDNA 3 because development takes time blah blah blah we don't know what we're taking about blah blah We knew for a fact that FSR4 INT8 offered a better experience than FSR 3.1 for RDNA3 in October 2025! We tested it and proved it. They could have and should have released the feature back then. So yes the amount of time it's taken is unacceptable

    1.2K5677362K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20261.9x their median

    You don't say... https://t.co/LK37HBkgTK

    9232923152K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 2026

    5 years ago I wrote this when concluding my RTX 3060 review, I can't imagine what I'd say for a 2026 re-review at the same $330 US MSRP :D We're so cooked! https://t.co/MP5QZmINVV

    5902931039K viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 2026

    ROFL maybe the Steam Machine price isn't that bad after all. https://t.co/k845yHjj1t

    5171633234K viewsView on X
  • Mar 27, 2026

    You never see this BTW (Radeon beating GeForce). The closer the item is ranked to the top spot, the more it has sold. First spot could outsell second spot by a factor of two times for example (that GPU stand is a hot item). The fact that the best selling 5070 Ti model is in 12th position says it all. People are not buying the 5070 Ti. So when local retailers tell us they are selling 80%+ more 9070 XT's when compared to 5070 Ti's, they aren't lying.

    5041836595K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 501 interactions against 774K followers, an engagement rate of 0.066%. Posts are seen about 31K times each, and 1.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video, 67% are part of a thread and 67% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.9K interactions, about 3.8x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Hardware Unboxed's engagement rate on X?
Hardware Unboxed (@HardwareUnboxed) has an engagement rate of 0.066%, based on the median interactions across 3 original posts from the last 30 days against 774,148 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.066%, Hardware Unboxed sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,146 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @HardwareUnboxed have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @HardwareUnboxed post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going