Back to @Hakeemfederer's profile

فيديريستا engagement report

@Hakeemfederer - 82K followers on X

Measured over 43 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.179%
of 82K followers
Per impression
1.83%
8.0K views on a typical post
Reach
9.79%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
147
interactions (median)
Saved
0.05%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.73/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 147 interactions against 82K followers, an engagement rate of 0.179%. Measured over 43 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.0K times each, and 1.83% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 43 posts sampled, 28% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 103x its own typical post.

Measured over 43 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

فيديريستا's engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 59% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.179%, فيديريستا sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video28% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link2% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 28% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 125 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 4, 2026103x their median

    K Ass I for Real Madrid: 0 Goals 0 Assists 4 Matches CONSISTENCY. 🔥🔥🔥 https://t.co/wDCZgtfNKO

    14K946151122189K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202697x their median

    Bartra tiene el cuerpo volcado sobre su área, pero en el momento del golpeo de Mbappé aún no ha pisado el césped con su pie derecho (el izquierdo está por detrás de la línea). La acción está bien arbitrada. https://t.co/JWdUOTLC5W

    12K975841226634K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202677x their median

    Ballon D’or vs Real Madrid 1 of 1. 🏆 https://t.co/I6ReXcmGMe

    10K1.0K8794125K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202640x their median

    كنت حاس ان هالإنسان سطحي بس ما عندي دليل، الحين تأكدت: https://t.co/U9Q7KOM4PI

    4.5K1235067236.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202636x their median

    Araujo vient de sortir un match de PATRON. Liverpool doit lever la clause dès ce soir. Merci Barça. ❤️ https://t.co/pifXZwqK8D

    4.5K350231195179K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202611x their median

    🚨🚨🚨 فرناندو بولو: فليك قرر ابقاء ترتيب القادة بشكل دائم 1️⃣ رافينها الأول 2️⃣ بيدري الثاني https://t.co/ZUdulFUFZe

    1.3K451413878K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20268.7x their median

    فرناندو بولو (MD): أوهانا ستمنح برشلونة قرابة 30 مليون يورو في أول ثلاث سنوات، مقابل مشروع عقاري ضخم في دبي وظهور اسمها خلف القميص محليًا، ضمن اتفاق يمتد لأكثر من 25 عامًا https://t.co/1bIrZl4aWJ

    1.2K28186181K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20268.7x their median

    Lionel Messi - World Cup 2026 The Last Dance https://t.co/U6C3Jev1qO

    1.1K18531752K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20264.2x their median

    إبراهيم فايق: تريزيجيه كان ماضي 5 سنين مع الأهلي وكان فاضل فيهم 4 سنين بـ 9 مليون دولار علي الـ 4 سنين ، وانا لاعب ضامن الـ 4 سنين والـ 9 مليون دولار كمان ، الناس لما قعدت معاه وقالت له يا تريزيجيه الوضع كذا كذا ، قالهم انا عمري ما هكون جزء من المشكله في الأهلي وشوفوا انتوا عايزين ايه وبرحتكم وانا لازم اكون جزء من حل المشكله في الأهلي ، الراجل معملش زي الاجانب ولا الغريب وقالهم ادوني بقيت عقدي وانا همشي ، لا قالهم عادي خالص نفض العقود والفلوس كلها هتنازل عليها عشان خاطر الأهلي ، الراجل احترم الأهلي وفعلا تنازل عن كل فلوسة للنادي ، تريزيجيه رجع للنادي الأهلي نص الفلوس اللي خدها الموسم السابق وده كلام علي مسئوليتي الشخصيه ❤

    5703251432K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20264.2x their median

    هل مبابي اهم تعاقد عمله برشلونة فى الالفية ولا صفقة رونالدينهو؟

    5603115513K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 147 interactions against 82K followers, an engagement rate of 0.179%. Measured over 43 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.0K times each, and 1.83% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 43 posts sampled, 28% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 103x its own typical post.

What is فيديريستا's engagement rate on X?
فيديريستا (@Hakeemfederer) has an engagement rate of 0.179%, based on the median interactions across 43 original posts from the last 30 days against 82,262 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.179%, فيديريستا sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Hakeemfederer have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Hakeemfederer post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going