Back to @HackingDave's profile

Dave Kennedy engagement report

@HackingDave - 234K followers on X

Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.045%
of 234K followers
Per impression
1.31%
8.0K views on a typical post
Reach
3.45%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
106
interactions (median)
Saved
0.012%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.6/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 106 interactions against 234K followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.0K times each, and 1.31% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 288x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #grrcon, #securitynoise, #webinar.

Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026. Recurring tags: #grrcon, #securitynoise, #webinar.

Compared with accounts its own size

Dave Kennedy's engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.045%, Dave Kennedy sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9982.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,567 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,364 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video60% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link7% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 60% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 214 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 8, 2026288x their median

    It’s official! The live-action film of The Legend of Zelda, currently in production, will be titled The Legend of Zelda. The film is planned to be released in theatres worldwide on April 30, 2027. #TheLegendofZeldaMovie #NintendoDirect https://t.co/z1sH9DXzkK

    26K4.0K334568832K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026265x their median

    This is one of the funniest things I’ve seen in a long time. Perfect use of free will. https://t.co/vhGMbKQ0Nl

    25K2.0K3412341.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2026126x their median

    It feels like OpenAI has nerfed GPT Astra. just look at this difference. the left one was built at launch of GPT Astra and the right one was built right now. https://t.co/kOiftSKwrX

    12K4375232362.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 202622x their median

    ANTHROPIC FILES FOR IPO, PROSPECTUS SEEN BY REUTERS Here’s everything you need to know: Anthropic could seek a valuation above $2 trillion. 2025 financials: Rev: $4.59B, up 1,088% YoY from $386M Oper loss: $8.06B, widening from $2.98B GAAP net loss: $41.97B, vs $8.31B in 2024 That headline $42B net loss needs some context. Roughly $34B came from an accounting charge tied largely to the rising value of financing instruments that could eventually convert into Anthropic shares, rather than cash spent running the business. Even excluding that, the underlying operating losses remain substantial. Anthropic spent $7.33B on compute and infrastructure in 2025, up 190% YoY and nearly 3x the prior year. That alone represented: • 58% of its $12.65B in total operating expenses • Roughly 1.6x its entire annual revenue And the spending is expected to keep climbing. The prospectus outlines roughly $518B in cloud, compute and infrastructure obligations as Anthropic continues building out its AI systems. Anthropic ended 2025 with $20.28B in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. Its two largest direct customers each accounted for 12% of revenue, meaning just two customers represented 24% of total 2025 sales. Anthropic also warned that many of its largest customers are not locked into long-term contracts and could reduce or stop spending. At the same time, the filing highlights risks around increasingly autonomous AI systems, including unexpected behavior, security concerns and potential misuse. Anthropic is competing in an increasingly expensive AI race with OpenAI, Google, Meta and xAI. Amazon and Google are also major strategic partners and investors in Anthropic, while supplying much of the cloud infrastructure needed to train and run Claude. The IPO could come after the November U.S. midterm elections and would give public-market investors one of their first pure-play ways to value a frontier AI lab. Source: Reuters

    1.8K2351542111.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20264.1x their median

    I'm seeing a lot on anti-AI folks coming out that we should not "allow" AI into cybersecurity. We aren't the gatekeepers. Businesses, boards, CEO's - it's their businesses not ours - we need to figure out a way to get our hands around it to try and to it in a way that helps organizations not shoot themselves in the foot while doing it. We need to be leading the charge on AI research, safety, governance, adoption, and more. You can be Anti-AI and hate the system, but the system isn't decided by us - we go where the system goes, even if we disagree or agree with it. It's irrelevant.

    3393360417K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262.6x their median

    We're officially at Hell's Front Porch in Ohio. 😂🌡 https://t.co/yEwfp0lOZH

    22728111017K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262.6x their median

    About to go on the news.... massive storm ripping through, right before I go on, power kicks out. I am so prepared for this. Everything on backup UPS and generator kicked right on. Didn't miss a beat. I'm a professionallll

    249320111K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20262.2x their median

    Picking my son up for college to drive him to a basketball tournament - all of his friends were outside and yelled “Yoooo it’s HackingDave” 😂😂😂😂

    21821709.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20262.0x their median

    Haven't watched the apple event, but let me guess - better camera, new colors, faster processor, and maybe better battery life? #Innovation

    152450219K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20261.8x their median

    Hanging out with my oldest boy. Don’t get to see him much anymore loving it https://t.co/3SebAkCD3b

    1833908.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#grrcon#securitynoise#webinar#wehackhealth#ai

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 106 interactions against 234K followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.0K times each, and 1.31% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 288x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #grrcon, #securitynoise, #webinar.

What is Dave Kennedy's engagement rate on X?
Dave Kennedy (@HackingDave) has an engagement rate of 0.045%, based on the median interactions across 42 original posts from the last 30 days against 234,027 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.045%, Dave Kennedy sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @HackingDave have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @HackingDave post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going