Harry Potter Universe engagement report
@HPotterUniverse - 460K followers on X
Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 4 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 610 interactions against 460K followers, an engagement rate of 0.132%. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 2.24% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.91% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.5K interactions, about 9.1x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.132%, Harry Potter Universe sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 25% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 25% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 259 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 31, 20269.1x their median
Happy Birthday, J.K. Rowling! https://t.co/TUW0ptPOYy
- May 2, 20265.1x their median
Nobody could have played Snape better than Alan Rickman. https://t.co/RDfVMAY9Pf
- Aug 31, 20264.6x their median
Thank you for everything, Lionel Messi. 🐐 https://t.co/hzGcicjO3E
- Apr 26, 20263.9x their median
This had to have happened at least once or twice 🤣 https://t.co/4t94RiD3hz
- Sep 9, 20253.2x their median
Stuart Craig, the Production Designer on all of the Harry Potter films, has sadly passed away at the age of 83. He is responsible for the design and creation of all of the wonderful sets that we see throughout the films such as Hogwarts, Hogsmeade, Diagon Alley, the Ministry of Magic, the common rooms, the Great Hall, the Burrow, the Room of Requirement, Malfoy Manor, and so on. Every single set that you see in the films - that was Stuart Craig who designed them. He also was the Production Designer on all of the Fantastic Beasts films, and designed all of Universal’s Wizarding World of Harry Potter theme parks. He cannot be thanked enough for bringing the world of Harry Potter to life on screen, and his work will live on forever. RIP. 🕊️
- Jun 3, 20261.7x their median
Iconic. 🦁🐍 https://t.co/woQzNWLcl4
- Sep 2, 2026
This was very strange to watch. I am so attached to the actors from the films that seeing other actors play those same characters is extremely weird. Hagrid doesn’t feel like Hagrid because someone other than Robbie Coltrane is playing him now. Same with McGonagall, Snape, Dumbledore, Harry, Ron, Hermione, the Weasley twins, all of them. I do not mean to be disrespectful, but they feel like imposters. That’s just my attachment to the actors who played these characters in the films. And we will always have the films, thankfully. The new generation of Harry Potter fans can watch and enjoy the TV show. https://t.co/2P22nKEc6E
- Jun 12, 2026
16 years ago today, filming for Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows came to an end. It concluded a decade of filming, and it marked an unprecedented era of success. Hard to believe that it has been 16 years already… https://t.co/hcqV5NOwzv
- Apr 25, 2026
Saturday’s are for Harry Potter marathons 🎥🍿🍻⚡️ https://t.co/54fureZLMI
- May 20, 2026
🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/wI8fGeYRAy
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 610 interactions against 460K followers, an engagement rate of 0.132%. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 2.24% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.91% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.5K interactions, about 9.1x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is Harry Potter Universe's engagement rate on X?
- Harry Potter Universe (@HPotterUniverse) has an engagement rate of 0.132%, based on the median interactions across 4 original posts from the last 30 days against 460,378 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.132%, Harry Potter Universe sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @HPotterUniverse have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @HPotterUniverse post?
- Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.2 posts per day across the measured window.