Back to @HPotterUniverse's profile

Harry Potter Universe engagement report

@HPotterUniverse - 460K followers on X

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.132%
of 460K followers
Per impression
2.24%
27K views on a typical post
Reach
5.90%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
610
interactions (median)
Saved
0.101%
28 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.2/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Monday

Early reading. We have captured 4 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 610 interactions against 460K followers, an engagement rate of 0.132%. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 2.24% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.91% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.5K interactions, about 9.1x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.132%, Harry Potter Universe sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link25% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 25% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 259 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 31, 20269.1x their median

    Happy Birthday, J.K. Rowling! https://t.co/TUW0ptPOYy

    5.3K20228573K viewsView on X
  • May 2, 20265.1x their median

    Nobody could have played Snape better than Alan Rickman. https://t.co/RDfVMAY9Pf

    2.7K390412266K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20264.6x their median

    Thank you for everything, Lionel Messi. 🐐 https://t.co/hzGcicjO3E

    2.5K22111119K viewsView on X
  • Apr 26, 20263.9x their median

    This had to have happened at least once or twice 🤣 https://t.co/4t94RiD3hz

    2.2K1555541K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20253.2x their median

    Stuart Craig, the Production Designer on all of the Harry Potter films, has sadly passed away at the age of 83. He is responsible for the design and creation of all of the wonderful sets that we see throughout the films such as Hogwarts, Hogsmeade, Diagon Alley, the Ministry of Magic, the common rooms, the Great Hall, the Burrow, the Room of Requirement, Malfoy Manor, and so on. Every single set that you see in the films - that was Stuart Craig who designed them. He also was the Production Designer on all of the Fantastic Beasts films, and designed all of Universal’s Wizarding World of Harry Potter theme parks. He cannot be thanked enough for bringing the world of Harry Potter to life on screen, and his work will live on forever. RIP. 🕊️

    1.6K2423530132K viewsView on X
  • Jun 3, 20261.7x their median

    Iconic. 🦁🐍 https://t.co/woQzNWLcl4

    9289411219K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026

    This was very strange to watch. I am so attached to the actors from the films that seeing other actors play those same characters is extremely weird. Hagrid doesn’t feel like Hagrid because someone other than Robbie Coltrane is playing him now. Same with McGonagall, Snape, Dumbledore, Harry, Ron, Hermione, the Weasley twins, all of them. I do not mean to be disrespectful, but they feel like imposters. That’s just my attachment to the actors who played these characters in the films. And we will always have the films, thankfully. The new generation of Harry Potter fans can watch and enjoy the TV show. https://t.co/2P22nKEc6E

    63053951641K viewsView on X
  • Jun 12, 2026

    16 years ago today, filming for Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows came to an end. It concluded a decade of filming, and it marked an unprecedented era of success. Hard to believe that it has been 16 years already… https://t.co/hcqV5NOwzv

    6471026517K viewsView on X
  • Apr 25, 2026

    Saturday’s are for Harry Potter marathons 🎥🍿🍻⚡️ https://t.co/54fureZLMI

    650875821K viewsView on X
  • May 20, 2026

    🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/wI8fGeYRAy

    673561212K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 610 interactions against 460K followers, an engagement rate of 0.132%. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 2.24% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.91% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.5K interactions, about 9.1x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Harry Potter Universe's engagement rate on X?
Harry Potter Universe (@HPotterUniverse) has an engagement rate of 0.132%, based on the median interactions across 4 original posts from the last 30 days against 460,378 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.132%, Harry Potter Universe sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @HPotterUniverse have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @HPotterUniverse post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going