Back to @HP's profile

HP engagement report

@HP - 1.1M followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.004%
of 1.1M followers
Per impression
0.609%
6.9K views on a typical post
Reach
0.63%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
42
interactions (median)
Saved
0.029%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.27/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 42 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 6.9K times each, and 0.609% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.634% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 63% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.9K interactions, about 58x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

HP's engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 35% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.004%, HP sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video88% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link63% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 63% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 382 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Mar 15, 202658x their median

    Congratulations to @LewisHamilton and @ScuderiaFerrari HP on a strong P3 finish in Shanghai — his first Grand Prix podium with the team, and a result that reflects growth, trust, and execution at the highest level. https://t.co/JXw4Cmy3sh

    4.5K37342644K viewsView on X
  • Jun 14, 202666x their median

    Congratulations to @LewisHamilton and the entire @ScuderiaFerrari HP team on a historic Grand Prix victory. A milestone moment, and a testament to the focus, teamwork, and pursuit of excellence behind every lap. https://t.co/AEN8UwUSz5

    2.5K21924421K viewsView on X
  • Jun 1, 202625x their median

    NVIDIA RTX Spark reinvents @Windows PCs for the era of personal AI agents, offering a new class of computer that moves from tool to teammate. https://t.co/I1mOknCU9K

    1.8K22564672.2M viewsView on X
  • Jun 4, 202621x their median

    HP and @Ferrari are bringing performance, precision and design heritage together in a new way. Introduced ahead of the Monaco Grand Prix, the HP Limited Edition Scuderia Ferrari AI PC reflects nearly two years of collaboration between Ferrari’s Design Studio and HP’s industrial designers and engineers. The result is a device shaped by craftsmanship, technical precision and the shared pursuit of excellence. Only 4,999 units will be available, a nod to Ferrari’s philosophy of selling one less than the market demands. More than a PC, this is a true collector’s item built for those who value power, exclusivity and design without compromise. https://t.co/6ASCEPs38A

    701855552599K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20269.7x their median

    From your first task to your last, the new HP Googlebook 14 is designed to keep your momentum going. Designed for Gemini Intelligence and powered by Snapdragon® X Elite, it combines fast, responsive performance, an ultra-thin design, and up to 19 hours of battery life so it's ready wherever work happens. Preorder yours https://t.co/rUbLTkpUOs

    2934265734K viewsView on X
  • Jan 9, 20265.5x their median

    Ready to redefine your workspace? ✨ The future of work isn’t just coming—it’s here. Meet HP EliteBoard G1a, the world’s first full AI PC built right into a keyboard. With one USB‑C cable, transform any display into a powerful, streamlined hub for productivity. No clutter. No compromise. Just maximized minimalism for the modern enterprise. Work smarter. Move faster. Lead the future. https://t.co/dTnh3Jglwy

    25237191145K viewsView on X
  • Jan 7, 20263.5x their median

    🚀 The Future of Work Starts Here. This year at CES 2026, we introduced the HP EliteBoard G1a — the world’s first AI PC built into a keyboard. Ultra-thin. Ultra-mobile. Powered by next-gen AI performance, it transforms any display into a powerhouse workspace. Pair it with the HP Series 7 Pro 4K Monitor, featuring Neo:LED brilliance and Thunderbolt™ 4 for seamless, single-cable connectivity. Sleek. Secure. Unstoppable. This is more than innovation — it’s a new way to work.

    15234302029K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20265.5x their median

    We’re joining @nvidia in supporting NVIDIA Open Agent Safety Platform, an open approach to setting safer boundaries for AI agents. This commitment builds on HP’s longstanding collaboration with NVIDIA and reflects HP’s broader approach to help customers unlock the value of AI with the security and control needed to adopt and scale it with confidence. 📰 Learn More on the HP Newsroom https://t.co/Bpc0dpWvHr

    507172419K viewsView on X
  • Jan 29, 20263.9x their median

    The future of work is lighter, smarter, and faster—HP EliteBoard G1a, the world’s first full AI PC built into a keyboard, turns any USB‑C display into your streamlined workspace with one cable. Maximized minimalism starts here. https://t.co/9qIxzU4pgt https://t.co/O3mhRjwMwO

    715558211K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20263.8x their median

    HP technology helps reduce complexity across @ScuderiaFerrari workflows, unifying computing, printing and collaboration tools into one seamless ecosystem. The results: more time to focus on higher-value work and technology that empowers rather than interrupts. When every detail counts, the right tools can turn in a competitive advantage. https://t.co/l3t2CdWgBz

    323589331K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 42 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 6.9K times each, and 0.609% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.634% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 63% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.9K interactions, about 58x its own typical post.

What is HP's engagement rate on X?
HP (@HP) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,087,025 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.004%, HP sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @HP have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @HP post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going