Back to @HLTCO's profile

HLTCO engagement report

@HLTCO - 215K followers on X

Measured over 61 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.584%
of 215K followers
Per impression
0.548%
229K views on a typical post
Reach
106.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.014%
33 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.37/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 215K followers, an engagement rate of 0.584%. Measured over 61 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 229K times each, and 0.548% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 106.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 61 posts sampled, 51% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 60K interactions, about 47x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #mancity, #bbcfootball, #cafc.

Measured over 61 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026. Recurring tags: #mancity, #bbcfootball, #cafc.

Compared with accounts its own size

HLTCO's engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 28% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.584%, HLTCO sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video51% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link18% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 51% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 18% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 210 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 30, 202647x their median

    Etihad threatening to sue. UAE reportedly intimating that UK investment could be pulled. A Prime Minister couching any criticisism. If this sorry saga doesn't convince you that state ownership of football clubs should never be allowed, nothing ever will.

    51K7.7K3442542.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202646x their median

    Daughter randomly asked me if she could film the end of the match 😅 https://t.co/OaublCBVMT

    55K1.9K220984.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202629x their median

    When I wrote about this image rights sham for The Independent in 2018, Manchester City threatened to sue us and demanded I tweet out a personal apology on here. We fought them. They did not sue us. City's sham is confirmed by the Premier League today https://t.co/Fzemh3f8CA

    30K5.6K2201421.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 202629x their median

    Crystal Palace sold Marc Guéhi, their club captian to ManCity for £20m then turned around and sold Lacroix to Chelsea for £52m #observing

    32K3.1K3191561.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202615x their median

    Today is World Suicide Prevention Day. With that in mind, I wanted to remind you of this video produced by Norwich City; it remains one of the most profound things I've ever seen produced on the subject. https://t.co/vsQJtXKBZQ

    14K4.1K154256709K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202614x their median

    Absolute cinema on Four in a Bed. https://t.co/5W2MCs4GhZ

    17K7181191322.9M viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202610x their median

    Nah Jamie LOOOOOOOOOL He’s a good sport about it at least! Haven’t we all indeed! @CBSSportsGolazo https://t.co/uL8ItpO8lg

    12K48033802.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20269.4x their median

    Whoever names the most obscure Premier League striker wins

    6.8K994.4K5653.0M viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20268.8x their median

    Ross Kemp every 5 minutes… #CelebrityTraitors https://t.co/hw9EW4bmfM

    10K61753301.1M viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20266.1x their median

    🚨🇫🇷 MICHAEL OLISE OPENS THE SCORING FOR FRANCE! WHAT A FANTASTIC FREE KICK! 🤯 France 1-0 Italy. https://t.co/j5dycOrmJB

    6.8K61847239295K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#mancity#bbcfootball#cafc#celebritytraitors#nationsleague

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 215K followers, an engagement rate of 0.584%. Measured over 61 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 229K times each, and 0.548% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 106.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 61 posts sampled, 51% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 60K interactions, about 47x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #mancity, #bbcfootball, #cafc.

What is HLTCO's engagement rate on X?
HLTCO (@HLTCO) has an engagement rate of 0.584%, based on the median interactions across 61 original posts from the last 30 days against 215,164 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.584%, HLTCO sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @HLTCO have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @HLTCO post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going