Back to @HKane's profile

Harry Kane engagement report

@HKane - 4.2M followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.286%
of 4.2M followers
Per impression
8.23%
148K views on a typical post
Reach
3.48%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
12K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.039%
58 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.33/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 12K interactions against 4.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.286%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 148K times each, and 8.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.48% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 228K interactions, about 19x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026. Recurring tag: #ballondor.

Compared with accounts its own size

Harry Kane's engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 97% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.286%, Harry Kane sits above the 50th percentile of the 155,411 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.127% to 0.603%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.603%
p902.31%
p9983.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 155,411 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,126 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.603%
90th percentile2.31%
99th percentile83.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 159 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 6, 202619x their median

    Wow. Just wow. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 https://t.co/UqPWin5E0Z

    214K10K3.2K4092.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 202618x their median

    Voice is back! 😂 Reflecting on an incredible night in Mexico… 🦁🦁🦁 https://t.co/YdCQo1XGoB

    210K11K2.2K7465.6M viewsView on X
  • Jul 1, 202614x their median

    This is what it means. Got the job done. See you in Mexico. 🦁🦁🦁 https://t.co/GRBSaF8hBL

    154K9.0K2.9K5372.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 202612x their median

    No words are big enough right now to overcome this empty feeling in the stomach. We were close, really close to another final but it wasn’t enough. We’ve given everything over these last 7 weeks and to fall short is hard to take! I know the expectations are high and rightly so, we’ve been knocking on the door for 8 years now but again are missing that final piece of the jigsaw! That’s where we have to go away, process it and find a way to get better. I’m so proud of the boys and what we have shown throughout this tournament - some tough games and tough environments that we have overcome. Some memories that will stay with us players and I’m sure you fans for a long long time! Going for glory doesn’t always mean you will get it. You have to fight for it, get knocked down, pick yourself up and go again and that’s what we will do, there’s no other way but to keep believing and keeping pushing. Thank you to every single fan that travelled and showed their support in the stadiums. Thank you to every fan back home for believing in us. Thank you to the boys and staff for everything you have given. As always Win or lose, we learn and go again! 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🦁

    135K8.7K7.1K9373.5M viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 202610x their median

    It doesn’t get much better than that! Guts and courage from every single member of this squad. Proud of this team! ❤️🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 https://t.co/gH5kLEy7KA

    115K7.1K1.5K2001.2M viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 20269.5x their median

    Ready to give it our all. 🦁🦁🦁 https://t.co/Ypjk9yHC62

    105K5.3K3.9K1.4K2.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 1, 20268.4x their median

    😘🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 https://t.co/j4oW9y5095

    97K4.6K1.2K2301.5M viewsView on X
  • May 23, 20266.6x their median

    Match ball 🤝 Winners medal 🏅⚽️ https://t.co/Kza9IJv6lo

    95K4.7K1.1K2011.1M viewsView on X
  • Jun 17, 20268.4x their median

    Off to a winning start. Second half set the standard for us, credit to all the boys for a huge shift. Thank you for your support 🙌🦁🦁🦁 https://t.co/zCBmogjk1Z

    90K4.5K1.5K2521.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 20267.6x their median

    Let's keep believing. Onto the semis. 🙌🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 https://t.co/MSwCZDdUnI

    86K4.6K1.3K171922K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ballondor

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 12K interactions against 4.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.286%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 148K times each, and 8.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.48% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 228K interactions, about 19x its own typical post.

What is Harry Kane's engagement rate on X?
Harry Kane (@HKane) has an engagement rate of 0.286%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 4,245,186 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.286%, Harry Kane sits above the 50th percentile of the 155,411 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @HKane have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @HKane post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going