Back to @HATzortzis's profile

Hamza A. Tzortzis engagement report

@HATzortzis - 252K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.062%
of 252K followers
Per impression
1.77%
8.9K views on a typical post
Reach
3.52%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
157
interactions (median)
Saved
0.248%
22 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 157 interactions against 252K followers, an engagement rate of 0.062%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.9K times each, and 1.77% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.52% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 70% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 6.9x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Hamza A. Tzortzis's engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 63% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.062%, Hamza A. Tzortzis sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link70% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 70% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 357 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 27, 20266.9x their median

    Alhamdulillah, all praise and gratitude belongs to God. https://t.co/wqvIUZpGCE

    9917715423K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20263.8x their median

    "Hamza, you are not that active online!" Yes, because we have other important work to do. Our vision is to see a world convinced of Islam, and we aim to achieve this by supporting and developing individuals and organisations to share and defend Islam academically and intellectually. Our goal is to create thousands of intellectual ambassadors. Become one. Register for our academy: https://t.co/LcHUkEFWq7. @SapienceOrg

    5205715726K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20262.8x their median

    It takes a toddler five minutes to defecate on one's living room carpet, but it takes at least fifty minutes to clean it up. The online world is no different. Pressing the record button and expressing intellectual excrement does not take much time. Cleaning up the mess it creates takes much longer. What does this say about online consumers? Platforms? Power? What does it say about human nature and online "tribes"? Share your thoughts.

    3863721325K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 2026

    Sometimes the forest must burn to create fertile ground for stronger trees to grow. Destruction is not always loss; it can be an essential condition for depth and regrowth. Sometimes it is the price we have to pay so that roots, which would never have survived beneath the shade of what came before, are finally free to reach new heights. The problem is knowing when and how to spark that fire.

    18029519.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    Please share any ethical, psychological, spiritual and political insights that you have concerning the conquest of Makkah. Jazakum Allahu khayran.

    147831213K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026

    Can your daΚΏwah actually become a sin? In this powerful new OnGuard, Shaykh Shaqur Rehman tackles something every Muslim active online needs to think about: ikhlāṣ in the age of algorithms, likes and personal brands. An important one. Watch and share πŸ‘‡ Β  https://t.co/InkJ96PQoy

    10816207.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 2026

    πŸŽ™οΈ NEW ONGUARD EPISODE Why are so many Muslim men suffering in silence? Dr Hamza Andreas Tzortzis sits down with Ahmed Tomal of Tawfiq Therapy for an honest conversation about anxiety, depression, loneliness, addiction, suicidal thoughts and why men often struggle to ask for help. They also explore what therapy can offer Muslimsβ€”and where modern therapeutic culture can conflict with an Islamic understanding of masculinity, family and emotional wellbeing. Watch now: https://t.co/hcPssPmAHT

    8211408.4K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 2026

    π— π—’π——π—˜π—₯π—‘π—œπ—§π—¬ π—œπ—¦ 𝗔 π—ͺπ—’π—Ÿπ—™ π—œπ—‘ π—¦π—›π—˜π—˜π—£β€™π—¦ π—–π—Ÿπ—’π—§π—›π—œπ—‘π—š. Will you be devoured - or will you slaughter the wolf? You are being led. By fear. By comparison. By desire. By family expectations. By algorithms that profit from your insecurity. It is time to awaken the shepherd. To master yourself. To reclaim your direction. To lead your life - and refuse to be led towards destruction. This autumn, I will be travelling to universities across the world with π—¦π—›π—˜π—˜π—£ 𝗒π—₯ π—¦π—›π—˜π—£π—›π—˜π—₯𝗗? - a landmark student experience exploring identity, purpose, resilience and timeless lessons in leadership. 𝗑𝗒π—ͺ π—œπ—¦ π—§π—›π—˜ π—§π—œπ— π—˜. To bring the tour to your university, contact: πŸ“© [email protected]

    7696012K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    Why does the same allegation lead to a witch hunt for some, but silence for others? In the first issue of Think Aloud, a new weekly email by Dr. Hamza Tzortzis, he examines the tragic case of Dr. Jason Arday, anti-Black racism, and selective silence, asking what our outrage β€” and our silence β€” reveals about us. We've made this available for full public access; subscribe to Think Aloud to receive future editions direct to your inbox. https://t.co/iTiUEwjKW9

    6914306.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    Join me today, after Asr prayer, at Cambridge Central Mosque @CambCentMosque, where I will deliver the following lecture: "Mercy in Victory: The Conquest of Makkah" I will be sharing seven insights from the conquest of Makkah and eight lessons we can implement today. Insha'Allah. For more details please visit: https://t.co/v3H9NMilal

    546017.1K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 157 interactions against 252K followers, an engagement rate of 0.062%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.9K times each, and 1.77% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.52% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 70% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 6.9x its own typical post.

What is Hamza A. Tzortzis's engagement rate on X?
Hamza A. Tzortzis (@HATzortzis) has an engagement rate of 0.062%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 251,614 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.062%, Hamza A. Tzortzis sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @HATzortzis have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @HATzortzis post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going