Back to @HAPEsocial's profile

I Iape® engagement report

@HAPEsocial - 243K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.013%
of 243K followers
Per impression
0.575%
5.3K views on a typical post
Reach
2.18%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
30
interactions (median)
Saved
0.009%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.63/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 30 interactions against 243K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.3K times each, and 0.575% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.19% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.0K interactions, about 134x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026. Recurring tag: #nyfw.

Compared with accounts its own size

I Iape®'s engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 31% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.013%, I Iape® sits above the 10th percentile of the 158,247 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 158,247 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,964 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link13% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 89 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 26, 2026134x their median

    Fixed it. https://t.co/wer5qLYRwo

    3.1K2524812171.1M viewsView on X
  • May 18, 202658x their median

    https://t.co/T8NwI5GEYJ

    1.4K1171502737K viewsView on X
  • May 6, 202633x their median

    LIQUID FLOW 🤙@goodvibesclub Prompt in comment if you want to try it 😉 https://t.co/dotSFbM3rZ

    73446262491307K viewsView on X
  • Apr 20, 202616x their median

    Everyone posting "NFTs are back" today has never owned one. I was on the Bored Ape Council. 2021–22. Inside the cult during the peak. I watched people turn $30k into $2M, and I watched the same people turn $2M into nothing. I was one of them. $250k to zero in 2023. Every blue chip I held got halved, then quartered, then bidless. The line most people repeat now is that NFTs died. They didn't. What died was the pretending. The 10k-project grift. The airdrop farmers. The celebrity drops. The "utility" that was just a Discord tier. The whole machine that only worked while liquidity was infinite and every JPEG had a greater fool underneath it. What didn't die is the handful of collections where people actually wanted the thing. Look at what's happening right now. BAYC to CryptoPunks floor ratio went from 5:1 to 3:1 in a week. No ATH narrative driving it. No airdrop pumping the bag. No roadmap announcement. No celebrity tweet. Just floors moving. That's the signal. Everything else is noise. The first cycle was mimetic. People wanted apes because other people wanted apes. Supply of tourists was infinite, so demand looked infinite. When the tourists left, 99% of collections discovered they had no actual demand underneath, just a queue of people waiting to flip to the next guy. The collections bidding now are the ones where the queue was never the point. Where the holder base is the product. You can't fake that. You can only find out who has it after the music stops for two years. Which is what just happened. I lost a lot in 2023. What I learned is that the Lindy test for NFTs is silence. If a collection can survive 18 months of zero narrative, zero airdrops, zero hype, and still have a floor it's real. If it can't, it never was. Everyone about to chase this is going to buy the loudest comeback story. That's not the trade. The trade is the three collections that quietly held their floor through the worst of it. Those are the ones with holders, not renters. This isn't new money coming in. It's old money coming back for the only thing that was ever real.

    60066891238K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20263.7x their median

    HAPE PRIME: UNBOUND is live. Check your wallets. Contract: 0x3b09cc64797ef04c8878471038a5c432da57325c https://t.co/0CtxqDfVig

    7318183187K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20263.5x their median

    HAPE PRIME: UNBOUND is in wallets. Now we want to see yours. Post your FBH and tag us. We're watching every single one. 🦍🤍🍌 https://t.co/CQ8izAh2SH

    641723267K viewsView on X
  • Jul 8, 20263.0x their median

    Before the drop, we want to take a moment. To everyone who has believed in HAPE since day one. To those who have proudly held their HAPEs through every chapter. To everyone who continues to believe in what we're building. We see you. We appreciate you. And we haven't forgotten. This week, we're celebrating some of our most loyal holders as a small thank you for believing in HAPE through every chapter. Your Full Body is on its way. 🤝 And to our entire community- thank you. Whether you've been here since day one or joined us more recently, your support has helped shape HAPE into what it is today. We're excited for what's ahead. 🦍🤍🍌™️

    63101616.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20263.0x their median

    We weren't supposed to post these. 🦍🤍🍌 https://t.co/mh6Bcsoum8

    79550253K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 20262.8x their median

    Last week, every eligible HAPE holder received their Full Body HAPE. But that was only the beginning. Before the weekend... One question remains. What's coming next? 🦍🤍🍌 https://t.co/TDcW4P45zh

    54131518.6K viewsView on X
  • Jun 1, 20262.7x their median

    I Iapes, HAPE x UNDX Vol.3 Giveaway UNDX Vol.3 launches in just 3 days, and we’re excited to be featured with our own dedicated cover and editorial section. With only 1,500 copies available worldwide, we’re giving holders the chance to win a copy through this exclusive raffle. Check our Discord for full entry details and raffle instructions. @UNDOXXEDBOOK 🦍🤍🍌

    4822838.1K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#nyfw

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 30 interactions against 243K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.3K times each, and 0.575% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.19% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.0K interactions, about 134x its own typical post.

What is I Iape®'s engagement rate on X?
I Iape® (@HAPEsocial) has an engagement rate of 0.013%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 242,906 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.013%, I Iape® sits above the 10th percentile of the 158,247 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @HAPEsocial have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @HAPEsocial post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going