I Iape® engagement report
@HAPEsocial - 243K followers on X
Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 30 interactions against 243K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.3K times each, and 0.575% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.19% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.0K interactions, about 134x its own typical post.
Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026. Recurring tag: #nyfw.
Compared with accounts its own size
I Iape®'s engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 31% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.013%, I Iape® sits above the 10th percentile of the 158,247 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.128% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 13% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 89 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- May 26, 2026134x their median
Fixed it. https://t.co/wer5qLYRwo
- May 18, 202658x their median
https://t.co/T8NwI5GEYJ
- May 6, 202633x their median
LIQUID FLOW 🤙@goodvibesclub Prompt in comment if you want to try it 😉 https://t.co/dotSFbM3rZ
- Apr 20, 202616x their median
Everyone posting "NFTs are back" today has never owned one. I was on the Bored Ape Council. 2021–22. Inside the cult during the peak. I watched people turn $30k into $2M, and I watched the same people turn $2M into nothing. I was one of them. $250k to zero in 2023. Every blue chip I held got halved, then quartered, then bidless. The line most people repeat now is that NFTs died. They didn't. What died was the pretending. The 10k-project grift. The airdrop farmers. The celebrity drops. The "utility" that was just a Discord tier. The whole machine that only worked while liquidity was infinite and every JPEG had a greater fool underneath it. What didn't die is the handful of collections where people actually wanted the thing. Look at what's happening right now. BAYC to CryptoPunks floor ratio went from 5:1 to 3:1 in a week. No ATH narrative driving it. No airdrop pumping the bag. No roadmap announcement. No celebrity tweet. Just floors moving. That's the signal. Everything else is noise. The first cycle was mimetic. People wanted apes because other people wanted apes. Supply of tourists was infinite, so demand looked infinite. When the tourists left, 99% of collections discovered they had no actual demand underneath, just a queue of people waiting to flip to the next guy. The collections bidding now are the ones where the queue was never the point. Where the holder base is the product. You can't fake that. You can only find out who has it after the music stops for two years. Which is what just happened. I lost a lot in 2023. What I learned is that the Lindy test for NFTs is silence. If a collection can survive 18 months of zero narrative, zero airdrops, zero hype, and still have a floor it's real. If it can't, it never was. Everyone about to chase this is going to buy the loudest comeback story. That's not the trade. The trade is the three collections that quietly held their floor through the worst of it. Those are the ones with holders, not renters. This isn't new money coming in. It's old money coming back for the only thing that was ever real.
- Jul 20, 20263.7x their median
HAPE PRIME: UNBOUND is live. Check your wallets. Contract: 0x3b09cc64797ef04c8878471038a5c432da57325c https://t.co/0CtxqDfVig
- Jul 23, 20263.5x their median
HAPE PRIME: UNBOUND is in wallets. Now we want to see yours. Post your FBH and tag us. We're watching every single one. 🦍🤍🍌 https://t.co/CQ8izAh2SH
- Jul 8, 20263.0x their median
Before the drop, we want to take a moment. To everyone who has believed in HAPE since day one. To those who have proudly held their HAPEs through every chapter. To everyone who continues to believe in what we're building. We see you. We appreciate you. And we haven't forgotten. This week, we're celebrating some of our most loyal holders as a small thank you for believing in HAPE through every chapter. Your Full Body is on its way. 🤝 And to our entire community- thank you. Whether you've been here since day one or joined us more recently, your support has helped shape HAPE into what it is today. We're excited for what's ahead. 🦍🤍🍌™️
- Aug 14, 20263.0x their median
We weren't supposed to post these. 🦍🤍🍌 https://t.co/mh6Bcsoum8
- Jul 31, 20262.8x their median
Last week, every eligible HAPE holder received their Full Body HAPE. But that was only the beginning. Before the weekend... One question remains. What's coming next? 🦍🤍🍌 https://t.co/TDcW4P45zh
- Jun 1, 20262.7x their median
I Iapes, HAPE x UNDX Vol.3 Giveaway UNDX Vol.3 launches in just 3 days, and we’re excited to be featured with our own dedicated cover and editorial section. With only 1,500 copies available worldwide, we’re giving holders the chance to win a copy through this exclusive raffle. Check our Discord for full entry details and raffle instructions. @UNDOXXEDBOOK 🦍🤍🍌
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 30 interactions against 243K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.3K times each, and 0.575% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.19% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.0K interactions, about 134x its own typical post.
- What is I Iape®'s engagement rate on X?
- I Iape® (@HAPEsocial) has an engagement rate of 0.013%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 242,906 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.013%, I Iape® sits above the 10th percentile of the 158,247 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @HAPEsocial have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @HAPEsocial post?
- Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.63 posts per day across the measured window.