Back to @HAOHONG_CFA's profile

Hao HONG 洪灝, CFA engagement report

@HAOHONG_CFA - 363K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.027%
of 363K followers
Per impression
0.308%
32K views on a typical post
Reach
8.89%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
98
interactions (median)
Saved
0.06%
19 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.37/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 98 interactions against 363K followers, an engagement rate of 0.027%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 24,308 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 0.308% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.71% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.6K interactions, about 47x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Hao HONG 洪灝, CFA's engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (24,308 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 20% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.027%, Hao HONG 洪灝, CFA sits above the 25th percentile of the 244,015 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.027% to 0.158%.

p100.004%
p250.027%
p50 (median)0.158%
p750.745%
p902.77%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 244,015 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 20,103 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.027%
50th percentile0.158%
75th percentile0.745%
90th percentile2.77%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link25% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 25% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 461 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 13, 202647x their median

    Once upon a time in China. https://t.co/1Arnb9kze4

    4.4K239925846K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 202614x their median

    JUST IN 🚨: Chinese Traders are unwinding their leveraged trades at the fastest pace in more than a decade 🤯 👀 https://t.co/0Ne7TveqIN

    1.1K1862816160K viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 202614x their median

    The Coolest Kid on the Block. https://t.co/M65i5ABP69

    1.2K851037203K viewsView on X
  • May 31, 20262.2x their median

    Chinese consumers are showing signs of a renewed appetite for high-end beauty and fashion products, a rare bright spot for global luxury brands after years of weak demand and margin-eroding discounts in their most important growth market https://t.co/LgtmIRahyk

    307127910112K viewsView on X
  • Jun 17, 20261.7x their median

    Chinese economic data released yesterday were weak on the surface. Retail sales growth was negative, and growth in fixed assets and property investment declined further in May. The cash-for-clunkers subsidy has been suspended, and car sales were down 16%. Car sales alone dragged down retail sales growth by 150bps. However, service spending rose strongly by 5.4% y/y. It suggests consumer spending is now more on services than on goods. The Chinese consumer no longer uses things but instead uses experiences to define themselves. These numbers are consistent with our field observations. Further, while retail sales growth declined, high-tech exports were up strongly, diverging from the traditional manufacturing sector (chart). As such, economic data paint a picture of a country’s economy undergoing restructuring, and the process is powering ahead. This change is what we have been waiting for and talking about for years. Too much attention has been drawn to headline numbers without looking under the hood. And thus a wrong conclusion was drawn by consensus. Time to look at Chinese data differently.

    2524234972K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20263.1x their median

    A low-budget cartoon titled “Here Comes the Bull” is quickly surging to be the hottest meme in China. The movie was made for a few thousand yuan (a few hundred USD), reflecting the popular sarcasm in the Chinese A-share market. The animation is extremely crude. But the movie is embraced by the Chinese audience. Youngsters watch it and laugh, as a show of discontent with the burst of the semi bubble and a languishing stock market. Too bad - the movie has been pulled off the shelf. But it is destined to be a cult classic for years to come.

    2702051371K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20263.1x their median

    iPhone is getting older … And so are we. https://t.co/ajUHR9cWpb

    278207244K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20262.8x their median

    Zhu Rongji, a reformist and a leading figure in China’s economic restructuring, passed away today at the age of 98. “為學在嚴,嚴格認真,嚴謹求實,嚴師可出高徒。
 Be rigorous in learning: be strict and conscientious, be precise and realistic, and a strict teacher can train brilliant students. 為人要正,正大光明,正直清廉,正己然後正人。
 Be upright in conduct: be open and aboveboard, be honest and upright, and rectify oneself before rectifying others.” RIP.

    234380532K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20262.3x their median

    China is fiscally recapitalizing its big state banks. Basically, the MoF issues 300bn in special bonds to take part in the 350bn equity issuance by the banks/financial institutions. This is the third time in history China has recapitalized its banks: the first was in 2003, when the banking system was technically insolvent, with bad loans running at 40% at the time; the second was in 2008 during the subprime crisis. But that was to shore up AgBank for listing in HK. The recapitalization rate is running at 0.9% of GDP, substantially higher than the second time at 0.4% of GDP. The improvement in big banks' capital base was announced in March during the NPC and has made banks one of the best-performing sectors YTD, up 20%+; Bank of China surged 1/3 YTD, vs the tech-heavy ChiNext's flatish return YTD. Given the news has already been long anticipated, it's likely priced in. Essentially, this is a trade-off between improved lending ability from a better capital base and diluted EPS. Further, even if lending ability is improving, loan demand is very weak, and new loan growth is slipping into negative territory for the first time in history. More work is needed, not incremental tinkering. $FXI $KWEB $CQQQ $BABA

    196238259K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 20262.3x their median

    Just when you thought you were fully hedged... https://t.co/P119HvPtBs

    204191440K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 98 interactions against 363K followers, an engagement rate of 0.027%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 24,308 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 0.308% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.71% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.6K interactions, about 47x its own typical post.

What is Hao HONG 洪灝, CFA's engagement rate on X?
Hao HONG 洪灝, CFA (@HAOHONG_CFA) has an engagement rate of 0.027%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 363,315 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.027%, Hao HONG 洪灝, CFA sits above the 25th percentile of the 244,015 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @HAOHONG_CFA have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (24,308 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @HAOHONG_CFA post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going