Back to @H4ckmanac's profile

Hackmanac engagement report

@H4ckmanac - 136K followers on X

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.018%
of 136K followers
Per impression
0.247%
9.7K views on a typical post
Reach
7.44%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
24
interactions (median)
Saved
0.041%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.93/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 24 interactions against 136K followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.7K times each, and 0.247% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video, 42% are part of a thread and 97% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 62x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #hacktuesday, #iamnotavillain, #mondaypoll.

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #hacktuesday, #iamnotavillain, #mondaypoll.

Compared with accounts its own size

Hackmanac's engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 13% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.018%, Hackmanac sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,225 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,225 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,900 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video90% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link97% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 90% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 97% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 666 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 29, 202662x their median

    ๐ŸŸง #HackTuesday ๐ŸŸง Hack Tuesday: Week 23 - 29 Sep 2026 โš ๏ธ458 cyber attacks across 74 countries โš ๏ธ โžก๏ธThe most active threat actor last week was NoName057(16) claiming responsibility for 25 cyberattacks. โžก๏ธThe USA is the most affected country, accounting for 19% of incidents, with 87 cyber attacks. โžก๏ธThe Gov / Mil / LE sector is the most targeted, accounting for 19.7% of incidents with 90 cyber attacks. โžก๏ธThe estimated Critical cyber attacks account to 66 (14.4% of the total). โžก๏ธOverall, the claimed compromised data amounts to approximately 22.3 TB. More details: https://t.co/E124sZzEXA

    8584881142421K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 202636x their median

    ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต CYBER BULLETIN | Sharp rise in cyberattacks targeting Japan We are recording a substantial surge in cybercrime attacks targeting Japan, currently up 45.24% compared with the previous reporting period, with that percentage continuing to climb. We are monitoring developments and tracking newly reported incidents. Full details and impact assessment on https://t.co/yiQ1nOin8J

    51230124762K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202622x their median

    ๐ŸšจCyber Alert โ€ผ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ตJapan - ๐—ฌ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜ Yamato Transport confirmed unauthorised third-party access to its Kuroneko Deferred Payment Service. The company restricted external access and suspended the affected payment service while investigating the cause and scope of the intrusion. Threat actor: Not specified Sector: Transportation Data exposure (claimed): Not specified Data type: Not specified Observed: Sep 28, 2026 Status: Confirmed ESIXยฉ: 5.02 Full details and impact assessment on https://t.co/eB7qgxKFAa

    30918432248K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 202621x their median

    ๐ŸšจCyber Alert โ€ผ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธSpain - ๐—”๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ณ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ฒ Hackers carried out a multi-day cyberattack against Spanish railway operators Adif and Renfe, allegedly stealing around 500 GB of data. According to El Mundo, the attackers reportedly used AI to identify vulnerabilities in Adifโ€™s website, then gained access to its cloud environment and subsequently to Renfeโ€™s website. Most of the alleged data theft occurred on September 24, 2026. The stolen data may include traveler information, though this remains unconfirmed. Renfe said that only limited, non-sensitive data was accessed and that payment and DNI information were not compromised. Authorities are also investigating whether human error contributed to the breach. Threat actor: Not specified Sector: Transportation Data exposure (claimed): 500 GB Data type: Traveller information (unconfirmed) Observed: Sep 25, 2026 Status: Confirmed ESIXยฉ: 5.60 Full details and impact assessment on https://t.co/eB7qgxKFAa

    352125142496K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 202615x their median

    ๐ŸšจCyber Alert โ€ผ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธSpain - ๐—๐˜‚๐—ป๐˜๐—ฎ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—”๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜‚๐—ฐรญ๐—ฎ Meduza Locker hacking group claims to have breached Junta de Andalucรญa. According to the threat actor, the compromised data includes client, confidential, financial, HR, legal, marketing and technical data. Threat actor: Meduza Locker Sector: Gov / Mil / LE Data exposure (claimed): Not specified Data type: Client, confidential, financial, HR, legal, marketing and technical data, and reports Observed: Sep 28, 2026 Status: Pending verification ESIXยฉ: 5.58 Full details and impact assessment on https://t.co/eB7qgxKFAa

    230107121927K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202611x their median

    ๐Ÿš€ ๐Ž๐ฎ๐ซ ๐“๐ก๐ซ๐ž๐š๐ญ ๐ˆ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐š๐œ๐ญ ๐’๐ข๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐š๐ญ๐จ๐ซ (๐“๐ˆ๐’) ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฅ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž! ๐Ÿ“ฃ This is the most powerful feature HackRisk has ever built, and the ๐จ๐ง๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐จ๐ง๐ž ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ค๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐ฅ๐. While most tools only tell you what's happening, HackRisk tells you what it means for your bottom line. ๐๐ฎ๐š๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐Ÿ๐ฒ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ž ๐œ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐œ๐ฒ๐›๐ž๐ซ ๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐ค with auditable, scenario-based impact modelling based on our database of 60,000+ real incidents, and get: ๐ŸŽฏ Your most probable threat scenario ๐Ÿ’ฅ Your most damaging threat scenario ๐Ÿ’ธ Your estimated loss range in case of breach Leveraging our ESIXยฉ (Estimated Severity Index) framework and Threat Impact Simulator engine, we now enable CISOs, risk managers, and insurers to model SLE, quantify business disruption, and simulate both typical and extreme loss scenarios, supporting compliance requirements (DORA, NIS2, SEC cyber disclosure rules among others). Know exactly what your worst cyber scenario is, and what a breach would cost you. ๐๐จ ๐œ๐ซ๐ž๐๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ, ๐ง๐จ ๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ-๐ช๐ฎ๐ž๐ซ๐ฒ ๐Ÿ๐ž๐ž๐ฌ, ๐ง๐จ ๐ก๐ข๐๐๐ž๐ง ๐œ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฌ. ๐Ž๐ง๐ž ๐Ÿ๐ฅ๐š๐ญ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐ข๐œ๐ž. ๐–๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐š๐ง ๐ž๐ฑ๐ญ๐ซ๐š ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•% ๐จ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ (๐Ÿ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ก๐ฌ ๐Ÿ๐ซ๐ž๐ž) ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐š๐ง๐ง๐ฎ๐š๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐š๐ง๐ฌ. Stop guessing. Start quantifying. Explore TIS now โžก๏ธ https://t.co/wiu0eBfvQ0

    2452280770K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 202611x their median

    ๐ŸšจCyber Alert โ€ผ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ตJapan - ๐—›๐—ผ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—น ๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—›๐—ถ๐—น๐—น ๐—œ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—ฎ Hotel Grand Hill Ichigaya in Japan warned guests of possible data exposure following unauthorized access to its third-party reservation-management provider, Temairazu, on September 21, 2026. A security issue in a previously supplied installed version may have allowed attackers to access guest reservation information. Some guests subsequently received WhatsApp phishing messages requesting reservation confirmation, credit card details or urgent payments. Potentially affected reservations were booked on or before September 21 for stays beginning on or after that date. Threat actor: Not specified Sector: Hospitality Data exposure (claimed): Not specified Data type: Guest reservation information Observed: Sep 21, 2026 Status: Pending verification ESIXยฉ: 4.87 Full details and impact assessment on https://t.co/eB7qgxKFAa

    1559641321K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 202611x their median

    ๐ŸšจCyber Alert โ€ผ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ตJapan - ๐—ง๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐— ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† / ๐—ง๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—–๐—”๐—ฅ / ๐—ง๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—•๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ Times Mobility, operator of Japanโ€™s Times CAR car-sharing service, confirmed that an unauthorized third party obtained data linked to approximately 6.6 million accounts after breaching its web system. The incident was detected on September 25, 2026, and the intrusion route was blocked by the following morning. Compromised data may include names, contact details, dates of birth, driverโ€™s license and identity documents, corporate-member information, hashed passwords, and linked-service IDs. Affected individuals include current and former members, as well as some applicants who did not complete registration. Threat actor: Not specified Sector: Transportation Data exposure (claimed): 6.6 million accounts Data type: Names, contact details, dates of birth, driver's licence and identity documents, corporate-member information, hashed passwords and linked-service IDs Observed: Sep 25, 2026 Status: Confirmed ESIXยฉ: 6.75 Full details and impact assessment on https://t.co/eB7qgxKFAa

    165771920K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20269.8x their median

    ๐ŸšจCyber Alertโ€ผ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธSpain - Real Federaciรณn Espaรฑola de Fรบtbol The Royal Spanish Football Federation (RFEF) disclosed that its online ticketing platform suffered a temporary outage after its systems were hit by a high volume of malicious external traffic, consistent with a DDoS disruption. The incident forced the RFEF to temporarily suspend ticket sales while security and business-continuity procedures were activated with its technology providers. Full details and impact assessment on https://t.co/eB7qgxLdpI

    15757111031K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20269.5x their median

    ๐ŸšจCyber Alert โ€ผ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ตJapan - ๐—ž๐—ฒ๐—ถ๐—ผ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป (๐—ž๐—ฒ๐—ถ๐—ผ ๐—˜๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐—ฅ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—น๐˜„๐—ฎ๐˜†) Keio Corporation (Keio Electric Railway) disclosed that it detected a ransomware attack against servers belonging to the Keio Group in the early hours of September 26, 2026, causing system disruptions. The attack affected business systems at some group companies, while railway operations remained unaffected. Keio is investigating the attack vector and whether confidential corporate information or customer data may have been exfiltrated. Threat actor: Not specified Sector: Transportation / Storage Data exposure (claimed): Not specified Data type: Not specified Observed: Sep 26, 2026 Status: Confirmed ESIXยฉ: 5.60 Full details and impact assessment on https://t.co/eB7qgxKFAa

    149684823K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#hacktuesday#iamnotavillain#mondaypoll#riskfriday

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 24 interactions against 136K followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.7K times each, and 0.247% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video, 42% are part of a thread and 97% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 62x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #hacktuesday, #iamnotavillain, #mondaypoll.

What is Hackmanac's engagement rate on X?
Hackmanac (@H4ckmanac) has an engagement rate of 0.018%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 135,749 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.018%, Hackmanac sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,225 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @H4ckmanac have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @H4ckmanac post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going