Back to @H1TWOM4N's profile

Ash engagement report

@H1TWOM4N - 78K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.872%
of 78K followers
Per impression
3.23%
21K views on a typical post
Reach
27.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
678
interactions (median)
Saved
0.05%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.93/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 678 interactions against 78K followers, an engagement rate of 0.872%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 3.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 27.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 30% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 202K interactions, about 298x its own typical post.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ash's engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 75% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.872%, Ash sits above the 75th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.499% to 2.09%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video60% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 60% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 118 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 7, 2026298x their median

    Been thinking about this comment for 3 days https://t.co/yQe9KLjnNo

    195K6.6K3337744.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202686x their median

    If you just saw me screaming in the middle of Dublin airport at a couple I’m very sorry but they were literally verbally abusing and smacking their 2 year old child. I was yelling at them to look at me and they couldn’t even meet my eyes. Disgusting parents

    57K781110261.2M viewsView on X
  • Apr 4, 202577x their median

    Still can’t believe I did this with my own hands tbh https://t.co/pdwr5GVJ7U

    49K2.5K301991.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202636x their median

    Just said “I miss when mine were that age” to another mum on this flight and then went back to my steamdeck like https://t.co/TUdt3l3JgL

    24K33556256K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202621x their median

    I’m in a sports bar rn eating mozzarella sticks and they are playing Like A Prayer by Madonna https://t.co/2LWd8h26Uk

    14K297618138K viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 202618x their median

    When cicero is mentioned in any context I’m just thinking about the freaked out jester from skyrim - the other one is none of my concern

    11K1.2K5242393K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 20269.9x their median

    I’ve got thousands of spiders in there https://t.co/sXraA8Mn6h

    6.6K27455342K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20267.1x their median

    Putting on the heaving naturals vest, blowing my whistle demurely https://t.co/Bji6eti6MH

    4.7K1246290K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20265.8x their median

    I’m literally in ur device right now? lol https://t.co/tHtXV9SaA3

    3.9K26350108K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20264.9x their median

    When I was in the psych ward years ago a schizophrenic man who was going to prison for doing something Very Bad begged for us to watch A Beautiful Mind on movie night and every time Russel Crowe did something amazing was like “that’s just like me”

    3.2K55131079K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 678 interactions against 78K followers, an engagement rate of 0.872%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 3.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 27.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 30% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 202K interactions, about 298x its own typical post.

What is Ash's engagement rate on X?
Ash (@H1TWOM4N) has an engagement rate of 0.872%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 77,709 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.872%, Ash sits above the 75th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @H1TWOM4N have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @H1TWOM4N post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going