Back to @GyanTherapy's profile

Rakesh engagement report

@GyanTherapy - 280K followers on X

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.208%
of 280K followers
Per impression
3.49%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
5.94%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
581
interactions (median)
Saved
0.048%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.47/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 581 interactions against 280K followers, an engagement rate of 0.208%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 3.49% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 44% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 104K interactions, about 190x its own typical post.

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Rakesh's engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 78% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.208%, Rakesh sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video38% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link44% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 38% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 44% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 181 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 7, 2022190x their median

    Let us know it when it folds. 💁‍♀️

    75K12K4.1K12KView on X
  • Sep 19, 202623x their median

    Every phone should show Google Maps navigation on the Always-On Display - just like Pixel phones do. https://t.co/xc9xMQ4NhX

    13K32423847445K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 202615x their median

    We should thank all internet media. Yes, Internet media - Not the TV media which has done the most to mislead people, No matter what the issue is. They are not standing with the public.

    7.1K811103868K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 202613x their median

    Today I watched several videos of the protest. Watching students being beaten like that was deeply disturbing. People can have different political opinions but this went too far !

    6.3K5661341183K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20268.9x their median

    Hey Apple what kind of software refinement is this? 🤨 iPhone 18 Pro - iOS 27 https://t.co/utAbzhSdKe

    4.8K101220251.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20268.5x their median

    Just ordered the iPhone 18 Pro but my 17 Pro cracked right before it arrived and I don’t have AppleCare+ 💔😭 https://t.co/hjWgWxKMlO

    4.6K5332113890K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20265.3x their median

    Ek cheap brand - wahi legal notice wala ! Kisi ne mere mana karne ke baad bhi is brand ke 2 phones buy kiye the aur dono kaafi jaldi kharaab ho gaye. Ab service centre ke chakkar lagane pad rahe hain. So please - stay away from this brand waise phone kisi bhi Brand ka kharaab ho sakta hai lekin jo pahle se 3rd class product beechta ho uska jaldi kahraab ka chance hai. Isse better market mein aur bhi brands aur options available hain !! Sale ke time aapko alag-alag tareeke se is brand ki promotion dikh sakti hai but aapko smart decision lena hai.

    2.8K10616313236K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20264.9x their median

    I made a video about a product & pointed out its problems. Instead of sending a legal notice like A Farzi Plus Minus type or getting defensive the brand sent me their latest product with a kind of apology and said they’ve used new technology to fix those issues. They also said - You can talk about this product too. Our goal is to build this brand for the long term. Should I make a video on their new product or not ? BTW it’s not a smartphone brand !

    2.5K592463127K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 20264.6x their median

    Why is no one on the internet talking about this? The iPhone DUO’s inner display color experience is not Great - when using it outdoors or sitting near a window. The display looks less contrasty and the colors appear slightly washed out maybe because of matt screen protector display !

    2.4K10515914143K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20264.7x their median

    In today's world before saying anything that isn't even political, If we feel the need to start with "This is not political..." That alone says a lot about where we've reached. BTW this is also not poltical !

    2.3K18447732K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 581 interactions against 280K followers, an engagement rate of 0.208%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 3.49% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 44% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 104K interactions, about 190x its own typical post.

What is Rakesh's engagement rate on X?
Rakesh (@GyanTherapy) has an engagement rate of 0.208%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 279,926 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.208%, Rakesh sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @GyanTherapy have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @GyanTherapy post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going