Back to @Guggenheim's profile

Guggenheim New York engagement report

@Guggenheim - 3.0M followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 3.0M followers
Per impression
0.737%
5.6K views on a typical post
Reach
0.18%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
41
interactions (median)
Saved
0.054%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.57/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 41 interactions against 3.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.6K times each, and 0.737% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.185% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video and 24% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions, about 42x its own typical post.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Guggenheim New York's engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 40% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Guggenheim New York sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video94% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link24% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 94% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 24% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 530 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 23, 202642x their median

    A courtside icon is coming our way. 👝👀🏀 Stay tuned for the reveal tomorrow. https://t.co/C0Rbi2Q3n5

    2.6K29621105709K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202630x their median

    For seventy years she turned obsession into infinity — the dots, the pumpkins, the mirrored rooms that dissolve the wall between a person and the universe. Yayoi Kusama broke through frontiers no one had mapped, and she changed the history of avant-garde art along the way. We are so grateful for Kusama's work, for her belief in love and peace, & for a relationship with the Guggenheim that spanned much of her life. Significant works live on in our collections in New York, Bilbao, and Abu Dhabi, including her INFINITY MIRRORED ROOM — DANCING LIGHTS THAT FLEW UP TO THE UNIVERSE (2019) currently on view in "Guggenheim Pop: 1960–Now." Our deepest condolences to her family, her friends, her colleagues, and to everyone who found something of themselves in her work. Images: (1) Kusama creating for the "My Eternal Soul" series in her studio 2014, Yayoi Kusama Museum. (2) Installation view, "Guggenheim Pop: 1960 to Now." David Heald.

    963248121629K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 202622x their median

    This is your final weekend to see Vasily Kandinsky’s "Several Circles." As this work goes off view, another Kandinsky artwork from our collection will take its place. Stay tuned for the reveal. ✨ Vasily Kandinsky, "Several Circles," January–February 1926. https://t.co/Ye4LNJrKGY

    71516214923K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 202610x their median

    For the cover of the August 10, 2026 issue of The New Yorker, the painter and graphic novelist Eric Drooker depicted the Guggenheim as a cool clearing in a forest. “I grew up amid Manhattan’s monotonous grid and found the endless boxes, aligned along strict perpendiculars, overwhelming. As a child, the Guggenheim’s round form was my oasis,” Drooker said. “In a hectic, crowded metropolis, it was a breath of fresh air, a return to nature.” See the cover on stands now! #FrankLloydWrightFridays

    3307014618K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20269.4x their median

    Today marks 25 years since the 9/11 attacks. We at the Guggenheim New York are honored to join @911Memorial in remembrance and share this picture of the sky today. #RememberTheSky #NeverForget911 https://t.co/Grf3ZQnbV5

    2917912512K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20268.5x their median

    Renowned artist, author, and activist Faith Ringgold was born on this day in 1930. Ringgold transformed the traditional story quilt into a powerful vehicle for exploring race, gender, family, and freedom. In 2025, we celebrated the artist in "Collection in Focus: The Reach of Faith Ringgold," an exhibition exploring her artistic influences and enduring impact on generations of artists. In "Tar Beach" (1988), the first quilt in Ringgold’s "Women on a Bridge" series, eight-year-old Cassie Louise Lightfoot dreams of flying above Harlem, declaring, “I can fly.” Her flight becomes a powerful symbol of freedom and self-possession, imagining a world where liberation can be claimed on one’s own terms. _______ Faith Ringgold, "Woman on a Bridge #1 of 5: Tar Beach," 1988. © 2026 Faith Ringgold / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York, Courtesy ACA Galleries, New York.

    25487338.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20268.4x their median

    From deep blues to warm earth tones, the colors of Kandinsky's Study for "Landscape with Tower” invite a closer look. 🎨 Spend your weekend with the changing moods, landscapes, and perspectives in "Collection in Focus: Modern European Currents."🌀 Vasily Kandinsky, Study for “Landscape with Tower,” 1908.

    267677516K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20268.0x their median

    This isn't your ordinary scrapbook. Built from fragments of everyday life, Shinro Ohtake’s "Scrapbook #62" is a world of layered images, textures, and materials. Senior Conservator Jeffrey Warda takes a closer look and explores the artist’s handmade book, uncovering the unexpected objects and techniques woven throughout the work, from ink drawings and collage to repurposed everyday materials. Discover how conservation reveals the materials, methods, and stories embedded within this remarkable artist’s book. See this work on view in "Guggenheim Pop: 1960 to Now."

    2426911622K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20267.7x their median

    Happy Birthday Peggy Guggenheim 🎂🤍 A driving and charismatic force who revolutionized the art world, Peggy Guggenheim was born on this day. She championed artists before they became icons, collected the art of her time, opened galleries dedicated to modern art, and transformed her Venetian home into a place where everyone could experience it. Today, her vision continues to inspire millions of visitors from around the world. Happy birthday to the woman who was always one step ahead 💫 📹: Peggy Guggenheim Collection

    238695512K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20267.1x their median

    World Photo Day calls for a favorite subject: our iconic facade. 📸🌀 From its sweeping curves to its unmistakable silhouette, there’s no shortage of angles to discover. A true New York classic—and one we’ll never get tired of photographing. Photo: © David Heald. https://t.co/Elq9ZGQ7J1

    228498511K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 41 interactions against 3.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.6K times each, and 0.737% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.185% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video and 24% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions, about 42x its own typical post.

What is Guggenheim New York's engagement rate on X?
Guggenheim New York (@Guggenheim) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 3,011,494 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Guggenheim New York sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Guggenheim have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Guggenheim post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going