Grummz engagement report
@Grummz - 305K followers on X
Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 3.1K interactions against 305K followers, an engagement rate of 1.02%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 92K times each, and 3.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 30.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 72% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 90K interactions, about 29x its own typical post.
Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Grummz's engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 78% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 1.02%, Grummz sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.679% to 2.56%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.679% |
| 90th percentile | 2.56% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 72% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 10% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 72% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 10% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 283 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 15, 202629x their median
On the hardest difficulty btw w/ all accessibility opts off 😂😂 DO NOT WASTE YOUR MONEY ON THIS GAME! It’s absurd that a M rated game will hold your hand this much, & play itself like we’re children lol @antonkostalas great stream! Go support! #PS5 #Wolverine #PlayStation https://t.co/W0G7LAtwVL
- Sep 12, 202629x their median
in honor of Marvel's Wolverine, we added a AAA mode in case you can't find the giant haystack https://t.co/y3mq2HrcPx
- Oct 15, 202617x their median
Steam just got a little faster. Valve has released a new Steam update that improves startup performance. In a user test, Steam launched in 5.23 seconds, beating the 5.47 seconds claimed by Epic “vibe-coded” launcher Now Steam has pushed a major update and is faster than epic games >Improved startup performance >New Big Picture features >A new screensaver system, including the classic bouncing Steam logo >Steam Controller improvements > Several Linux improvements and fixes >A new experimental video codec for Remote Play >Lots of smaller fixes and quality-of-life improvements
- Feb 20, 202619x their median
Xbox is fucked. https://t.co/crVcvad5ty
- Sep 28, 20268.9x their median
Got any other predictions for us Mr. Genius? https://t.co/hlbXSg0TAY
- Sep 18, 20267.6x their median
Watching @Asmongold rally the chuds to his WoW Forever guild to take back videogames. He's been inviting everrrrrryone. We're so back. https://t.co/NtpSM79spa
- Oct 10, 20267.1x their median
Chuds win again, Dead by Daylight is changing Feng Min’s Legendary outfit after community backlash. The devs have confirmed that the 2B-inspired outfit will receive adjustments to make it look closer to the original character from NieR:Automata. The changes are planned for a future bug-fix patch, with the second patch mentioned as a possibility, no confirmed release date yet. It looks like complain and bullying these companys works
- Sep 3, 20266.7x their median
GPT-6 Astra built this Manhattan world in Unreal Engine over the course of a week. It was literally able to go street by street to make each one perfect. https://t.co/7VTol9QfHq
- Sep 16, 20265.0x their median
🚨BREAKING: Borderlands 4's new DLC has a dialogue that includes "disguised" political commentary on ICE (U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement) "At least it's not cold, I hate ice. I hate... ice. So much. I wish there were no ice. It doesn't make anybody safer. It's just a hazard" Then they try to be cheeky with "Referring here to frozen water" A Redditor also notes that it has a quest description that "goes on an anti-capitalism rant and ends with 'anyway this is like that quest in the game where a twink gets swallowed by a giant fish'" So much for the goodwill that was brought by the hot Loveless DLC... These people can't help themselves from trying to sabotage their own game for political propaganda.
- Oct 17, 20264.7x their median
Лучшее, что я видел за последнее время — чел пилит ASCII MMORPG, в которой вся графика состоит из букв и символов. Да, буквально весь мир, персонажи, окружение и спецэффекты нарисованы разноцветным текстом. Автор сейчас экспериментирует с магией, визуалом и боссами. Я прям залип на то, как из нескольких десятков символов получается такая красота. Буквально сны при температуре 37,2. Via: https://t.co/vtYXAaEioi
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 3.1K interactions against 305K followers, an engagement rate of 1.02%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 92K times each, and 3.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 30.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 72% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 90K interactions, about 29x its own typical post.
- What is Grummz's engagement rate on X?
- Grummz (@Grummz) has an engagement rate of 1.02%, based on the median interactions across 29 original posts from the last 30 days against 304,629 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 1.02%, Grummz sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Grummz have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Grummz post?
- Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.4 posts per day across the measured window.