Back to @GroovyBruce's profile

Bruce Campbell engagement report

@GroovyBruce - 725K followers on X

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.114%
of 725K followers
Per impression
2.45%
34K views on a typical post
Reach
4.63%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
824
interactions (median)
Saved
0.051%
17 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.63/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 824 interactions against 725K followers, an engagement rate of 0.114%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 2.45% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.64% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 47% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 174K interactions, about 281x its own typical post.

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Bruce Campbell's engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 73% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.114%, Bruce Campbell sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,342 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.141%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,342 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,901 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video60% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link47% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 60% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 47% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 134 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Mar 3, 2026281x their median

    https://t.co/xnBYzY4wsS

    143K20K7.4K3.8K4.8M viewsView on X
  • Jun 22, 202645x their median

    I made it to 68. Still Shemping! https://t.co/Uziwj0L1l3

    26K1.5K743102398K viewsView on X
  • Feb 4, 202649x their median

    Nice to see that moxie still works. YouTube star Markiplier’s fans blitzed theaters with requests to show “Iron Lung,” triggering a booking frenzy that led to the movie’s opening in more than 4,000 theaters worldwide. https://t.co/XQciXVx5BT via @WSJ

    16K1.5K109108496K viewsView on X
  • Mar 25, 202627x their median

    Episode 4 now streaming! GROOVY. https://t.co/hIjJEEE5ty

    15K9713312521.5M viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 202626x their median

    If you’ve never seen an Evil Dead movie before, you might want to practice before seeing this one. It all Burns on 7/10. https://t.co/wo8IDC8CSy

    14K1.2K28478881K viewsView on X
  • Jan 15, 202660x their median

    Marcus endured long days of torment, battling the undead under desert skies and in heavy armor for Army of Darkness. He never complained. A very sweet guy. Safe travels, sir. https://t.co/JsbEuM4h1w https://t.co/9tiA9D2nHe

    13K1.3K17032203K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202617x their median

    Tim Curry Dead: 'Rocky Horror Picture Show' Star Was 80 I did Congo and Mchale’s Navy with Tim. A bundle of talent. During Congo, Tim told me he got letters from small movie theaters thanking him for Rocky Horror - it kept their theaters alive. Sail on! https://t.co/14XqHiAzVb

    13K1.1K12414121K viewsView on X
  • Mar 7, 202618x their median

    The perfect time for a kitty cat picture. https://t.co/MPhbPj7lfJ

    10K64323217118K viewsView on X
  • Mar 22, 202617x their median

    I found great satisfaction in playing Ash because he was so amazingly flawed - so mortal. https://t.co/oC7THvdqbD

    9.8K64432327173K viewsView on X
  • Mar 9, 202616x their median

    Hey folks, It’s time for the salmon to return to the spawning grounds. The Redford Theater was a critical component of those early influences that fueled my desire to make movies. When Evil Dead premiered, the Redford was the obvious choice. 45 years later, I’m delighted to show you my latest flick at this grand old palace which has been lovingly maintained all these decades. I’ll see you soon for a raucous Q&A after the show! Emphatically yours, Bruce https://t.co/v4EHAjjSMK

    9.0K58810114242K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 824 interactions against 725K followers, an engagement rate of 0.114%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 2.45% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.64% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 47% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 174K interactions, about 281x its own typical post.

What is Bruce Campbell's engagement rate on X?
Bruce Campbell (@GroovyBruce) has an engagement rate of 0.114%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 725,086 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.114%, Bruce Campbell sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,342 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @GroovyBruce have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @GroovyBruce post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going