Back to @GridGamingIO's profile

Grid Gaming engagement report

@GridGamingIO - 200K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.177%
of 200K followers
Per impression
1.06%
34K views on a typical post
Reach
16.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
356
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.17/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 356 interactions against 200K followers, an engagement rate of 0.177%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 1.06% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 33x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Grid Gaming's engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 44% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.177%, Grid Gaming sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.697%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,656 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,418 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video80% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link10% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 80% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 10% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 333 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 15, 202633x their median

    Welcome to the future of money. GoMining empowers people worldwide to unlock Bitcoin's full potential — we enable our customers to earn and use Bitcoin effortlessly and securely, all in one app. Are you ready to join the movement? https://t.co/DLKRbmFk1t

    10K589976523.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20264.0x their median

    🇺🇸 BREAKING: Senate Republicans release new Clarity Act text, their “LAST, BEST AND FINAL” offer ahead of Tuesday’s crucial cloture vote, per Eleanor Terrett. The latest text revises DeFi-related provisions to the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA), Stablecoin Yield and the “Ag. title,” while keeping the key ethics negotiations at the center of the debate. - Ethics: Trump has agreed to roughly 80% of the Tillis-Gallego proposal, including requiring covered officials to divest substantial crypto interests or place them in a blind trust. State attorneys general would also gain enforcement authority. - BRCA: Republicans are narrowing protections around the Bank Secrecy Act and civil enforcement, with broader criminal-case protections reportedly removed from the proposal. - Stablecoin Yield: Negotiators are still battling over safeguards against stablecoins pulling deposits away from community banks, with a potential “circuit breaker” under discussion. - Agriculture Title: The revised language adds tighter guardrails around vertical integration, affiliate trading and conflicts involving digital-commodity exchanges, brokers and dealers, while clarifying that state consumer-protection laws remain intact. The Senate needs 60 votes to advance the bill on Tuesday, making this the latest attempt to win enough Democratic support before the vote.

    1.2K1896625248K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20262.7x their median

    Shareholders, Our newest game, Subway Runner is officially live at https://t.co/nAMOODKRWC . This is our first game utilizing the NetNet RealTime Pricing Feed for Equities. The game lets you take a 100x long or short on NVDA, race against your own liquidation and try to win.

    763102732882K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20262.4x their median

    thinking about tokens

    583322221038K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20261.6x their median

    GM. In Web3 games, trust improves when incident reviews examine systems, incentives, and decisions instead of stopping at the headline. https://t.co/J3xcYcehmm

    4803542033K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 2026

    A player-owned item means more when its onchain provenance is visible: every craft, win, and upgrade becomes part of one verifiable history. The artifact is not just owned. Its record shows how it became rare. https://t.co/69XKCi3KrF

    3602834024K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 2026

    GM, Grid gamers 🤖 Saved payment methods and faster checkout could make payment rails invisible inside Web3 game economies, where they belong. https://t.co/7uZOrHYRC2

    3423517025K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 2026

    GM — in crypto, the real handicap isn’t lacking resources; it’s mistaking average gameplay for a winning strategy. https://t.co/Icv6M4ZrL9

    2094761035K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026

    Being optimistic about crypto is easy. The harder test is shipping games people return to before they care what chain they’re on.

    1604851037K viewsView on X
  • May 25, 2026

    'The Big 4' = the most fundamental trade recently? CT's still yapping about the main fundamental trade of the last few months: $HYPE, $ZEC, $NEAR, $VVV Everyone's scouting for similar tokens that could benefit from growing privacy hype Here's the play most are missing rn 🧵 https://t.co/Qk4XMXvgFT

    823067117K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 356 interactions against 200K followers, an engagement rate of 0.177%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 1.06% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 33x its own typical post.

What is Grid Gaming's engagement rate on X?
Grid Gaming (@GridGamingIO) has an engagement rate of 0.177%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 199,891 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.177%, Grid Gaming sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @GridGamingIO have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @GridGamingIO post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going