Back to @GretchenPSmith's profile

Gretchen Smith🇺🇸 engagement report

@GretchenPSmith - 300K followers on X

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.291%
of 300K followers
Per impression
7.99%
11K views on a typical post
Reach
3.64%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
873
interactions (median)
Saved
0.028%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 873 interactions against 300K followers, an engagement rate of 0.291%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 7.99% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.64% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 42% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 2.3x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #codeofvets, #nvda.

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026. Recurring tags: #codeofvets, #nvda.

Compared with accounts its own size

Gretchen Smith🇺🇸's engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 96% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.291%, Gretchen Smith🇺🇸 sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,258 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,968 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video42% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link11% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 42% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 11% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 167 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 30, 20262.3x their median

    The holidays will be here before we know it. Bracing for it. My family will be gathering in Ohio with his family for Thanksgiving. I will be spending my first Thanksgiving divorced/alone. My family needs to do this. There is a lot of healing that needs to happen. This is just another milestone, there are so many. I am trying to decide do I go on a trip for a couple of days or hunker down and help veterans… Divorce is hell. We do survive. The answer is get up every morning and keep moving.

    1.5K105353926K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.3x their median

    Walking out the stress. Talking to God. Getting stronger. Ready to live laugh and love AND help veterans of course🤗❤️💪🏽 https://t.co/BpEIZAViBF

    1.8K83131421K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.1x their median

    Yes data centers are necessary, but it can be done with transparency and no tax increases for residents. To the people who are being rude and ridiculous. Remove yourself from my page or I will do it for you❤️ I am nice until it is time not to be nice. https://t.co/ECI3vkJcBv

    1.5K105218919K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20261.6x their median

    GLUTE BUILD (HEAVY + SHAPE) 1. Barbell Hip Thrust     •    4 sets x 10 reps     •    2 sec squeeze at top 👉 MOST IMPORTANT EXERCISE 2. Romanian Deadlift (DB)     •    4 x 10 👉 Stretch glutes, slow negative 3. Walking Lunges     •    3 x 12 each leg 90 min walk 50 incline pushups.

    1.3K50115818K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026

    Look what someone sent me. They Changed my pic! Pretty sure it was a liberal trying to make a point🙄 https://t.co/k8sVyqdjLX

    966572031323K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026

    Anybody ever feel like running away? If I ever disappear… I may be rucking around in Thailand somewhere😇🤔🤭😂

    855422141226K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026

    Do not underestimate me. I may be healing and in transition, but I am strong, hard working and stubborn AF. Surrender is not in my vocabulary. Giving up, quitting, sitting in darkness forever isn’t me either. Veteran Strong. #codeofvets https://t.co/5TFGLjwlbl

    814916939.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026

    I cannot drink black coffee. Headed to the store to get some h/h. What a morning🙃Good morning. New day. New week. New beginnings.

    72434132111K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 2026

    Good morning🇺🇸☕️Headed to Orange Beach AL to breathe and relax. Anybody else going away for the holiday?

    68827158410K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026

    I am a bit of a wild card today. Buckle up. 😂😁🤣

    747249759.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#codeofvets#nvda

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 873 interactions against 300K followers, an engagement rate of 0.291%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 7.99% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.64% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 42% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 2.3x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #codeofvets, #nvda.

What is Gretchen Smith🇺🇸's engagement rate on X?
Gretchen Smith🇺🇸 (@GretchenPSmith) has an engagement rate of 0.291%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 299,994 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.291%, Gretchen Smith🇺🇸 sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @GretchenPSmith have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @GretchenPSmith post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going

Gretchen Smith🇺🇸 (@GretchenPSmith) Engagement Rate - 0.291% | PlayerSells