Back to @GreggBraden's profile

Gregg Braden engagement report

@GreggBraden - 143K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.063%
of 143K followers
Per impression
3.33%
2.7K views on a typical post
Reach
1.89%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
90
interactions (median)
Saved
0.111%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.53/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 90 interactions against 143K followers, an engagement rate of 0.063%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.7K times each, and 3.33% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.89% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 530 interactions, about 5.9x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Gregg Braden's engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 76% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.063%, Gregg Braden sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link50% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 50% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 281 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 30, 20265.9x their median

    Remembering two extraordinary souls I was blessed to call dear friends, Louise Hay and Dr. Wayne Dyer. Their wisdom, love, and beautiful spirits continue to touch lives around the world. What teaching, memory, or quote from Louise or Wayne has stayed with you? https://t.co/7LUFQgnGNO

    463303437.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20263.6x their median

    There’s a quiet moment before every gathering begins that I treasure. Before stepping onstage in Tampa Bay, I took a moment to be still, feel the energy of the room, and hold gratitude for everyone who came to share these four days. https://t.co/mhslsePMWL

    30310815.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20262.9x their median

    Your journey has its own timing. Your gifts have their own expression. Spend less time comparing your path to someone else’s and more time nurturing what’s already within you. You don’t have to compete to shine. Just keep growing and bloom. 🌸 https://t.co/LReba7gpu3

    20841764.1K viewsView on X
  • Jan 9, 20262.6x their median

    The answer to digital overwhelm isn't more technology, it's awakening what's already within you. If you're feeling overwhelmed by the pace of technological change, I have a message of hope for you. The Pure Human paperback is now available for pre-order: https://t.co/Ffvrc03Adr https://t.co/cT7ZnMJePK

    1684122612K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20262.5x their median

    A little throwback to 1992! 😊 Standing at an unexcavated Temple of Hathor, holding a book featuring my photo of an ancient artifact, right beside the artifact itself. More than 30 years later, the mysteries still inspire me, and the curiosity hasn’t faded. https://t.co/nAOLbCskn6

    191131835.4K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20262.0x their median

    The free global premiere of ILLUSION is happening now through July 26. I'm honored to be part of this film exploring science, consciousness, ancient wisdom, and the nature of reality. I hope you'll join me. Watch free: https://t.co/jtaDAYBPuN https://t.co/LgqPFtxYKW

    135311256.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20262.0x their median

    Our first dinner in Tampa Bay with producer Elan Cohen and Executive Director Lauri Wilmot! After all the planning, it’s wonderful to finally be here. We’re excited to welcome our community and begin four incredible days together at Pure Human: Breakthrough! https://t.co/xaY1mTpvKj

    16161104.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20261.7x their median

    What if humanity was intentionally created? Ancient texts, Sumerian records, and Indigenous traditions may preserve clues to a truth that could transform everything we believe about our origins. ▶️ Watch my new episode from Season 34 on Gaia: https://t.co/Q4Q7JDAlWK https://t.co/Z4SCdiTbTQ

    123161003.9K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 2026

    Within us are capacities for intuition, resilience, compassion, and deep knowing. Perhaps the journey isn't about becoming more; it's about remembering what it means to be Pure Human: https://t.co/rCrUiI2bRn https://t.co/0VmWTMtk8i

    9322614.0K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 2026

    Sometimes the greatest transformation doesn't come from becoming someone new. It comes from remembering who you've been all along. Beneath the noise, the expectations, and the distractions, your true nature has never left you. https://t.co/zldJb9RPoZ

    9116943.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 90 interactions against 143K followers, an engagement rate of 0.063%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.7K times each, and 3.33% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.89% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 530 interactions, about 5.9x its own typical post.

What is Gregg Braden's engagement rate on X?
Gregg Braden (@GreggBraden) has an engagement rate of 0.063%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 143,259 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.063%, Gregg Braden sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @GreggBraden have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @GreggBraden post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going