Greg Berge engagement report
@GregBerge - 58K followers on X
Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 47 interactions against 58K followers, an engagement rate of 0.081%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.9K times each, and 1.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.74% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video, 37% are part of a thread and 37% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.0K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.
Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Greg Berge's engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 42% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.081%, Greg Berge sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,381 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.147% |
| 75th percentile | 0.699% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 67% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 37% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 67% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 37% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 375 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 3, 202622x their median
P.J. Fleck’s entire 5-minute opening statement after knocking off Michigan. Well worth the listen. 👇 https://t.co/7K1Ss5cYJz
- Oct 4, 20264.9x their median
This is how I always viewed coaching. Every season is different. Different players. Different strengths. Different challenges. My job wasn’t to force every team to look the same. My job was to get the absolute most out of the team and talent we had. For me, that came down to three things: 1. Build the culture. 2. Develop leaders. 3. Find the strategy that gives THIS team the best chance to win. You don’t coach the team you wish you had. You coach the team you have. Great coaching is figuring out what your team can become, and then helping them get there. https://t.co/VXB8z5LbhV
- Oct 3, 20264.7x their median
One of my favorite lessons from Culture WINS: The 80-8 Rule. Only two people you really need to impress: • The 8-year-old you • The 80-year-old you Would the first be excited about your life? Would the second be proud of how you lived it? Amazon: https://t.co/tBhsTscGjY https://t.co/c2wLbDN4Xy
- Oct 2, 20264.7x their median
I love this from Ben McCollum. Culture starts with people. Energy-givers. Team-first players. Competitors. People who make everyone around them better. Get enough first-place people in the room, and you can build something special. https://t.co/P4vbAKKs8T
- Oct 1, 20263.5x their median
Culture doesn’t change all at once. It moves one choice at a time. Ownership or excuses. Effort or checking out. Communication or blame. Team-first or ego. Every choice moves your culture. Choose above-the-line behaviors.
- Oct 2, 20263.2x their median
Sean McVay said, “Winning is a habit; let’s make it ours.” I love that. Winning isn’t just game day. It’s how you prepare, respond, compete, and show up every day. So what habits make winning possible? Here are the 6 Habits of Winners. 1. Keep Stacking Days Winners show up every day. It’s not about going all out once in a while but consistency. Small, daily actions compound over time. Whether in the gym, the classroom, or your mindset, showing up EVERY DAY beats sporadic intensity. 2. Focus on the Process, Not Just the Results Winners don’t obsess over outcomes; they focus on the steps that get them there. The journey is where growth happens. By locking in on the process, they make success inevitable by constantly improving what they can control. 3. Embrace the Struggle Winners don’t shy away from challenges or discomfort. They know that growth happens in the tough moments. When others quit or back down, winners lean in. They understand that pain and struggle are part of the path to greatness. 4. Adapt and Adjust Winners are flexible. They don’t stick to a rigid plan when things change - they adapt. Whether it’s a new strategy, an unexpected challenge, or setbacks, winners adjust and keep moving forward. 5. Stay Humble and Hungry No matter how much success they’ve had, winners never think they’ve “arrived.” They remain humble, knowing there’s always room to improve. And they stay hungry, constantly pushing themselves to improve, no matter how much they’ve already achieved. 6. Mental Toughness Winners build mental resilience. They don’t let failures define them or allow external pressures to control their mindset. They train their minds as much as their bodies, learning to stay focused, calm, and confident in any situation. _____ If you like this post, you will love my free weekly newsletter. Great Teams Better Leaders Join 15,000+ others who read for free each week. The subscription link is in my profile.
- Sep 29, 20262.6x their median
Nick Saban is the GOAT for a reason. He never chased trophies. Never coached to be liked. Never let adversity define his teams. Never tolerated mediocrity. He obsessed over one thing: How we’re going to do it. That’s coaching 🥇. What’s a standard you will not bend?👇 https://t.co/z5O5RrfuwP
- Oct 4, 20262.0x their median
No Deposit. No Return. One of the first lessons I ever taught my teams. Want the return? You have to make the deposit first. Time. Effort. Preparation. Sacrifice. Everything is earned. It’s Lesson #1 in Culture WINS. 🏆 Find it on Amazon: https://t.co/8HkbixVOg1
- Oct 2, 20261.7x their median
Great coaches aren’t defined by wins. They’re defined by what they build. Standards. Relationships. Leaders. Which trait matters most right now? https://t.co/blYqlknX2m
- Sep 30, 20261.6x their median
Your team doesn't need certainty. They need confidence. Coach K had doubts in 1992. Never showed it. That's leadership. Coaches: What's harder... hiding doubt or admitting it? 👇 https://t.co/tR1M2Yl2ZB
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 47 interactions against 58K followers, an engagement rate of 0.081%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.9K times each, and 1.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.74% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video, 37% are part of a thread and 37% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.0K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.
- What is Greg Berge's engagement rate on X?
- Greg Berge (@GregBerge) has an engagement rate of 0.081%, based on the median interactions across 27 original posts from the last 30 days against 57,857 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.081%, Greg Berge sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,381 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @GregBerge have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @GregBerge post?
- Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.27 posts per day across the measured window.