Back to @Grayscale's profile

Grayscale engagement report

@Grayscale - 680K followers on X

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.028%
of 680K followers
Per impression
0.757%
25K views on a typical post
Reach
3.69%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
190
interactions (median)
Saved
0.058%
14 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.6/day
active 83% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 190 interactions against 680K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 0.757% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.70% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 81% carry an image or video, 19% are part of a thread and 65% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 8.1x its own typical post.

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Grayscale's engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 40% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.028%, Grayscale sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,583 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video81% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link65% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 81% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 65% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 385 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 25, 20268.1x their median

    Cash is private money Bitcoin is digital money Zcash is both $ZEC

    1.1K15323333102K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20267.8x their median

    Today, the Senate did not advance the CLARITY Act to formal debate. While this was not the outcome we hoped for, the industry continues to make remarkable progress through the ongoing work of regulators like the SEC and CFTC. Grayscale remains committed to advancing clear, comprehensive rules for digital assets and we will continue to work constructively with policymakers and regulators so that U.S. crypto policy will continue to mature.

    1.3K16648560K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20267.4x their median

    Crypto knows about Hyperliquid. Wall St knows about Hyperliquid. The President of the United States knows about Hyperliquid. Hyperliquid. https://t.co/Z32cpaueNn

    1.2K166472874K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20266.6x their median

    Every quarter, we update the components of our multi-asset funds: • Grayscale Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Fund $UNI, $ONDO, $AAVE $ENA, $CRV, $LDO • Grayscale Smart Contract Fund $BNB, $ETH, $SOL, $ADA, $HBAR, $AVAX, $SUI • Grayscale Decentralized AI Fund $NEAR, $TAO, $RENDER, $FIL Read on for our Q2 2026 fund updates 🧵⬇️

    9301801262186K viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 20266.0x their median

    In 2013, @Ripple was just a payments company. Today it spans custody, payments, native stablecoins, treasury management, and prime brokerage, all under one roof. @_JackMcDonald_, SVP at Ripple, joins Grayscale to discuss how the company is building full-stack financial infrastructure.

    856235382097K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20265.2x their median

    👀 @ZcashETF

    8594668750K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20264.7x their median

    Multiple chains are powering tokenization in different ways. $ETH → Home to the largest RWA market $SOL → Home to @xStocksFi $LINK → Powering @The_DTCC $AVAX → Powering Apollo's tokenized credit https://t.co/BqvZ7doINL

    655144681949K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20264.6x their median

    Assets with digital currency use case: $XRP, $LTC, $BTC, and $ZEC. Zcash has continued to capture market share, going from ~0.1% of Bitcoin's market cap a year ago ($ZEC price: ~$60) to ~1.5% today ($ZEC price: ~$1,500). As demand for privacy grows, Grayscale Research believes Zcash can keep capturing market share. Read more on The Stack: https://t.co/ofxV3Gm3wH

    6811027028100K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20264.4x their median

    Ethereum $ETH and Solana $SOL could be getting scarcer. New proposals on both networks aim to burn more tokens and cut inflation, reducing future supply. If they pass, annual inflation for ETH and SOL could fall below gold (1.8%) and U.S. CPI (3.3%) by 2031. More on protocol tokenomics on The Stack: https://t.co/bzEUxNpqyU

    650119591351K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20264.4x their median

    On September 15, the Senate votes to advance the CLARITY Act. Grayscale Research believes meaningful crypto regulation will move forward regardless of its outcome. US policymakers are already building clearer frameworks for stablecoins, token issuance, tokenized securities, and perpetual futures, with platforms like @Kalshi, @coinbase, and potentially @HyperliquidX. Read more on CLARITY: https://t.co/zf8S8iyjip

    67612629633K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 190 interactions against 680K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 0.757% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.70% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 81% carry an image or video, 19% are part of a thread and 65% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 8.1x its own typical post.

What is Grayscale's engagement rate on X?
Grayscale (@Grayscale) has an engagement rate of 0.028%, based on the median interactions across 26 original posts from the last 30 days against 680,419 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.028%, Grayscale sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Grayscale have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Grayscale post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going