Back to @Grand_AiHub's profile

Grand AI Hub engagement report

@Grand_AiHub - 86K followers on X

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.341%
of 86K followers
Per impression
0.706%
42K views on a typical post
Reach
48.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
298
interactions (median)
Saved
0.014%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.3/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Thursday

Early reading. We have captured 6 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 298 interactions against 86K followers, an engagement rate of 0.341%. Posts are seen about 42K times each, and 0.706% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 49.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 17% are part of a thread and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.4K interactions, about 4.7x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.341%, Grand AI Hub sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,475 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link50% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 50% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 527 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 4, 20264.7x their median

    Today, we’re releasing the open weights for Ling-3.0-flash. 🎉 Official BF16 and FP8-quantized versions are now available, so you can choose the option that best fits your hardware, performance requirements, and deployment needs. https://t.co/o2eQRZdupH

    1.1K1387777823K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20261.9x their median

    Ling-3.0-tiny is now available as an open-weight model in BF16, FP8 and INT4. On Artificial Analysis, it scores 25 on the Intelligence Index and 16 on the Agentic Index, with 772 Elo on GDPval-AA v2 and 20.80 on τ³-Banking—built for real task execution. 🧵 https://t.co/fPza3OXlNK

    438583340339K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 2026

    Gauth AI Courses are now available on the web AND in the app. Cinematic, visually engaging courses make learning more effective. ✅AI Tutor provides deeper explanations ✅Quizzes strengthen retention through active recall Explore more courses: https://t.co/YFNfW1ggSd https://t.co/nAOFhCqVAn

    39013284872K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026

    AI workflows are getting more complex, but accessing the models you need doesn’t have to be. https://t.co/KBj5zGpRDf brings 50+ leading AI models through one OpenAI-compatible API — with the same models available at often 30–70% below official list pricing. Just change your base URL and API key, keep your existing stack, and start saving on every call. One connection. Multiple models. Lower costs.

    19319811040K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 2026

    A1 is making live avatars hard to keep up with. Literally. My hiking buddy challenged me to a race and sprinted off down the trail without me. That’s a different league of character interaction. He spins all the way around to check the view behind us and jumps so hard he scares off a squirrel, while his water bottle stays the same bottle through every step, turn, and jump. All of this happens in real time as we talk. I told him to look at the clouds. He said they looked like giant marshmallows, then started panicking that it might rain. I can cut him off mid-sentence or change the plan whenever I want. Apparently, he can change the plan too. I thought we were hiking, not racing. Next I want a camping ghost that tells stories back. Think you can keep up with him? Meet him in the @VivixLabs_HQ Playground. 👇

    2873322544K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 2026

    I recently came across @Yori and honestly, this is a pretty interesting use of AI in healthcare. You can ask health-related questions and get personalized information instead of spending hours searching through random websites. What I liked is that it also helps you keep track of symptoms and questions you may want to discuss with a doctor. If you’re curious about AI + healthcare, give it a look 👇 🌐 https://t.co/cKuTCcUp5u #HealthAI #DigitalHealth #Yori

    15715910029K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026

    Goldmine for AI Agent Engineers! 📌 If you're learning AI Agent Engineering, then bookmark this repo right now. https://t.co/9bycIaw9L0 https://t.co/0GCfGwJXMZ

    18750132034K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026

    There’s a difference between regenerating a video and actually editing one. Regeneration asks: “What if I try again?” Editing asks: “What exactly should change?” That’s why this workflow makes sense to me. GPT Image 2.5 is coming to CapCut, available through Design Studio and AI Image. Start by turning the idea into a visual storyboard. Then use AI Video with Seedance 2.5 in CapCut PC’s multi-track timeline to generate the full video. Once you have footage, AI Edit lets you make targeted changes instead of throwing away the entire result. The more AI video improves, the more important that distinction becomes. Generation creates possibilities. Editing creates decisions. #GPTImage25 #CapCutPC #AIVideo #Seedance25

    12712712098K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 2026

    Introduce YouArt UGC Studio on YouArt MCP. 1000x your AI UGC Productivity. https://t.co/2hJWCLPhT5

    10232524256K viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 2026

    USD $10,000 Prize Pool GAIC Season 2 is here.🚀 Create a 1–3 minute fan-made AI commercial for a brand you love with Ima Studio. Creative Directions 🎬 Real Brand Concept Ad 🌌 Future Brand Ad 🏪 Local / Indie Brand AI Ad Submission Details: Deadline: August 10, 2026 Required Materials: Video + Pitch Deck explaining your creative approach and tools AI Usage: ≥60%, the main screen must be created using Ima Studio Participation: Solo or teams of up to 2 members, open to students and professionals Turn your bold idea into an AI-native commercial. Supported by Polymeric Cloud × @googlecloud Submit here 👉 https://t.co/3TVmpMN5vj Create with Ima Studio 👉 https://t.co/GZ5E7mEeKM #GAICSeason2 #ImaStudio #PolymericCloud #GoogleCloud #AICommercial #AIVideo #AIAdvertising #AIFilmmaking

    12522493060K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 298 interactions against 86K followers, an engagement rate of 0.341%. Posts are seen about 42K times each, and 0.706% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 49.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 17% are part of a thread and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.4K interactions, about 4.7x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Grand AI Hub's engagement rate on X?
Grand AI Hub (@Grand_AiHub) has an engagement rate of 0.341%, based on the median interactions across 6 original posts from the last 30 days against 85,827 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.341%, Grand AI Hub sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Grand_AiHub have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @Grand_AiHub post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going