Back to @GrahamAllen's profile

Graham Allen engagement report

@GrahamAllen - 566K followers on X

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.382%
of 566K followers
Per impression
11.2%
19K views on a typical post
Reach
3.40%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.093%
18 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 2.2K interactions against 566K followers, an engagement rate of 0.382%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 11.2% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.41% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 37K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Graham Allen's engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 99% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.382%, Graham Allen sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video78% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 78% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 172 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 30, 202617x their median

    We are just TWELVE DAYS out till the 25th anniversary of 9/11, and New York Governor Kathy Hochul is wearing a hijab. SHAME ON HER. https://t.co/KoChfjmKI1

    26K7.7K2.6K628268K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 202613x their median

    This man is a BEAST!!! NFL rookie Landon Robinson showed up to the game wearing a custom bomber jacket honoring Army pilots who died in a helicopter crash in 2025… EVERY FOOTBALL PLAYER CAN TAKE A LESSON!!! https://t.co/tm7eJqWkxC

    26K2.7K13432294K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202611x their median

    How beautiful is this!!! A bronze statue of Charlie Kirk has been unveiled outside of Turning Point USA headquarters… Charlie's legacy will live on forever. https://t.co/nBAjdppb02

    20K2.5K2433589K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20269.8x their median

    The RNC in Dallas saved a seat for Charlie Kirk… Charlie should be here for this historic event… his presence is truly missed. https://t.co/ss3kisSiqF

    18K2.4K54180117K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20266.1x their median

    Pray for Erika Kirk, Her and Charlie’s children, and the rest of their family today! Evil demons are lined up outside the courthouse to cheer on his murderer. Pray for JUSTICE for Charlie!

    11K1.2K64150120K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20265.8x their median

    This is LEGENDARY… Jason Aldean and Luke Bryan have made an appearance at the White House Press briefing room. https://t.co/syjYt5cbMt

    11K1.2K10815150K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20264.2x their median

    This is what REAL LEADERS look like. Secretary Hegseth and Chairman Caine stood in the cold rain to honor the nearly 3,000 Americans murdered on September 11, 2001. GOD BE WITH THESE LEADERS. https://t.co/gh9L1jNtTp

    8.0K1.1K38732K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20264.1x their median

    LINDSAY CLANCY IS A MURDERER!

    8.1K647711240K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20264.0x their median

    Isn’t it funny that when Pete Hegseth does PT with the troops… The overweight trannie left attacks him for it, but the actual warriors love it…

    8.2K40844442K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 20263.9x their median

    BOOO!! KID ROCK SAID THE TRUTH!!! "We are not, and we will never be, 'One Nation Under Mohammed' — because we are, and we always will be, ONE NATION UNDER GOD!" https://t.co/Pn3e5NB8ZB

    7.4K926601562K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.2K interactions against 566K followers, an engagement rate of 0.382%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 11.2% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.41% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 37K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

What is Graham Allen's engagement rate on X?
Graham Allen (@GrahamAllen) has an engagement rate of 0.382%, based on the median interactions across 37 original posts from the last 30 days against 565,551 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.382%, Graham Allen sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @GrahamAllen have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @GrahamAllen post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going