Back to @GotPickup's profile

Got Pickup? Gary PUA • situationship strategist engagement report

@GotPickup - 78K followers on X

Measured over 51 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.043%
of 78K followers
Per impression
1.28%
2.7K views on a typical post
Reach
3.40%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
34
interactions (median)
Saved
0.301%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 34 interactions against 78K followers, an engagement rate of 0.043%. Measured over 51 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.7K times each, and 1.28% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.40% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 51 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 36x its own typical post.

Measured over 51 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Got Pickup? Gary PUA • situationship strategist's engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 48% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.043%, Got Pickup? Gary PUA • situationship strategist sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video90% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 90% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 255 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Feb 9, 202136x their median

    His fence game too strong! Always have a better response than the other guys. https://t.co/9r8vJasw4z https://t.co/8Lwyu4k7bk

    1.0K1903215View on X
  • Aug 26, 202611x their median

    Great skills + Bad environment = dead in the water Average skills + Great environment = ridiculous success

    33220917.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20268.3x their median

    Before you shit on Asshole Game. Buy her flowers, open doors, pay for dinners and see how that works for you first.

    26111828.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20264.0x their median

    When you’re not attracted to a chick, it’s so easy to toy with her, tease her and get her to chase, why? Because you’re outcome indifferent and she senses it. You don’t care what she does, so she sees you as higher value. Train your brain to treat 9s like 5s for the win! https://t.co/TyedowBSyd

    1295013.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20263.5x their median

    One way to avoid the friend zone is by friendzoning her first. Tell her it's too bad she's not your type but you think she's adorable. Many times she’ll fight the false disqualification, just to prove to her ego that she’s still got it. https://t.co/OTUmILZhfM

    1105503.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20263.3x their median

    A 24 yr old dude at a bar told me he was getting married. He was tired of the dating scene and all of the entitled bitches with attitude. He said his fiancé had cheated on him twice, but he had been man enough to forgive her. When asked, he thought redpill meant republican. 🤦🏻‍♂️

    1061426.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20263.0x their median

    Women will tell you the reason men date younger women is because… • they’re emotionally immature • they prefer someone naïve they can control • they can’t handle the sophistication of an older woman • they’re losers with Peter Pan syndrome Everything but the obvious. https://t.co/bozOm0BimJ

    925225.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.0x their median

    Girls, making you believe they’re clueless, when they’re far more calculating than you could ever be, is part of their game. https://t.co/Q5BqhD3L0v

    643002.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20261.8x their median

    Make a girl obsessed w/you. 1) Be intermittent/unpredictable in your communication 2) Diminish her source of pride/accomplishments 3) Make her feel special by explicitly stating how you “don’t usually do this for anyone” 4) Affirm her fears/dreams 5) Feign narcissism Toxic? https://t.co/a5NXmjpg1k

    602002.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20261.8x their median

    Why are women repelled by nice guys? The ick of kindness comes from an allergic reaction to warmheartedness that in the past betrayed her. She doesn’t love herself, so why would a stranger? His kindness has an ulterior motive, he must be a needy loser. Bitch shield activated. https://t.co/1RkCxWcQcL

    582102.6K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 34 interactions against 78K followers, an engagement rate of 0.043%. Measured over 51 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.7K times each, and 1.28% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.40% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 51 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 36x its own typical post.

What is Got Pickup? Gary PUA • situationship strategist's engagement rate on X?
Got Pickup? Gary PUA • situationship strategist (@GotPickup) has an engagement rate of 0.043%, based on the median interactions across 51 original posts from the last 30 days against 78,231 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.043%, Got Pickup? Gary PUA • situationship strategist sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @GotPickup have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @GotPickup post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going