Back to @GoogleStartups's profile

Google for Startups engagement report

@GoogleStartups - 256K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.021%
of 256K followers
Per impression
1.01%
5.3K views on a typical post
Reach
2.05%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
53
interactions (median)
Saved
0.209%
11 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.67/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 53 interactions against 256K followers, an engagement rate of 0.021%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 33% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.3K times each, and 1.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.05% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 88% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 373 interactions, about 7.0x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ruggedize, #startupdayfrance.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #ruggedize, #startupdayfrance.

Compared with accounts its own size

Google for Startups's engagement rate beats 33% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 43% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.021%, Google for Startups sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video88% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link88% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 88% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 317 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 13, 20267.0x their median

    introducing Motion V2, the frontier AI for motion design. this launch video was made entirely with Motion V2. 👇🏽 repost + comment "MOTION" for free credits. tag @motion_so in any post on your X feed for a surprise. here’s how it works + what's changed:

    196469437145K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20265.4x their median

    Master the Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform and Google Antigravity 2.0 in our new four-part series: Startup School: Agent Builder. Move past "sandboxed" AI. Build a production-grade multi-agent co-founder suite using the Agent Development Kit. 🛠️ The Stack: 🔹 Long-term state management 🔹 Multimodal RAG (AlloyDB) 🔹 Provisioned throughput (no 429s) 🔹 SPIFFE-based agent identities Eliminate infrastructure drag and ship smarter. ⤵️ https://t.co/SJa2XimJrC

    2333512414K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20264.9x their median

    Calling the next generation of healthtech leaders! 📣 Startup School: HealthTech is here to help you reach your highest impact potential. Join us for a customizable five-part series exploring the future of healthcare with industry leaders from @NVIDIA, @GoogleCloud, @FlareCapital, and Pamir Ventures. Register now: https://t.co/Q8f6rUYUef

    217318345K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20262.8x their median

    You don't need a coding background to build your app–just use everyday language. 🚀 @Google has launched a new course on vibe coding in the Google AI Professional Certificate. Start building today: https://t.co/7aXdRMIcN4 Bonus: Enroll today and you’ll also get 3 months of Google AI Pro at no cost (terms apply). 😉 #GrowWithGoogle

    116181609.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20262.5x their median

    EMEA founders: ready to scale? 🚀 Google for Startups Immersion, powered by @AntlerGlobal, connects startups with product experts, founders & investors across two phases. Apply by Oct. 13: https://t.co/eCWSnze3a6 https://t.co/ddI8ivQayE

    11020119.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20262.3x their median

    The next generation of unicorns won't be defined by team size. They'll be defined by what they build. ⚙️🦄 That's why Google for Startups and @NVIDIA are partnering to help AI-native founders access the infrastructure behind today's most advanced AI applications. With NVIDIA-accelerated computing on @GoogleCloud, startups can train, deploy, and scale everything from generative AI to agentic systems faster and more efficiently. Start building: https://t.co/T9SFdrCfXX

    94131608.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20262.2x their median

    Big news! The inaugural Asia-Pacific cohort of our Google DeepMind Accelerator: AI for the Planet is here. 🎉 Over the next three months, 16 teams are building alongside experts from Google to turn frontier AI into real-world climate solutions. Read the full announcement here: https://t.co/0AmNnWdl3W

    9914426.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20261.8x their median

    The official SF + LA Tech Week Calendar is LIVE! Over 2,300 events, most free to attend. Apply now before they fill up! https://t.co/VlkCNIa6v0 https://t.co/2L64KWx1fG

    65158926K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    When it comes to generative media, it’s no longer enough to build a cool, standalone image or video generation app. 🎥 To succeed, startups need to build context-aware agentic workflows that deliver consistent media at scale. Our new Startup technical guide: Generative media shows you how: https://t.co/BvZCEwTHBC

    478228.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2026

    🌾 What happens when AI meets agriculture? At @reservoirfarms inaugural #Ruggedize event, @bonsairobotics, @HippoAg, and Orchard AI showed how they’re using @GoogleCloud’s AI stack to tackle crop health, weather, sustainability, and labor shortages. See what they’re building: https://t.co/t3qKp2yGFq

    456505.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ruggedize#startupdayfrance

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 53 interactions against 256K followers, an engagement rate of 0.021%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 33% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.3K times each, and 1.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.05% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 88% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 373 interactions, about 7.0x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ruggedize, #startupdayfrance.

What is Google for Startups's engagement rate on X?
Google for Startups (@GoogleStartups) has an engagement rate of 0.021%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 255,915 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.021%, Google for Startups sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @GoogleStartups have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 33% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @GoogleStartups post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going