Google for Startups engagement report
@GoogleStartups - 255K followers on X
Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 40 interactions against 255K followers, an engagement rate of 0.016%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.4K times each, and 0.913% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.72% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 52% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 373 interactions, about 9.3x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #startupsummit, #startupdayfrance.
Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026. Recurring tags: #startupsummit, #startupdayfrance.
Compared with accounts its own size
Google for Startups's engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 44% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.016%, Google for Startups sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.499% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 119.6% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 96% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 52% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 96% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 52% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 319 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 13, 20269.3x their median
introducing Motion V2, the frontier AI for motion design. this launch video was made entirely with Motion V2. 👇🏽 repost + comment "MOTION" for free credits. tag @motion_so in any post on your X feed for a surprise. here’s how it works + what's changed:
- Aug 11, 20263.8x their median
You don't need a coding background to build your app–just use everyday language. 🚀 @Google has launched a new course on vibe coding in the Google AI Professional Certificate. Start building today: https://t.co/7aXdRMIcN4 Bonus: Enroll today and you’ll also get 3 months of Google AI Pro at no cost (terms apply). 😉 #GrowWithGoogle
- Aug 12, 20263.1x their median
The next generation of unicorns won't be defined by team size. They'll be defined by what they build. ⚙️🦄 That's why Google for Startups and @NVIDIA are partnering to help AI-native founders access the infrastructure behind today's most advanced AI applications. With NVIDIA-accelerated computing on @GoogleCloud, startups can train, deploy, and scale everything from generative AI to agentic systems faster and more efficiently. Start building: https://t.co/T9SFdrCfXX
- Aug 24, 2026
When it comes to generative media, it’s no longer enough to build a cool, standalone image or video generation app. 🎥 To succeed, startups need to build context-aware agentic workflows that deliver consistent media at scale. Our new Startup technical guide: Generative media shows you how: https://t.co/BvZCEwTHBC
- Aug 26, 2026
The biggest breakthroughs can start with the most skepticism. ⚡️🤨 @DemisHassabis, cofounder of @GoogleDeepMind, remembers when AI was dismissed as a niche field that “didn’t work.” At @YCombinator x Google DeepMind Startups Day, he shared why going deep can lead to lasting impact. Watch the full conversation with @GarryTan now: https://t.co/fUcIkz0fQB
- Sep 1, 2026
Voicify is turning restaurant calls into seamless AI-powered orders. 📞⚡️ With @GeminiApp and @GoogleCloud, the team cut onboarding from one to two weeks to one to two days, while improving the speed and reliability of its AI voice assistants at scale. Explore the Voicify blueprint: https://t.co/w70JKvufku
- Aug 28, 2026
Every founder has a go-to. ⚙️✨ At the recent Gemini Startup Forum, Stephan Bitton asked founders to share their favorite @Google AI tools—from @GeminiApp and Gemini Live to tools for coding, deep research, @GoogleWorkspace, and more. What’s your preferred Google AI tool? Let us know in the comments! 👇
- Aug 27, 2026
AI is a generational opportunity to redesign the global energy system. ⚡ Meet 28 startups across North America and Europe joining the Google for Startups Accelerator. From modernizing the grid to cutting power bills, they’re building the foundation for clean, reliable power for everyone. Start fast. Scale faster. 🌍 https://t.co/i4Sb0nqrHi
- Aug 21, 2026
From agent infrastructure and developer tools to healthcare, energy, and enterprise AI, these 10 startups are building the technologies defining what's next. 👉 https://t.co/7htFOwigiK
- Aug 14, 2026
Data is becoming a competitive advantage for Europe's AI startups. 🌍💽 @Ockenfels (@b2venture), Hendryk Hosemann (High-Tech Gründerfonds), and @TimRehder (General Partner at @EarlybirdVC) share why data sovereignty, hosting, and infrastructure are evolving from technical decisions into core business strategy. Which matters more? 🔒 Data sovereignty ⚡ Faster commercialization
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 40 interactions against 255K followers, an engagement rate of 0.016%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.4K times each, and 0.913% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.72% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 52% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 373 interactions, about 9.3x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #startupsummit, #startupdayfrance.
- What is Google for Startups's engagement rate on X?
- Google for Startups (@GoogleStartups) has an engagement rate of 0.016%, based on the median interactions across 27 original posts from the last 30 days against 255,225 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.016%, Google for Startups sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @GoogleStartups have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @GoogleStartups post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.57 posts per day across the measured window.