Back to @GoltubeTv's profile

GOLTUBE engagement report

@GoltubeTv - 331K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.013%
of 331K followers
Per impression
0.058%
74K views on a typical post
Reach
22.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
43
interactions (median)
Saved
0.003%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.8/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 43 interactions against 331K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 74K times each, and 0.058% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 22.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 112 interactions, about 2.6x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

GOLTUBE's engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 4% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.013%, GOLTUBE sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,691 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99118.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,691 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,485 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile118.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 87 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 6, 20262.6x their median

    💔O'nu bir daha Dünya Kupası’nda izleyemeyeceğiz. Cristiano Ronaldo🐐❤️ https://t.co/RiP81j2O8Q

    10831019K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 20262.5x their median

    🔥🔥FERRAN TORRES GOLDEN SONRA KÖŞE BAYRAĞINA "BU DA MI GOL DEĞİL" DERCESİNE TEKME ATTI. İSPANYA 106. DAKİKADA ÖNE GEÇTİ! https://t.co/WcEUW4Fsh9

    107000111K viewsView on X
  • Jul 3, 20262.1x their median

    🔥🔥Milan'ın yeni ikilisi sahnede. ⚽️Gol: Gonçalo Ramos 🎯Asist: Leao Portekiz, İspanya'nın rakibi olmak üzere! https://t.co/Ye4hTKi4Km

    9110030K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 20262.0x their median

    🇦🇷 ARJANTİN DÜNYA KUPASI'NDA ÜST ÜSTE İKİNCİ KEZ FİNALDE! FİNAL 19 TEMMUZ 🇦🇷ARJANTİN - İSPANYA 🇪🇸 https://t.co/ULLrbCrYMZ

    8310062K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20261.9x their median

    🗣️Uğur Meleke:" Fenerbahçe, Şampiyonlar Ligi'ne kalamazsa sorumlusu 60. dakikada sürekli Asensio'yu oyundan alan İsmail Kartal'dır!"

    6617959K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 20261.8x their median

    🗣️TRT spikeri: "Yola devam eden Messi ve Mısır oluyor:"

    7412040K viewsView on X
  • Jul 3, 20261.7x their median

    🐐Cristiano Ronaldo imza golüyle skoru eşitledi! https://t.co/tbgRui4le9

    7002118K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20261.6x their median

    🗣️Serdar Ali Çelikler: "Bu takım Lyon’a yenilir."

    6604059K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20261.6x their median

    🗣Evren Turhan:"Fenerbahçe iyi kadro kurdu. Bu maç İsmail Kartal'a yazar."

    6512080K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 20261.6x their median

    DÜNYA KUPASI'NIN EN ÇOK GOL ATAN OYUNCUSU. DÜNYA KUPASI'NIN EN ÇOK ASİST YAPAN OYUNCUSU. MESSİ, MISIR KARŞISINDA 1 GOL, 1 ASİST İLE ÜLKESİNİ SIRTLIYOR🔥🔥 https://t.co/cLKhMqFm6S

    6800025K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 43 interactions against 331K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 74K times each, and 0.058% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 22.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 112 interactions, about 2.6x its own typical post.

What is GOLTUBE's engagement rate on X?
GOLTUBE (@GoltubeTv) has an engagement rate of 0.013%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 331,329 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.013%, GOLTUBE sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,691 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @GoltubeTv have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @GoltubeTv post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going