Back to @Gls9554307's profile

还是瓜老师 engagement report

@Gls9554307 - 242K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.659%
of 242K followers
Per impression
1.56%
102K views on a typical post
Reach
42.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.6K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.544%
557 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.77/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 1.6K interactions against 242K followers, an engagement rate of 0.659%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 102K times each, and 1.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 42.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 6.6x its own typical post.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

还是瓜老师's engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 55% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.659%, 还是瓜老师 sits above the 75th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.499% to 2.09%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video88% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 60 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 28, 20266.6x their median

    65万粉丝抖音冷脸御姐清风皓月黑丝荷官5分钟定制视频完整版 https://t.co/ZTA1pgLMDL

    10.0K453341210K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20266.6x their median

    37万粉丝抖音魅魔御姐琳铛唯一漏点视频 https://t.co/Br6zCQPDRF

    9.9K4161021421K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20265.0x their median

    抖音反差御姐清风皓月1分48秒低胸睡衣定制视频 https://t.co/hYdhTFTSgI

    7.6K383180213K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20265.0x their median

    260万粉丝抖音网红清风皓月反差嫩妹3分41秒蕾丝内衣完整版 https://t.co/R79a8wzk7O

    7.5K351311254K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20264.5x their median

    254万粉丝抖音纯欲嫩妹喝多了想兔双女联动5分钟 https://t.co/aT8IWkOuAb

    6.9K234510230K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20263.9x their median

    抖音甜妹超蓝布罗莉反差服务员第二部 https://t.co/IEblQQqJdG

    5.9K226541133K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20263.1x their median

    黑皮辣妹黑润闰粉色猫咪 https://t.co/J7lzYf7QcQ

    4.7K21050183K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20262.5x their median

    网红沈汝凡,靠着水蛇腰配上夸张到犯规的匈围,硬是把性感与纯欲玩成了反差梗。结果深夜直播跳大尺度舞蹈,直接把平台底线跳穿,喜提永久封禁。看来,再清纯的脸也救不了太会扭的腰。 https://t.co/iNCw7teRzS

    3.8K135480204K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20262.4x their median

    顶级网红小狼崽,纯欲风天花板级别。清纯到极致的无辜面容,却同时散发出令人心跳加速的强烈反差魅力。那双又纯又欲的眼睛杀伤力爆表,勾魂摄魄,让人一眼便难以忘怀。 https://t.co/dA4QuMpXho

    3.7K119861180K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20262.3x their median

    顶级反差御姐、400万粉丝的现象级网红“小艾根本吃不饱”,凭借翘挺蜜桃臀、黄金比例身材和超长美腿,视觉冲击极强,性感指数拉满,令人目光无法移开。 https://t.co/9lkKx0CtFs

    3.5K137730166K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.6K interactions against 242K followers, an engagement rate of 0.659%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 102K times each, and 1.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 42.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 6.6x its own typical post.

What is 还是瓜老师's engagement rate on X?
还是瓜老师 (@Gls9554307) has an engagement rate of 0.659%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 241,682 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.659%, 还是瓜老师 sits above the 75th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Gls9554307 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Gls9554307 post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going