Back to @Global_Mil_Info's profile

GMI engagement report

@Global_Mil_Info - 340K followers on X

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.032%
of 340K followers
Per impression
0.644%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
4.89%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
107
interactions (median)
Saved
0.048%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.4/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 107 interactions against 340K followers, an engagement rate of 0.032%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.644% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.89% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.1K interactions, about 20x its own typical post.

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

GMI's engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 36% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.032%, GMI sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video77% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 77% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 506 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 4, 202620x their median

    It appears a mass withdrawal of B-1B Lancer bombers from RAF Fairford is underway, likely reflecting the ongoing security threat surrounding the airbase. The movement also appears to include aircraft from the most recent B-1B rotation, rather than being limited to the bombers already stationed at Fairford. Footage from @CraigYoungMedia.

    1.7K19113175890K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20269.4x their median

    Belarus launched balloons toward the Vilnius Airport area, in what Lithuanian authorities are describing as a hybrid attack. https://t.co/U7Etg3xn5o

    782183251247K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20264.9x their median

    Russia’s Kapotnya Oil Refinery in Moscow is on fire following an Ukrainian attack drone raid. The facility is considered one of the key sources of fuel for Moscow and Moscow Oblast. Any significant damage could further tighten local and regional fuel availability. https://t.co/5ID33ok0VX

    39910215553K viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 20263.2x their median

    Severe clashes are reportedly underway between the U.S. Navy and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy (IRGC-N) in the Strait of Hormuz.

    279548541K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20263.2x their median

    CIA Director John Ratcliffe spent only about 4-5 hours on the ground in Moscow before immediately returning to the United States, where he went to the White House for a meeting that included Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. John Caine. The timing is raising serious questions. Reports now indicate that U.S. air defense stockpiles in Europe are reaching critical levels, while Ratcliffe's trip was reportedly intended to warn Moscow against attacking NATO and privately brief U.S. officials on his assessment of Russia's position in the war. Putin is reportedly preparing to escalate the war in Ukraine in the coming months. While considered unlikely, some Russian officials are also said to fear the possibility of tactical nuclear weapons being used as a last resort. Taken together, there appear to be growing concerns inside Washington over a potential escalation involving either Ukraine or NATO.

    2894210345K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.9x their median

    CIA Director John Ratcliffe's Moscow visit is raising questions about whether Washington is delivering a direct warning over potential Russian escalation against Europe and NATO. The timing is notable, with growing Russian aggression across Europe involving increased drone activity and suspected GRU-linked sabotage operations. There’s a familiar precedent. In November 2021, CIA Director William Burns traveled to Moscow after U.S. intelligence uncovered Russia's plans to invade Ukraine, warning Putin directly about what Washington knew and the consequences.

    216582712415K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20262.7x their median

    A notable increase in security preparations is underway across Europe amid growing concerns over Russia’s hybrid campaign. Germany is preparing hospitals for a potential conflict, Lithuania has updated evacuation plans, NATO forces are conducting drills in the Baltic region, and Belarusian troops have held large-scale exercises near Lithuania. Polish PM Donald Tusk has warned that intelligence assessments indicate Russia could conduct hybrid drone and missile strikes against NATO countries supporting Ukraine, including Poland, potentially presenting any attacks as “accidents” to test NATO’s response. French President Emmanuel Macron has also ordered a new plan to protect critical infrastructure from potential Russian drone and cyber threats, describing the Russian hybrid threat as intensifying. While NATO officials have not characterized an attack as imminent, the combination of military exercises, civil-defense preparations and warnings from European governments highlights the growing concern surrounding Russia’s activities across the continent.

    231501630K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20262.3x their median

    The IDF has launched an operation tonight to destroy underground tunnels beneath the Ali Taher ridge in southern Lebanon. The move comes after Iran previously warned Israel against such action, prompting the IDF to raise its alert level. https://t.co/MDCTpDcOPU

    191416572K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20262.2x their median

    President Trump has cut short his weekend stay at Camp David. The early departure comes amid a flurry of new U.S. security alerts issued across the Middle East, with warnings of potential travel disruptions and airspace closures. The reason for the early departure has not yet been disclosed.

    1883114329K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20262.2x their median

    South Korea now assesses that a North Korean landmine was highly likely responsible for the recent DMZ explosion that injured three South Korean soldiers. If the finding is confirmed, Seoul says North Korea will bear full responsibility and that South Korea will take “appropriate, substantial and corresponding” measures.

    192403019K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 107 interactions against 340K followers, an engagement rate of 0.032%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.644% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.89% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.1K interactions, about 20x its own typical post.

What is GMI's engagement rate on X?
GMI (@Global_Mil_Info) has an engagement rate of 0.032%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 339,583 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.032%, GMI sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Global_Mil_Info have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Global_Mil_Info post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going