Back to @Global_Folder's profile

Global Folder engagement report

@Global_Folder - 892K followers on X

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.381%
of 892K followers
Per impression
0.321%
1.1M views on a typical post
Reach
118.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.4K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.025%
268 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.77/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 3.4K interactions against 892K followers, an engagement rate of 0.381%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 1.1M times each, and 0.321% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 118.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 198K interactions, about 58x its own typical post.

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Global Folder's engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 22% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.381%, Global Folder sits above the 50th percentile of the 206,421 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.681%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.681%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 206,421 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,259 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.681%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video77% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 77% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 316 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 19, 202658x their median

    たった1人で侵略者からアニメショップを守る フランスのオタク、マジでカッコ良すぎて泣いた https://t.co/lehhMSG0YH

    177K18K1.5K1.4K8.4M viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 202615x their median

    120 psi straight to the face 😭 https://t.co/a1dI5StuJW

    49K3.2K5282102.5M viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 202610.0x their median

    सऊदी अरब में बांग्लादेश के दंपति का सर कलम करके मौत की सजा देने के बाद उनके शव बांग्लादेश पहुंच गए जिसका अंतिम संस्कार कर दिया गया पता चल रहा है कि उन दोनों की एक 8 साल की बेटी भी है जो अब अनाथ हो गई और यह पति-पत्नी मक्का की एक मस्जिद में सेक्स नहीं कर रहे थे बल्कि एक दूसरे का चुंबन ले रहे थे रील बना रहे थे और उनके इसी “खतरनाक" गुनाह पर दोनों का तलवार से सर धड़ से अलग कर दिया गया सजा देते समय का भी वीडियो है क्योंकि सऊदी अरब में सार्वजनिक रूप से सजा दी जाती है लेकिन वह वीडियो इतना भयावह है कि मैं उसे पोस्ट नहीं कर सकता पहले पुरुष का सर काटा गया और उसका सर धड़ से अलग होकर कई घंटे तक छटपटाता रहा इधर-उधर हिलता रहा उसके बाद महिला का भी सर काट दिया गया और सबसे भयावह दृश्य तब था जब दोनों के सर उछलते उछलते एक दूसरे के करीब आ जाते थे जाहिद का लिखा हुआ एक शेर याद आ गया “जाहिद शराब पीने दे मस्जिद में बैठकर या फिर वो जगह बता दे जहां खुद नहीं है"

    25K4.8K3.5K7124.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20266.9x their median

    https://t.co/KdgtBORoOF

    20K3.3K202371426K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 20266.7x their median

    台灣高雄一名黑人男子在捷運上尿尿,這名黑人男子是民進黨引進的史瓦蒂尼人才,在台灣沒人敢動他。 https://t.co/OhoURDL17c

    17K4.6K1.3K4203.2M viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 20265.9x their median

    Who still remember this video 😂😂 https://t.co/Tg161TYUsA

    18K1.6K155671.1M viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 20264.0x their median

    Sind jetzt auf dem Weg zum Louvre. https://t.co/ZexhdSO9qN

    12K1.4K2842377.6M viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 20263.6x their median

    Two Filipino farmers attempt to settle land dispute through underwater endurance contest — BOTH DIE Men, 69 & 49, remained submerged for around 12 MINUTES before crowd realized they were dead 'Sulif' ritual is used to settle conflicts through a traditional test of endurance https://t.co/ArBsPVbehQ

    10K1.0K9413992.3M viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 20262.9x their median

    never skip a low quality video https://t.co/HuTz8jOkSG

    8.8K82016890651K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 2026

    Police in South Africa airlifted a crocodile suspected of eating a 59-year-old businessman after drones spotted it in the area where he went missing. Officers sh—t the animal and airlifted it out of the water. After c—tting it open, they discovered human remains believed to belong to Gabriel Batista. Batista was reportedly swept away by floodwaters on Monday while attempting to drive across a flooded bridge to reach his hotel and bar. Authorities found his ring inside the crocodile, along with six pairs of shoes that may belong to other victims. It remains unclear whether Batista was alive when the crocodile ate him. Police also suspect that other crocodiles may have consumed parts of his body.

    4.2K437209452.9M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.4K interactions against 892K followers, an engagement rate of 0.381%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 1.1M times each, and 0.321% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 118.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 198K interactions, about 58x its own typical post.

What is Global Folder's engagement rate on X?
Global Folder (@Global_Folder) has an engagement rate of 0.381%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 892,049 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.381%, Global Folder sits above the 50th percentile of the 206,421 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Global_Folder have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Global_Folder post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going