Back to @GlitchAce's profile

Ace Glitch engagement report

@GlitchAce - 205K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
9.04%
of 205K followers
Per impression
11.5%
158K views on a typical post
Reach
78.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
18K
interactions (median)
Saved
2.67%
4.2K bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.3/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 18K interactions against 205K followers, an engagement rate of 9.04%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 100% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 158K times each, and 11.5% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 77.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 118K interactions, about 6.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026. Recurring tag: #marvelrivalsㅤ.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ace Glitch's engagement rate beats 100% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 98% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 9.04%, Ace Glitch sits above the 90th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.55% to 82.4%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video78% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 78% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 62 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 6, 20266.5x their median

    Something is wrong with this Miku model https://t.co/3vYGxRZKkZ

    113K4.9K471431.6M viewsView on X
  • May 9, 20265.0x their median

    Miku on and off the clock https://t.co/wFWURci4OK

    88K3.4K8722856K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20263.7x their median

    The night is calling https://t.co/7o78XgvNeC

    64K3.0K25956586K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20263.3x their median

    Data size differences Miku https://t.co/Vgh55BHPeA

    57K2.5K14218470K viewsView on X
  • Jun 14, 20262.9x their median

    Lucy https://t.co/UKiNmHByAB

    51K2.3K12822630K viewsView on X
  • Jun 30, 20262.8x their median

    Popular character design tropes with Miku https://t.co/TxMzvcs1nT

    49K2.1K25035473K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20262.5x their median

    Jubilee supporting #MarvelRivalsㅤ https://t.co/76fNGKkSOf

    44K1.6K5313281K viewsView on X
  • Jul 8, 20262.4x their median

    Rent is high nowadays man https://t.co/9Pi4ZWB2y7

    42K1.6K8710347K viewsView on X
  • Jun 26, 20262.0x their median

    Mirko https://t.co/WhY4GyRtze

    36K1.5K708282K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20261.9x their median

    The Yandere Model is starting to mimic the others… https://t.co/Xa8zQdyhpG

    34K1.4K546344K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#marvelrivalsㅤ

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 18K interactions against 205K followers, an engagement rate of 9.04%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 100% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 158K times each, and 11.5% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 77.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 118K interactions, about 6.5x its own typical post.

What is Ace Glitch's engagement rate on X?
Ace Glitch (@GlitchAce) has an engagement rate of 9.04%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 205,337 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 9.04%, Ace Glitch sits above the 90th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @GlitchAce have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 100% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @GlitchAce post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going