Back to @Glinner's profile

Graham Linehan engagement report

@Glinner - 663K followers on X

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.095%
of 663K followers
Per impression
2.50%
25K views on a typical post
Reach
3.81%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
632
interactions (median)
Saved
0.158%
40 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.17/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 632 interactions against 663K followers, an engagement rate of 0.095%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 2.50% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.81% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video and 40% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.7K interactions, about 11x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nzshame, #theringsofpower.

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #nzshame, #theringsofpower.

Compared with accounts its own size

Graham Linehan's engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 76% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.095%, Graham Linehan sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.439%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99155.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,856 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 97,248 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile155.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 21, 202611x their median

    what is with this rise in transphobia why is everyone turning conservative we’re genuinely devolving

    5.7K66725785309K viewsView on X
  • Mar 22, 20239.3x their median

    Ah, yes, the Nazis, famously bigoted against straight white men with blonde hair https://t.co/eUDHamnHyH

    4.8K583398108900K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20265.2x their median

    🚨NEW Look at Durin IV, Disa and their children Gerda and Gamli in ‘The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power’ Season 3 via @screenrant #TheRingsOfPower https://t.co/vsdozxp62W

    2.1K1451039543.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20263.5x their median

    The creeping normalisation of behaviours that were once considered shameful continues apace. Ireland has crossed a new line though, with a national conference for lactation consultants hosting a man who specialises in helping men lactate for "curiosity, fun, or sexual gratification". If this is not the thing that wakes people up, what on earth will it be? Does it get much worse than this? Read and share: https://t.co/cib9eUll7C

    1.5K5397753225K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20263.3x their median

    So it transpires that the self-appointed defender of Jason Arday - who has been freely accusing other journalists of failing to undertake basic research before publication - is himself not conversant with widely-reported and important details of the case against him. Astonishing: https://t.co/mXELV4IQip

    1.9K12526498K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20263.1x their median

    do terfs actually do anything other than hating trans people, like they never actually fight for womens rights, from what I've seen they done the opposite.

    1.7K22543814K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20261.8x their median

    If you are gay, you are queer – and yes, it matters 🗣️ https://t.co/oQFc4XwwFx https://t.co/Ey8fFHwhNP

    11415824161245K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20261.6x their median

    It's crazy that this isn't satire.!!! https://t.co/oAvkednSBD

    765216401339K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    No such consensus as claimed by @nymagazine exists. As a PhD candidate in anthropology, I have extensively studied the intellectuals and intellectual frameworks used by the antizionist academics who have made the claim. Five hundred scholars and educators rejected the claim here and explained the complete failure of the genocide libel to meet international legal standards: https://t.co/r7qD3xzjWb As I wrote in @WSJ: "The genocide accusation against Israel has traveled far and wide since Oct. 7, but its intellectual sources have rarely been scrutinized. Every major iteration of the accusation, I learned, flows from an academic framework that presents the accusation of genocide in Gaza as a consequence of Israel being a “settler colonial” state founded by Europeans who don’t belong in the Middle East...That publication has been a proponent for changing, extending or rejecting the legal definition of genocide enshrined in the 1948 Genocide Convention, formulated by Jewish jurist Raphael Lemkin." https://t.co/9CW7ToELut

    49211616825K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    Jolyon Maugham is a nasty, pompous fool: https://t.co/phHWJgV4aA

    3833411020K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#nzshame#theringsofpower

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 632 interactions against 663K followers, an engagement rate of 0.095%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 2.50% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.81% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video and 40% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.7K interactions, about 11x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nzshame, #theringsofpower.

What is Graham Linehan's engagement rate on X?
Graham Linehan (@Glinner) has an engagement rate of 0.095%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 663,441 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.095%, Graham Linehan sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Glinner have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Glinner post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going