Back to @GlarungYedek's profile

Glarung engagement report

@GlarungYedek - 259K followers on X

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.06%
of 259K followers
Per impression
2.77%
99K views on a typical post
Reach
38.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.7K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.043%
43 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.47/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 2.7K interactions against 259K followers, an engagement rate of 1.06%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 99K times each, and 2.77% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 38.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.0K interactions, about 2.2x its own typical post.

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026. Recurring tag: #fileninsultanları.

Compared with accounts its own size

Glarung's engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 75% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.06%, Glarung sits above the 75th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.499% to 2.09%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video53% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link7% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 53% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 338 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 5, 20262.2x their median

    ❌ 26 hazirana 6 oyuncu hazır gelecek dedi, toplam 5 transfer yaptı Vedat dışında hiçbiri kampa yetişmedi. ❌ Yerli transfer sayısı artacak söz veriyorum dedi; yerli oyuncu transferi 0. ❌ Para sorunumuz yok yönetimimizi inceleyin çok güçlü geliyoruz dediler, pahalı buldukları için ihtiyaçlarımızı almadılar. ❌ Asensio’nun tek alternatifi olan Talisca’yı satıp yerine bile isteye adam almadılar. Türk veya U23 bile almadılar pahalı dediler. ❌ Hakemler, Fedarasyon bunlar en kolay iş dedi göreve geldikten sonra ligde yaşanan hiçbir hakem rezaletinin önüne geçemediler. ❌ Fenerbahçe’yi göz göre göre berbat beklere, yedekleri korkunç bir planlamaya mahkum ettiler. Taraftar transfer diye bas bas bağırırken ekrana çıkıp sırıtarak transferi kapattık dediler. Bir grup azınlık, menfaat bekleyen yalakalar burada transfer isteyenleri hain ilan etti. Şimdi doya doya sırıtmaya devam edin. Bu sonuç senin eserin yönetim.

    4.9K83524946191K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 2026

    FENER. https://t.co/0yGia6Jvvb

    3.8K14414257K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 2026

    hazır bu saatte menfaatçi artniyetli tayfa uyumuştur hızlıca içimizi dökelim, adamlar tarihin en güçlü yönetimi çok paramız var yaparsak biz yaparız öbürleri yalancı oy vermeyin dediler şimdi çıkmışlar bu piyasaya ne olmuş böyle u23 çok pahalı nerede eski bayramlar nerede eski piyasa diye açıklama yapıyorlar. E hani sen cebinden vermeye gelmiştin hani çocuklar ağlamasın istiyordun. 23 yaş altı oyuncular tarihte hep pahalı olmuştur şimdi daha pahalı buna şaşırmak nedir ya ? Cebinden 250m€ yakmayı göze almış adamı seçmeyip, iyi puro yakıyor kurtlar vadisi editi var diye hiçbir plan programı olmayan eski topçudan sportif direktör yapan yolu seçtik akıl alır gibi değil. Bir de insanlara hakaretler edip, foncu diye iftira attılar. Kendileri nasıl bir beklenti ile savunuyorlar yönetimi koca bir soru işareti.

    3.1K2601561297K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 2026

    Yaş filan demeden istisnasız her maçın en iyisi oluyor istisnasız her maçın en çok basan en çok koşan adamı oluyor. Yarısı kadar mücadele etmeyenler, sahada yürüyenler utansın. https://t.co/Ou1HTnSRS1

    3.3K8276157K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    https://t.co/k71nNAGJGX

    2.9K14421660438K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026

    Güncel olarak Fenerbahçe’nin açık ara en sevilen futbolcusu. Takım iyi de gitse, kötü de gitse bir kişi hiç değişmiyor; o hep en iyisi. Her maç sonu en çok koşan en çok top kazanan en çok mücadele eden oyuncu oluyor. Seni çok seviyoruz. N’Golo Kante. https://t.co/yXHjOFp1eI

    3.2K8226169K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    Halil Umut Meler denen hakem müsvettesi mahvetmiş maçı rezil herif. Yönetim seçilmeden önce hakemler mhk tff bunlar için en kolay işler diyordu bari bu sözünüzü tutun da şu takımın haklarını yedirmeyin.

    3.0K141651156K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 2026

    Tarihin doğru tarafında duranın vicdanı rahat olur.

    2.4K17614038166K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 2026

    Tarihin en iyi futbolunu maaşını her yerde magazin ettikleri, göndermeye çalıştıkları Kante oynuyor önceki yönetim aldı. Takımın tek ofansif umudu taraftarın aldırmak için götünü yırttığı Greenwood. İsmail Kartal’ın kalsın dediği herkesi gönderdiler yerine u23 bile alamadılar. Hataları var, hocadan gördüğüm en kötü derbi performansı oldu bu ama şu şartlarda eleştiriye ilk başta ondan başlamam yalnız bırakmam ben. Göz göre göre bile isteye rezalet kadro planlaması yaptılar.

    2.2K1571149149K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026

    Yağız Sabuncuoğlu: "Fenerbahçe yönetimi ve Başkan Aziz Yıldırım oyundan memnun değil. Mevcut yönetim bir senelik geldiği için bu sezon hızlı reaksiyonların senesi olacak. Fenerbahçe yönetimi, Roma ve Gaziantep maçlarını yakından izleyecek. Transfer döneminde iyi bir kadro kurulduğuna inanıyorlar, o yüzden Beşiktaş maçında oynanan oyunu kabul etmiyorlar. Eksik olan bölgelere yabancı kuralı sebebiyle transfer yapılmadığını, Fenerbahçe'nin mevcut 11'inin şampiyon olma konusunda gayet iyi bir kadro olduğunu düşünüyorlar." (KAFA Sports)

    1.4K23614216586K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#fileninsultanları

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.7K interactions against 259K followers, an engagement rate of 1.06%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 99K times each, and 2.77% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 38.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.0K interactions, about 2.2x its own typical post.

What is Glarung's engagement rate on X?
Glarung (@GlarungYedek) has an engagement rate of 1.06%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 259,371 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.06%, Glarung sits above the 75th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @GlarungYedek have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @GlarungYedek post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going