Back to @GlamourMagUK's profile

Glamour UK engagement report

@GlamourMagUK - 444K followers on X

Measured over 66 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 444K followers
Per impression
0%
1.3K views on a typical post
Reach
0.28%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
0
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.2/day
active 90% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 444K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 66 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.285% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 66 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 76 interactions.

Measured over 66 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Glamour UK's engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 0% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0%, Glamour UK sits below the 10th percentile of the 201,665 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,665 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,911 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 76 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Mar 12, 2026

    #WunmiMosaku exudes ancestral power. As she steps into the light with her Oscar-nominated role as Annie in Ryan Coogler’s history-making #Sinners, the actress opens up to Glamour’s Head of Editorial Content Kemi Alemoru about faith, ancestry, motherhood, and the role that changed everything. “This is the moment that I have worked 20 years towards.” Read the full cover interview here: https://t.co/AMSqHOz0iL

    5616138.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 2026

    An alternative to burgundy and black cherry. https://t.co/tUlP4XlW0w

    40001.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026

    From tinted moisturisers to light-coverage foundations. https://t.co/IIejwOYB8B

    40001.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20264.0x their median

    Buy a pair and never take them off. https://t.co/znDtPjMGvD

    40001.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20264.0x their median

    This season's most popular denim shape. https://t.co/h9pZnd4bml

    40002.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    The evenings are getting darker, but our hair doesn't have to. https://t.co/gV5j7tXHPp

    30001.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20263.0x their median

    “People think I’m serious, but I’m quite a silly, light-hearted person.” https://t.co/gU8K0poknp

    21001.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20263.0x their median

    As the 35-year-old Irish television star is revealed as the new face of GUESS Allegra. https://t.co/zgPfvQGc4M

    30001.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 2026

    So shiny 💫. https://t.co/iWzVpiSNQi

    20001.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026

    If it feels like your lip balm isn’t working, you should read this. https://t.co/VfY81YeUYD

    20001.1K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 444K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 66 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.285% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 66 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 76 interactions.

What is Glamour UK's engagement rate on X?
Glamour UK (@GlamourMagUK) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 66 original posts from the last 30 days against 443,701 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0%, Glamour UK sits below the 10th percentile of the 201,665 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @GlamourMagUK have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @GlamourMagUK post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going