Glamour UK engagement report
@GlamourMagUK - 444K followers on X
Measured over 66 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 444K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 66 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.285% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 66 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 76 interactions.
Measured over 66 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Glamour UK's engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 0% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0%, Glamour UK sits below the 10th percentile of the 201,665 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.142% |
| 75th percentile | 0.671% |
| 90th percentile | 2.53% |
| 99th percentile | 82.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 0% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 100% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -8% | -9% to -7% | 41K |
- 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 76 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Mar 12, 2026
#WunmiMosaku exudes ancestral power. As she steps into the light with her Oscar-nominated role as Annie in Ryan Coogler’s history-making #Sinners, the actress opens up to Glamour’s Head of Editorial Content Kemi Alemoru about faith, ancestry, motherhood, and the role that changed everything. “This is the moment that I have worked 20 years towards.” Read the full cover interview here: https://t.co/AMSqHOz0iL
- Sep 22, 2026
An alternative to burgundy and black cherry. https://t.co/tUlP4XlW0w
- Sep 1, 2026
From tinted moisturisers to light-coverage foundations. https://t.co/IIejwOYB8B
- Aug 17, 20264.0x their median
Buy a pair and never take them off. https://t.co/znDtPjMGvD
- Aug 15, 20264.0x their median
This season's most popular denim shape. https://t.co/h9pZnd4bml
- Sep 7, 2026
The evenings are getting darker, but our hair doesn't have to. https://t.co/gV5j7tXHPp
- Aug 21, 20263.0x their median
“People think I’m serious, but I’m quite a silly, light-hearted person.” https://t.co/gU8K0poknp
- Aug 19, 20263.0x their median
As the 35-year-old Irish television star is revealed as the new face of GUESS Allegra. https://t.co/zgPfvQGc4M
- Sep 21, 2026
So shiny 💫. https://t.co/iWzVpiSNQi
- Sep 14, 2026
If it feels like your lip balm isn’t working, you should read this. https://t.co/VfY81YeUYD
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 444K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 66 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.285% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 66 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 76 interactions.
- What is Glamour UK's engagement rate on X?
- Glamour UK (@GlamourMagUK) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 66 original posts from the last 30 days against 443,701 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0%, Glamour UK sits below the 10th percentile of the 201,665 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @GlamourMagUK have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @GlamourMagUK post?
- Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.2 posts per day across the measured window.