Back to @GilgameshIQ's profile

History of Mesopotamia engagement report

@GilgameshIQ - 118K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.107%
of 118K followers
Per impression
3.48%
3.6K views on a typical post
Reach
3.07%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
126
interactions (median)
Saved
0.248%
9 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 126 interactions against 118K followers, an engagement rate of 0.107%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.6K times each, and 3.48% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 310 interactions, about 2.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

History of Mesopotamia's engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 77% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.107%, History of Mesopotamia sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 733 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 30, 20262.5x their median

    حكمة سومرية من لا يحكم نفسه، سيبقى عبدًا ولو ملك الأرض Wisdom Sumerian He who does not rule himself will remain a slave, even if he rules the earth." https://t.co/lnqsCDoika

    26140546.0K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20262.0x their median

    حكمة سومرية البيت الذي لا تُسمع فيه مشورة الزوجة، ينهار جدارُه سريعًا." Wisdom Sumerian The house in which the Wife’s counsel is not heard, its wall will soon collapse." https://t.co/HTgIdPV15J

    19852613.9K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20261.6x their median

    جدارية اشورية من نينوى شمال العراق تظهر قدم الملك الاشوري تغلاث فلاصر الثالث على رقبة الملك العيلامي هومبان تاهراه الأول بعد هزيمة الجيش العيلامي في غربي ايران خلال القرن الثامن ق.م An Assyrian wall relief from Nineveh, northern Iraq, depicting the Assyrian king Tiglath-Pileser III placing his foot on the neck of the Elamite king Humban-Tahrah I after defeating the Elamite army in western Iran during the 8th century BCE.

    17322414.5K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 2026

    حكمة سومرية اخلاق الأنسان تدل على نوع الاله الذي يعبده Sumerian wisdom Man's morals indicate the type of god who worships him https://t.co/5zVpHUPaW3

    13937553.9K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 2026

    هل تعلم ان الاسم السومري للبومة هو (اكوكو) (𒀀𒆪𒆪), أما في الاكدية فهو (بوم) ” (𒉿𒈬). أطلق السومريون على البومة " اكوكو " مثال على ذلك ما جاء في لعنة أكاد، القصة السومرية القديمة التي كتبت حوالي 2100 ق.م "أحذر قد يجعل اكوكو الطائر الكئيب عشه في بواباتك، فهو، طائر المدن المدمرة الطائر ذو القلب الحزين الطائر النائم" Did you know? The Sumerian word for owl was “Akuku” (𒀀𒆪𒆪), while in Akkadian it was “Būmu” (𒉿𒈬). The Sumerians referred to the owl as “Akuku”, as attested in the Curse of Agade, an ancient Sumerian literary composition dating to around 2100 BCE: > “Beware, lest Akuku, the gloomy bird, make its nest in your gateways— the bird of ruined cities, the bird with a sorrowful heart, the sleeping bird.”

    12845313.8K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 2026

    حكمة اشورية أخفض صوتك فأنه لو كان المرء يستطيع ان يبني بيتًا بالصوت العالي لكان الحمار يستطيع بناءً دارين في يوماً واحد Assyrian wisdom Lower your voice, for if a person could build a house with a loud voice, a donkey could build two houses in one day https://t.co/YS9cWXxPRW

    13536324.1K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 2026

    استخدم العراقيون قارب القفة منذ عهد سومر قبل آلاف السنين. وهو قارب دائري الشكل يشبه السلة الكبيرة، يُغطّى قعره بالجلود ويُغلَّف بالكتان وقطع الصوف، ثم تُضغط هذه المواد بإحكام وتُطلى بطبقة من الطين الرقيق والقار لضمان منع التسرب وقد استمر استعمال القُفّة في العراق حتى القرن الماضي Iraqis have used the quffa boat since the time of the Sumerians, thousands of years ago. It is a circular boat resembling a large basket. Its bottom was covered with animal hides and wrapped with linen and pieces of wool. These materials were then tightly compressed and coated with a thin layer of clay and bitumen to ensure waterproofing. The quffa continued to be used in Iraq until the last century..

    13438113.6K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 2026

    الكتابة المسمارية ظهرت الكتابة المسمارية في مدينة أوروك السومرية حوالى 3400-3200 قبل الميلاد، كحل عملي لتسجيل الحبوب والماشية برموز تصويرية. استُخدم قلم من القصب على ألواح طينية رطبة، تاركاً علامات إسفينية. لاحقاً بدأ الرمز يدل على الصوت لا الشيء، فأمكن تدوين الأسماء والأفكار. تبنّتها لغات كالأكادية والحثية، واستمر استخدامها أكثر من ثلاثة آلاف عام حتى القرن الأول الميلادي. Cuneiform Writing Cuneiform writing emerged in the Sumerian city of Uruk around 3400–3200 BCE as a practical solution for recording grain, livestock, and other goods using pictographic symbols. A reed stylus was pressed into wet clay tablets, leaving wedge-shaped impressions. Later, signs began to represent sounds rather than objects, making it possible to record names, words, and ideas. Cuneiform was subsequently adopted for languages such as Akkadian and Hittite, and remained in use for more than three thousand years, until the 1st century CE.

    11148114.3K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 2026

    حكمة اشورية الجمال سوف يبلى ويزول لكن الصيت الحسن يبقى الى الابد Assyrian wisdom Beauty will disappear and end up but the reputation good remain forever https://t.co/heDRb7OGFa

    11840013.7K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 2026

    قلادة و اقراط الملكة السومرية شبعاد ( بو ابي ) عثر عليها في اور جنوب العراق 2600 ق.م Earrings and necklace of Sumerian Queen Shubad ( Buabi ) of Ur South Iraq.2600 BC https://t.co/PA83PXB4vm

    11440023.7K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 126 interactions against 118K followers, an engagement rate of 0.107%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.6K times each, and 3.48% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 310 interactions, about 2.5x its own typical post.

What is History of Mesopotamia's engagement rate on X?
History of Mesopotamia (@GilgameshIQ) has an engagement rate of 0.107%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 118,262 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.107%, History of Mesopotamia sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @GilgameshIQ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @GilgameshIQ post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going