Back to @GiaPaige's profile

rem ʕ⁎̯͡⁎ ʔ༄ engagement report

@GiaPaige - 343K followers on X

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.03%
of 343K followers
Per impression
0.609%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
4.89%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
102
interactions (median)
Saved
0.012%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.9/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 102 interactions against 343K followers, an engagement rate of 0.03%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 43% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.609% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.89% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 6% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.2K interactions, about 42x its own typical post.

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

rem ʕ⁎̯͡⁎ ʔ༄'s engagement rate beats 43% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 35% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.03%, rem ʕ⁎̯͡⁎ ʔ༄ sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,691 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99118.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,691 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,485 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile118.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link6% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 120 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 18, 202642x their median

    In LA u gotta be careful who’s backyard / which landscape u post cause you will give yourself away that you’re at some one’s Beverly hill mansion selling pussy ! Like I knoooooow that home! I know what happens there!

    4.1K1211722122K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20264.6x their median

    My butt is so big bc that’s where all the love I have for you is stored 🤍

    4291524015K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20254.2x their median

    My only accounts on Twitter are @/ GiaPaige @/ remyyyX3 and @/ NoviiiTV. My IG is @/ RealGiaPaige and my TikTok is @/ cupofstarsss If you are talking to anyone anywhere else, you are being scammed. I don’t use email to talk to people. I don’t ask for money. Be safe.

    39022182727K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20263.6x their median

    HEY FELLOW HORNY DUDES ON THE INTERNET do me a solid and stop sexualizing every damn thing adult creators post when it's CLEARLY not sexual. It's harrassment and YOU'RE NOT AS FUNNY AS YOU THINK YOU ARE. Her: my head hurts You: try my dick 4 quick pain relief bb lolz Like CHILL

    2945321337K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20262.6x their median

    I love following people back but some of you are mean to other people and I don’t like that so I’m clearing out my following. If I remove you, yes it was personal. Don’t reach out again x

    244618017K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20262.0x their median

    My private account is for my own personal shenanigans, not as a “get to know me” please let me have some separation between work and home. Thank you. 🤍

    19944012K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20261.9x their median

    I love existing in the same timeline as you🤍

    178411019K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20261.6x their median

    Good morning 💕

    135226014K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20261.5x their median

    Tit heavy

    15017013K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20261.5x their median

    I want Dunkin donut hot chocolate and sprinkle donut and a kiss and a hug and a back rub and an ice cream from the ice cream truck later and then we watch evil dead and go sleep

    128425014K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 102 interactions against 343K followers, an engagement rate of 0.03%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 43% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.609% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.89% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 6% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.2K interactions, about 42x its own typical post.

What is rem ʕ⁎̯͡⁎ ʔ༄'s engagement rate on X?
rem ʕ⁎̯͡⁎ ʔ༄ (@GiaPaige) has an engagement rate of 0.03%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 342,748 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.03%, rem ʕ⁎̯͡⁎ ʔ༄ sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,691 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @GiaPaige have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 43% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @GiaPaige post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going