Back to @GiaPaige's profile

rem ʕ⁎̯͡⁎ ʔ༄ engagement report

@GiaPaige - 343K followers on X

Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.028%
of 343K followers
Per impression
0.606%
16K views on a typical post
Reach
4.67%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
97
interactions (median)
Saved
0.013%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.97/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 97 interactions against 343K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.606% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.68% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 7% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 186K interactions, about 1922x its own typical post.

Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

rem ʕ⁎̯͡⁎ ʔ༄'s engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 35% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.028%, rem ʕ⁎̯͡⁎ ʔ༄ sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video5% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link5% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 5% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 98 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 3, 20261922x their median

    i’ve never read something like this before and i (unfortunately) so get her https://t.co/REXhULPaIr

    179K7.7K78932.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 2026135x their median

    SHAKING IN MY BOOTS https://t.co/1hdnNB6pEr

    12K68726138339K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202644x their median

    In LA u gotta be careful who’s backyard / which landscape u post cause you will give yourself away that you’re at some one’s Beverly hill mansion selling pussy ! Like I knoooooow that home! I know what happens there!

    4.1K1211722122K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20264.8x their median

    My butt is so big bc that’s where all the love I have for you is stored 🤍

    4271524017K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20254.2x their median

    My only accounts on Twitter are @/ GiaPaige @/ remyyyX3 and @/ NoviiiTV. My IG is @/ RealGiaPaige and my TikTok is @/ cupofstarsss If you are talking to anyone anywhere else, you are being scammed. I don’t use email to talk to people. I don’t ask for money. Be safe.

    39022182727K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20264.2x their median

    I don’t talk much about my personal life because it’s a dumpster fire and I don’t want to give the trolls ammunition but if yall could just like…. Keep me in your thoughts …. lol

    373732017K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20263.8x their median

    HEY FELLOW HORNY DUDES ON THE INTERNET do me a solid and stop sexualizing every damn thing adult creators post when it's CLEARLY not sexual. It's harrassment and YOU'RE NOT AS FUNNY AS YOU THINK YOU ARE. Her: my head hurts You: try my dick 4 quick pain relief bb lolz Like CHILL

    2945321337K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20263.8x their median

    Who wants new jerk off material of me

    338521015K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20263.5x their median

    Whenever I post a pic of my ass I think it’s hilarious that you all tag Mike lmao like that’s my legacy huh

    305927123K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20263.2x their median

    Brandi’s bills are past due it appears

    290138222K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 97 interactions against 343K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.606% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.68% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 7% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 186K interactions, about 1922x its own typical post.

What is rem ʕ⁎̯͡⁎ ʔ༄'s engagement rate on X?
rem ʕ⁎̯͡⁎ ʔ༄ (@GiaPaige) has an engagement rate of 0.028%, based on the median interactions across 41 original posts from the last 30 days against 342,534 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.028%, rem ʕ⁎̯͡⁎ ʔ༄ sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @GiaPaige have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @GiaPaige post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going