Gia Macool engagement report
@GiaMMacool - 264K followers on X
Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 536 interactions against 264K followers, an engagement rate of 0.204%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 3.52% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 21% carry an image or video and 28% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 20x its own typical post.
Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Gia Macool's engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 79% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.204%, Gia Macool sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 21% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 21% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 486 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 31, 202620x their median
Be careful what you wish for ladies. If Lindsay Clancy is found innocent because “hormones made her unstable,” that precedent will not stay in one courtroom. It will follow every woman alive going forward. From this day forward applications start asking: Are you hormonal? College. Marriage. Teachers. Abortions. Judges. Presidents. Healthcare. Childcare. Gun ownership. High-stress careers. Law enforcement. Driver’s licenses. Tenant applications. Air traffic controllers. Will be denied…. because we’ll, you’re a woman so naturally you’re hormonal. You might as well, appeal the 19th while you’re at it. Cheer for Lindsey and you help close the doors women spent decades opening. This is why women fight the hardest for the exact same thing that ends up harming them long term.
- Sep 20, 202610x their median
Women: I don't understand why I can't find a man Also women: https://t.co/I8PyAf4CIy
- Sep 17, 20269.0x their median
There’s a huge difference between a woman who has sex with you and a woman who wants to have sex with you. Most men would rather have their wife initiate once because she wants him than be given sex ten times because he asked.
- Feb 19, 20268.6x their median
Things men need from their wives but shouldn’t have to ask for them: • Initiating intimacy • Building him up in public and in private • Random physical displays of affection • Saying “thank you and I trust you” • Choosing him over attention from others Wives who master these without him having to ask for it, have husbands who can’t wait to go home.
- Sep 6, 20267.3x their median
Physical intimacy is how men feel loved. For women, they feel loved through emotional intimacy. If a man withheld emotional intimacy to his wife which includes: Providing for her Checking in on her Making her feel safe and seen She would ask for a divorce and no one would say she did anything wrong. Yet, when a man is withheld sex he is told that he still has to keep his vow to marriage, even when he doesn’t feel loved. That’s why withholding sex is cheating on your marriage.
- Sep 4, 20267.1x their median
Something changed mentally in millions after the Covid vaccines. And I think it causes psychosis and mental health issues. Look it up, it created a pathway to alter the brain. I’ve been saying it for years and getting called crazy for it but just look who controls the SSRIs… same people as the Covid vaccines. That vaccines has ruined a lot of people and most of them don’t even know it.
- Sep 18, 20265.4x their median
When women are single, they’re “choosing themselves.” When men are single, it’s a “loneliness” and somehow men are still blamed. Marriage rates fall? Men are blamed because women supposedly “do everything.” At what point are we allowed to ask whether modern women might also contribute to these problems? The media talks endlessly about what men need to fix, while criticism of women is often softened, redirected, or avoided. These are the issues. Everyone is afraid to hold women accountable especially the media. Why?
- Sep 2, 20263.9x their median
How to keep it sexy in a marriage: 1. F*%k in random places Stop being a starfish 2. Surprise head If he needs to ask for it You’re failing as a wife 3. Stay under 22% bf Fatties aren’t attractive 4. If the kiddos are gone Cook in a thong;) Yes, cook in a bikini as often as possible 5. Flash those boobies often And end it with a happy ending That means have fun Learn to laugh at yourself And stop taking life so damn seriously.
- Sep 2, 20263.7x their median
Scrolling on social media made it obvious: The obsession with traveling for women isn’t to learn culture. They aren’t working out to build a strong mentality. They aren’t working on a house to make it a home for their husbands. They’re traveling to be seen traveling. Remodeling to keep up with trends. Hitting the gym to sell sex. Take the phone away and their ability to show off…these same women would rather stay home, get fat and live in an apartment.
- Sep 7, 20263.6x their median
I was raised in an Arab household. Men didn’t go into the kitchen. From as early as I can remember, around age three, I was right there beside my mother, helping her prepare food. In our home, hospitality was never optional. If you came to my house as a guest, you were going to be fed, served, and taken care of. You were gonna be sent home food for tomorrow. That’s simply how I was raised. And it’s no different in my marriage. I believe in serving my husband, just as my husband protects and takes care of his wife. To me, it’s not about one person being above the other. It’s about each person honoring their role, showing love through their actions, and taking care of one another.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 536 interactions against 264K followers, an engagement rate of 0.204%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 3.52% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 21% carry an image or video and 28% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 20x its own typical post.
- What is Gia Macool's engagement rate on X?
- Gia Macool (@GiaMMacool) has an engagement rate of 0.204%, based on the median interactions across 47 original posts from the last 30 days against 263,593 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.204%, Gia Macool sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @GiaMMacool have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @GiaMMacool post?
- Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.07 posts per day across the measured window.