Back to @Gerashchenko_en's profile

Anton Gerashchenko engagement report

@Gerashchenko_en - 695K followers on X

Measured over 71 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.184%
of 695K followers
Per impression
3.98%
32K views on a typical post
Reach
4.62%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.059%
19 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.73/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 695K followers, an engagement rate of 0.184%. Measured over 71 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 3.98% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.61% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 71 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 8.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 71 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Anton Gerashchenko's engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 85% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.184%, Anton Gerashchenko sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 670 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 9, 20268.5x their median

    Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski: "I believe Putin is making the exact same mistake as Nazi Germany did when bombing London. As a reminder, up to a thousand people died there every day. When you strike a city and kill 2–12 people a day, it in no way affects the Ukrainian army's ability to defend the Donbas. However, the Russians might think that this will intimidate the population and cause the public to pressure the political authorities. Well, yes - that is what the Germans were hoping for when they bombed Coventry or London. The Allies were also hoping for something similar when they bombed Hamburg, Berlin, or Dresden. And in both cases, it proved to be counterproductive. When people are attacked, they rally around the leadership. Meanwhile, the Ukrainians are attacking oil refineries." - @sikorskiradek

    8.9K1.8K13037273K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20267.8x their median

    President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Prime Minister of Canada Mark Carney signed the 100 Year Partnership Declaration between Ukraine and Canada. Canada was the first Western country to recognise the restoration of Ukraine’s independence on December 2, 1991. https://t.co/wUckAurvXf

    8.0K1.7K14456112K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20267.0x their median

    Ukrainian athlete Yaroslava Mahuchikh is now world's absolute champion in high jump. She conquered the 1,99 m height at a competition in Budapest. Congratulations! https://t.co/uGcz0ELx5M

    8.0K808932989K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20265.7x their median

    President Zelenskyy: "From intelligence reports and individuals within Putin's inner circle, we know that in early September Putin declared: 'From now on, there are no rules.' The Russians failed to occupy us, so now they are resorting to massive strikes and mass killings. Naturally, they want to destroy our bridges and, as we understand, our data centers, internet infrastructure, mobile networks, hospitals, kindergartens, schools, universities — everything. They want people to flee their cities, and we must do everything in our power to save our people and our cities."

    5.3K1.7K1846892K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20265.4x their median

    Russian Telegram channels report several powerful explosions in Moscow region, in one of the workshops of the Krasnozavodsk Chemical Plant. The plant manufactures industrial explosives, gunpowder, pyrotechnics, and ammunition components, including thermobaric warheads for Shahed-type drones. There is no information what caused the explosion at the moment.

    5.8K967733470K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20264.9x their median

    Attacks on Russia last night: ▪️ An 85,000-square-meter OZON logistics complex in Saratov was hit by drones. ▪️ It was reported that Rosneft’s Saratov oil refinery caught fire. ▪️ Local residents reported a major fire at the Lukoil-Volgogradneftepererabotka refinery in Russia’s Volgograd region. ▪️ The Azot chemical plant in Berezniki, Perm region, was reportedly struck. ▪️ An attack and a series of loud explosions were also reported in Kaspiysk, where a seaport is located. ▪️ In occupied Shakhtarsk, Donetsk region, a warehouse storing drones or ammunition may have been targeted. 11 Russian airports - from Saratov and Kazan to Nizhny Novgorod and Gelendzhik - temporarily suspended arrivals and departures.

    5.1K972743655K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20264.8x their median

    Leaders of Finland, Denmark, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Norway have arrived in Kyiv ahead of our Independence day. https://t.co/NTeOkuzsxZ

    5.3K69113321119K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20264.7x their median

    Ukrainian Defenders share the precious first moments of meeting their newborn babies. 📹: justillusion.11 / Threads https://t.co/oRcNGimHKl

    5.0K869953145K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20264.6x their median

    Three Russian aircraft in a single operation: a Su-33, a MiG-29 and the Orion strike and reconnaissance drone were taken down by the Unmanned Systems Forces. They also destroyed a "whole zoo of enemy air defense assets": 8 radar systems, an S-400 division position in Gelendzhik, and 2 air defense systems - Tor and Pantsir. 11 out of 14 targets were successfully hit in Russia’s Rostov and Krasnodar regions, while the remaining three were struck in occupied Crimea.

    5.0K868442363K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20264.3x their median

    Unmanned Systems Forces of Ukraine operators destroyed a Su-33 fighter, a Mi-8 helicopter, and two radar systems! 🔹 13 vessels of the Russian "shadow fleet" were struck in the Black Sea. 🔹 A number of warships, including missile carriers, were hit at the Novorossiysk naval base. 🔹 A Su-33 carrier-based fighter and a Mi-8 helicopter were destroyed in Anapa. 🔹 Two radar systems were struck near Gelendzhik: a "Kasta 2E2" radar and a 92N6 radar from the S-300/400 surface-to-air missile system. Glory! Image: for illustration purposes, looking forward to actual footage emerging

    4.7K640651470K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 695K followers, an engagement rate of 0.184%. Measured over 71 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 3.98% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.61% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 71 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 8.5x its own typical post.

What is Anton Gerashchenko's engagement rate on X?
Anton Gerashchenko (@Gerashchenko_en) has an engagement rate of 0.184%, based on the median interactions across 71 original posts from the last 30 days against 694,549 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.184%, Anton Gerashchenko sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Gerashchenko_en have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Gerashchenko_en post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going