Geraldo Rivera engagement report
@GeraldoRivera - 392K followers on X
Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 281 interactions against 392K followers, an engagement rate of 0.071%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 65% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 2.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.47% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 35% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.6K interactions, about 20x its own typical post.
Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Geraldo Rivera's engagement rate beats 65% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 68% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.071%, Geraldo Rivera sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 35% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 35% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 543 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 26, 202620x their median
If the Democrats gain control of either House in the midterms, their first order of business will be to impeach President Trump. It will again be a huge waste of time. They can never get the 67 votes needed to convict, but they’ll do it because they can.
- Aug 14, 202615x their median
Let POTUS complete his golden ballroom. He knows how to build. If it’s too shiny, let the next guy fix it. Everything should not be a fight to the finish.
- Aug 24, 202614x their median
165 Canadians were killed fighting alongside us in Afghanistan, 2000 wounded. I’m not mad at Canada.🇨🇦
- Aug 11, 202613x their median
Keep the W in WNBA. This is the crazy story of two men, (there will be more), former NBA professional basketball players, announcing that they plan to enter the 2027 WNBA draft, the woman's professional league. They are Enes Kanter Freedom and Royce White. White seems a troubled man with a 50-year-long restraining order against him from his ex-wife and children. He is an erratic politician who happens to be a Republican candidate in Minnesota’s August 11th Senate primary. He announced that he has recently decided he is transgender and identifies as a woman for purposes of professional basketball. “I do the little things…whatever the coach needs me to do, whatever the girls need me to do,” White told Fox News and other outlets. The other former NBA player, Kanter Freedom posted his scheme of playing in the WNBA to X saying he's “not here to mock anyone,” but wants rules on gender applied equally. “If simply declaring who you are is all that's required then I meet every single requirement necessary to compete in the WNBA.” As the nation struggles with the debate on who exactly can play girls sports, we had to expect some wise guy would try to game the system. That's what this stunt feels like. Neither man as far as I know previously announced that they were trans, but they went for the publicity jugular perhaps to ridicule the sincere struggles some athletes are having about gender identity. The issue has been reignited by Indiana Fever guard Sophie Cunningham voicing opposition to transgender women participating in WNBA basketball. Her position seems totally reasonable. If possible, (and it is often impossible), a compromise in sports regarding toilets and locker rooms may be accommodated. Out of the locker room and onto the court, full stop. It is scientifically unfair for biological men and boys to compete against biological girls. Sophie Cunningham is right. Once out of say junior high school, biological men are bigger, faster, stronger. Those are facts of life. That is not bias, that is science. These former NBA players trying to elbow into the WNBA really should be exposed for the opportunists and attention seekers they are. The WNBA's collective bargaining agreement states unequivocally that “only players who are women are eligible to play in the WNBA.” Enough said.
- Sep 18, 202612x their median
Dear President Trump, As someone who has often supported you, including during the Russia, Russia, hoax, I ask that you forgo your announced intention to demolish the Kennedy Center if it is not named in your honor. There is no honor in that, only spite.
- Sep 10, 202611x their median
AI could kill us all by the end of the decade, say some conscientious experts. GOP response? No trans athletes in girls sports.
- Sep 22, 20267.8x their median
Facing widespread and growing opposition to the war in Iran and the malignant cost of diesel and groceries, President Trump attacks the news media. It is classic gaslighting.
- Sep 7, 20266.0x their median
The ultra right wing Alternative for Germany party is going to make Europe less stable. President Trump should tell us how he feels about this earthquake that elected “the most dangerous man in Europe.” https://t.co/vn9hJ4jGWE
- Sep 13, 20265.0x their median
Despite suffering massive casualties, Russia’s Spring/Summer offensive has “failed to make any operationally significant gains” in Ukraine. Putin‘s army is drowning in its own blood. Slava Ukraini
- Sep 25, 20264.4x their median
President Trump‘s ban on WH media was as badly timed as it was Unconstitutional. He wanted maximum exposure of his grand summit with the Chinese leader. He ended up playing in the dark to an audience of nobody.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 281 interactions against 392K followers, an engagement rate of 0.071%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 65% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 2.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.47% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 35% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.6K interactions, about 20x its own typical post.
- What is Geraldo Rivera's engagement rate on X?
- Geraldo Rivera (@GeraldoRivera) has an engagement rate of 0.071%, based on the median interactions across 37 original posts from the last 30 days against 392,279 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.071%, Geraldo Rivera sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @GeraldoRivera have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 65% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @GeraldoRivera post?
- Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.4 posts per day across the measured window.